Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
All I said was we'd lose when he swapped Davies for Jairo. When we set up he was more advanced, and only dropped back when Ollie came on. To bring on Arblaster for Peck, our midfield was then powderpuff. They were no where near positionally for the winner.Now I'm not having that. Some things to note:
- We were not winning the game when Ogbene came on, and were losing when Chong came on
- Davies was playing so deep that we were effectively playing three at the back, hence those two were de facto wing backs, increasing attacking options when (checks notes) we were not winning
- The only options we didn't use were Faxon, Hjelde, McGuinness and Cannon. Only one of those offers any attacking option at all, and he's a pure 9. We had one of those on already, and brought another one on. You can't play three at the same time and taking Bamford off for Cannon would be crazy. Yes you could try Cannon instead of Ings but that's still the same argument really
There's a lot that you can criticise Wilder for, and I'm usually the first to do so, but given the options he had there's really not much else he could have done
The point you are trying to make may well be perfectly correct, but you have zero context of game flow from a still image as to why said player in QPR shirt that has faded in the wash is in that much space. This sort of thing does rustle me (particularly when it comes to tackles), would it really be that hard to link to where you've taken that screenshot from and say go to x:xx in the video?(low res screenshot from youtube)
I was in the upper corner, the player on the ball was in acres of space. The screenshot just shows you how bad it was with those two in the middle of the park.The point you are trying to make may well be perfectly correct, but you have zero context of game flow from a still image as to why said player in QPR shirt that has faded in the wash is in that much space. This sort of thing does rustle me (particularly when it comes to tackles), would it really be that hard to link to where you've taken that screenshot from and say go to x:xx in the video?
Changing manager is literally pointless. Because we'd be where we were last summer. We haven't invested (knowingly) in the infrastructure of the club, and so until we do so, I would trust Wilder the most to hold the ship as steady as possible. But we aren't likely to be competitive.
Why?
Our issue is, we're far from the finished article. That's why we create but are wasteful. Then, we lack the depth like-for-like, to keep the same tempo. Chong, Blaster, Ings, Davies. None bring the same fitness as who they replaced. The try, they are honest pros, but they have all had significant injuries in their careers. I won't take any of that "useless wanker" or "their on the beach already" crap. That's just laziness that shows the individual poster up. They are clearly trying.
The issue now, is that we're unlikely to have the resources needed to address the issues at hand. And what positives we do have (Cooper, O'Hare, Hamer, Seriki, Brooks, Peck) are likely to go.
Like I say, this isn't so much the opposition fighting their way back in to games, but us fading out of them. There's a difference. Combine that with easily knocked confidence and it explains why we are where we are.
To be on NetflixWhy was he wearing a suit?
Didn’t someone say that the owners were there yesterday? I assume that’s why he’d got a suit on, although he could’ve been at court on fraud chargesWhy was he wearing a suit?
The structure of the club mean we are doomed to fail unfortunately
Said same. Meeting owners representatives or looking smart for the Wrexham Hollywood after party.Why was he wearing a suit?
That's a lot of words to talk some utter bollocksWhat you on about?
If we’d won then would the structure be great?
Makes me laugh how reactive some of our fans are from game to game just based on the result.
It was only a few week ago Peck was brilliant and worth £20 million but now apparently he’s crap.
Around Xmas time Brookes was rubbish, get rid…but now apparently he’s PL bound and will play for England.
My view is that in the past Wilder was big on “characters/ leaders”.
We have talented players but there’s something missing.
Might sound daft but we’re lacking a Jack Robinson, run through brick walls, can’t stand losing type.
Not saying I’d want him back but it’s dressing room characters that are missing.
Now that we will be back to being skint next season…..Wilder becomes the perfect manager that’s required for the task.
This hot / cold relationship with the club makes me laugh and saddens me at the same time . My knee is fucked . It hurts some days not others. It’s a metaphor for the club . Unless I do something about it for the long term I will have to suffer the pain and soldier on . The Wilder era is spent as was the McCabe . I will go for the major overhaul, suffer the initial pain and hold my piss till it comes good . If only we had enough fans who had the balls to get behind it .What you on about?
If we’d won then would the structure be great?
Makes me laugh how reactive some of our fans are from game to game just based on the result.
It was only a few week ago Peck was brilliant and worth £20 million but now apparently he’s crap.
Around Xmas time Brookes was rubbish, get rid…but now apparently he’s PL bound and will play for England.
My view is that in the past Wilder was big on “characters/ leaders”.
We have talented players but there’s something missing.
Might sound daft but we’re lacking a Jack Robinson, run through brick walls, can’t stand losing type.
Not saying I’d want him back but it’s dressing room characters that are missing.
Now that we will be back to being skint next season…..Wilder becomes the perfect manager that’s required for the task.
Teams do need leaders. But in the modern game they also need athletes who can physically compete. We don’t tend to sign those, and we aren’t good at conditioning the players we do sign.Might sound daft but we’re lacking a Jack Robinson, run through brick walls, can’t stand losing type.
Not saying I’d want him back but it’s dressing room characters that are missing.
Now that we will be back to being skint next season…..Wilder becomes the perfect manager that’s required for the task.
Whereas I'm too scarred by the Selles horror show that I'd rather stick with what we know and relative mediocrity on scant resources, until we develop the structure of the club.I agree with you about the infrastructure of the club and changing manager might not really improve things or could even make things worse. But I’d still do it.
I’m just ready for something different, Wilder has been here for about 7 or 8 years out of the last 10. His best years were pre 2020 and I don’t see any signs of it returning.
If we keep Wilder, I will have zero optimism and enthusiasm for next season and it will feel like a chore going to the Lane. A leap into the unknown seems far more appealing right now!
I keep saying it. How about not making substitutions? It’s not mandatory. I could see Hoever getting tired but surely he can last a game to avoid the disaster of Ogbene attempting to play RB/WB?Now I'm not having that. Some things to note:
- We were not winning the game when Ogbene came on, and were losing when Chong came on
- Davies was playing so deep that we were effectively playing three at the back, hence those two were de facto wing backs, increasing attacking options when (checks notes) we were not winning
- The only options we didn't use were Faxon, Hjelde, McGuinness and Cannon. Only one of those offers any attacking option at all, and he's a pure 9. We had one of those on already, and brought another one on. You can't play three at the same time and taking Bamford off for Cannon would be crazy. Yes you could try Cannon instead of Ings but that's still the same argument really
There's a lot that you can criticise Wilder for, and I'm usually the first to do so, but given the options he had there's really not much else he could have done
We should have. Could have been 4 up at half time. Bamford with 2 sitters and O’Hare as a minimum.Todays rip roarer from our manager, 'we should have been out of sight'!
Well there it is then! Play 2 up front & we might have a chance to be.
Now now, come on mate.We should have. Could have been 4 up at half time. Bamford with 2 sitters and O’Hare as a minimum.
Those are the facts when you take your bias out of it. Those chances created without 2 up top.
What’s more concerning is the complete lack of bollocks from the team when it comes to defending a lead. Hamer is a ghost, Howver and Burrows are like cones in a training exercise. Bindon and Tanganga are a car crash under any minor pressure.
The balance of the squad is as shite as it could be. Lots of dross, little quality and absolutely no bollocks between them.
I keep saying it. How about not making substitutions? It’s not mandatory.
Unfortunately this hits it on the head.We should have. Could have been 4 up at half time. Bamford with 2 sitters and O’Hare as a minimum.
Those are the facts when you take your bias out of it. Those chances created without 2 up top.
What’s more concerning is the complete lack of bollocks from the team when it comes to defending a lead. Hamer is a ghost, Howver and Burrows are like cones in a training exercise. Bindon and Tanganga are a car crash under any minor pressure.
The balance of the squad is as shite as it could be. Lots of dross, little quality and absolutely no bollocks between them.
When the alternative is worse? Yes I am. The alternative in Ogbene for Hoever was worse. As for midfield that might not have been worse had Soumare been in the squad. But he wasn’t because Wilder prefers players who are unfit, past it, recovering from injury to anyone remotely athletic.The literal biggest issue this season has been fitness and declining performances in the second half and you're suggesting not bringing on fresh legs? Really?
Said same. Meeting owners representatives or looking smart for the Wrexham Hollywood after party.
I think this mirrors a lot of peoples thoughts, mine included. We need to plan where we go after Wilder but I have no confidence that there is anyone in the club that I would trust with making that decision. It was wrong to sack him in the summer and correct to then bring him back to sort out the Selles appointment disaster. What the owners should have been doing is putting a management structure in behind the scenes to plan for what comes next. There is no evidence to suggest they have even started to do that. We are therefore stuck in the short term with Wilder as the risks of another Selles type appointment at the moment is to great. The only saving grace is that it is possible for Wilder to put together an average squad that is capable of challenging for play offs especially under the new format (see Hull, Millwall) so at best might get lucky or at worst become a Stoke / Preston. We need to ensure we survive short term with the emphasis on putting structures in place that will move the club forward.Whereas I'm too scarred by the Selles horror show that I'd rather stick with what we know and relative mediocrity on scant resources, until we develop the structure of the club.
The issue with that, is we don't seem to be developing the structure of the club![]()
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?