Our discipline.

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




In today's game it was risky, but I don't know what else he could have done. His leg/foot slowed after contact with the ball, hard but just about fair for me. If he had pulled out of it he could have been the one hurt.
It's easy to criticise from the armchair, but even experienced players are essentially young lads & they get swept up in the heat of the moment & the occasion; I like to think I played hard but fair & I wouldn't have been happy with a team mate of mine if he had pulled out of that one.

It's all about opinion, no need to slag anyone if they don't hold the same view.
 
Klaatu Barada Nikto said:
It certainly was a clumsy challenge; By Ingellsson on Phillips.

Ridiculous red. Games fucking gone.
Click to expand...
I agree. Ingelson was a week late to the challenge. Ball had gone ages before he got there so he could have pulled up and stayed out of the way of where Philips boot was heading. Maybe we just have red and white specs on..
 
Gimli said:
Yet the people involved in the game - namely Wilder and Phillips himself have accepted it’s a red.

Wilder effectively said it was a red in his post match, and Phillips left the pitch with his hands up apologising - they know it’s a red.

Anyone defending it really had the blades tinted specs on.
Click to expand...
Wilder said it was a mistimed tackle. It wasn't. He got the ball.
 
Rudders said:
If you were being charitable on KP it was a genuine attempt to get the ball and his lack of match fitness meant that his swinging leg followed through at just the wrong height for Ingelssons knee, maybe not 100% deliberate just very clumsy. If anything I think it was less rash, less forceful and in a place where he had to challenge unlike Rothwells
Click to expand...
Let's be right he knew what he was doing. Shocking challenge but we all make bad decisions
 
Bladesman said:
He hasn't gone with force or speed.

If you want a red card for that then fair enough but I am seeing similar or worse left on our lads that barely see a yellow.
Click to expand...
No, I agree.

I don’t think it was a red, personally. It’s very harsh on Phillips. It would be impossible to not have any follow-though in that motion.

But the rules today are so soft that I’m not shocked. Especially with the Wednesday players reaction, maybe forced the ref into a decision.
 
In 2026, you get a red card for tackles that endangers the safety of an opponent or use excessive force. This is judged by factors such as if the tackle is leading with studs (it was), if the tackle is off the ground (it was) and if the player uses excessive speed in making the challenge (debatable).

If you win the ball, then fly into someone's shin, it's a red.
 
Karaoke Blade said:
Wilder said it was a mistimed tackle. It wasn't. He got the ball.
Click to expand...
When they look back at the tackle and can see Phillips clearly got the ball and it was his follow through momentum that accidentally brushed his knee......could the red card be rescinded or down graded to a yellow on appeal ?

Asking politely for an imaginary friend 😉
 
blAdes96 said:
I’m undecided on whether it’s a red or not.

Yeah, in slow-motion the follow-through makes it look much worse.

But at speed in the ground it just looked an ordinary clearance / clash of body parts, with no malice intended.

Where else can his leg go in that motion with the Wednesday player chasing in on top of him to try and also win that ball…
Click to expand...
I think we know that you can soften your leg in those situations, he didn’t and followed through
 
Brian Deane said:
When they look back at the tackle and can see Phillips clearly got the ball and it was his follow through momentum that accidentally brushed his knee......could the red card be rescinded or down graded to a yellow on appeal ?

Asking politely for an imaginary friend 😉
Click to expand...
No chance
 
Speedracer said:
In today's game it was risky, but I don't know what else he could have done. His leg/foot slowed after contact with the ball, hard but just about fair for me. If he had pulled out of it he could have been the one hurt.
It's easy to criticise from the armchair, but even experienced players are essentially young lads & they get swept up in the heat of the moment & the occasion; I like to think I played hard but fair & I wouldn't have been happy with a team mate of mine if he had pulled out of that one.

It's all about opinion, no need to slag anyone if they don't hold the same view.
Click to expand...
Professional footballers pull out of 50:50 tackles all the time. Ones that a Saturday pub league player would fly into. Difference is a) they are risking a career ending injury by getting involved and b) they are likely to get red carded if they get it wrong
 
MayorOJC said:
In 2026, you get a red card for tackles that endangers the safety of an opponent or use excessive force. This is judged by factors such as if the tackle is leading with studs (it was), if the tackle is off the ground (it was) and if the player uses excessive speed in making the challenge (debatable).

If you win the ball, then fly into someone's shin, it's a red.
Click to expand...

*Unless the player on the end of the tackle is wearing a red and white shirt.
 



MayorOJC said:
In 2026, you get a red card for tackles that endangers the safety of an opponent or use excessive force. This is judged by factors such as if the tackle is leading with studs (it was), if the tackle is off the ground (it was) and if the player uses excessive speed in making the challenge (debatable).

If you win the ball, then fly into someone's shin, it's a red.
Click to expand...

The Wednesday player wasn’t in possession of the ball so it’s not a tackle. Phillips cleared the ball and the dozy twat came in late causing the injury to himself.
 
I think its a red in todays game.

If its a tackle on KP, we are all shouting for a red card.

I used to get kicked loads in football matches years ago and I would say its a possible red back then.

IMO, he wins the ball but there is no need for the follow through that high.

I always ask myself, would I be saying its a red card if it had have been on KP?

My answer is yes, so its a red for KP IMO
 
CornwallBlade said:
Professional footballers pull out of 50:50 tackles all the time. Ones that a Saturday pub league player would fly into. Difference is a) they are risking a career ending injury by getting involved and b) they are likely to get red carded if they get it wrong
Click to expand...

Exactly, the Wednesday should’ve pulled out, it wasn’t even a 50:50, it was 60:40 in Phillips favour, which is why he won the ball.
 
vas borbokis said:
I agree. Ingelson was a week late to the challenge. Ball had gone ages before he got there so he could have pulled up and stayed out of the way of where Philips boot was heading. Maybe we just have red and white specs on..
Click to expand...
His display of agony after the tackle was what they were hoping for.It was amazing that he got up showing no effects. Maybe he shouldn't have gone in for a late tackle
 
MayorOJC said:
In 2026, you get a red card for tackles that endangers the safety of an opponent or use excessive force.
Click to expand...
I think this is the key point, regardless of whether we agree or not. Not helped by Ingelsson squealing like a pig so to speak just to help make up the ref's mind.

Our players who have been sent off for straight reds must surely know how its interpreted but in the heat of the game don't seem have the awareness to maintain their discipline.

I for one believe that football is meant to be a contact sport and that getting kicked and sometimes getting injured is an occupational hazard rather than always being a punishable offence as it seems to be now.
 
Toronto Blade said:
His display of agony after the tackle was what they were hoping for.It was amazing that he got up showing no effects. Maybe he shouldn't have gone in for a late tackle
Click to expand...
He was looking at the ref before he hit the ground. Then rolled around in agony. Then played for another 40 minutes with no issues.

If Phillips had played it normally he would've been body slammed by Ingelson so instead he knocked it forwards in a way to protect himself.

1 yellow Vs 7 yellows
11 fouls Vs 20 fouls

We'll of course be seen as the bad guys because of another red card.
 
MayorOJC said:
In 2026, you get a red card for tackles that endangers the safety of an opponent or use excessive force. This is judged by factors such as if the tackle is leading with studs (it was), if the tackle is off the ground (it was) and if the player uses excessive speed in making the challenge (debatable).

If you win the ball, then fly into someone's shin, it's a red.
Click to expand...
Arguably Ingoldmells stumble into KP endangered him
 
CornwallBlade said:
Professional footballers pull out of 50:50 tackles all the time. Ones that a Saturday pub league player would fly into. Difference is a) they are risking a career ending injury by getting involved and b) they are likely to get red carded if they get it wrong
Click to expand...
Who said anything about players in a Saturday pub league?
 
Plenty in this thread seem to be of the opinion that rules around tackling haven't changed since the 90s.

Said this in SB earlier: It's no longer enough to just win the ball, you've got to do it cleanly. Whether contact with the player occurs after contact with the ball is irrelevant - Phillips goes in to smash the ball, and is fully prepared to take out anyone who gets in his way while doing so. That's not what is deemed "safe" in the modern game.

The threshold for what constitutes a red card is dramatically lower these days, and for good reason. Ingelsson was fortunate that he didn't come out of that challenge with a serious knee injury - it was a thoroughly deserved red.

But to get back to the topic this thread was originally made for, yes, the discipline is really poor. That even goes back to last season, where we were just engaging in group shoving contests every 4 or 5 games. It suggests poor direction from the coaching staff, that these things happen so frequently.
 



Gavlar said:
First things first, good result, and job done in tricky circumstances.

But for goodness sake, our red card record this season is a joke.

2 against Charlton to chuck a very winnable game.

1 against Ipswich (fortunately didn't matter).

1 against Boro that could have affected the result at 2-1 down.

1 against the fowls that could have caused a joke of a result.

I've probably forgotten others.

We have to stop the red cards. Especially very experienced pros getting them.

UTB
Click to expand...
But actually just one yellow compared to their seven
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ucandomagic
Updated “We Can Still Finish 6th”– Post Millwall – Chart & Graph
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
Dkc
Dkc
B
Ill discipline and leadership
2 3
Replies
73
Views
3K
Carlton Blade
Carlton Blade
BazWainwright
Proud of the lads
Replies
28
Views
2K
ancientblade
A
Coolblade
A few observations from the stats (Charlton)
Replies
2
Views
667
coolasanidiot
coolasanidiot
ucandomagic
Pre-Stoke – Graphs, Charts and Chat – Like Bread, We’re On the Rise
Replies
4
Views
697
ThirdGenBlade
T

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom