Has wilder lost the plot?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




As seen by his record at Southampton
2 wins out of 18.
Hull City
9 wins out of 28 and 5 wins out of 13 at his present club.

Lovely chap though.
Literally no point discussing anything with you. You're obviously delusional and think Wilder is the greatest manager to walk the earth and it's frankly embarrassing, but you do you.
 
As seen by his record at Southampton
2 wins out of 18.
Hull City
9 wins out of 28 and 5 wins out of 13 at his present club.

Lovely chap though.

Selles is doing a good job at Zaragozza Thomas i went to watch them at the weekend

They are comparing him to PEP in the spanish Media
 
If I was Brooks or Seriki I would be looking to move on this summer.

Or improve my game so that I wasn't singled out.

They have shown the standards they are capable of, why can they not replicate it for a mere 30 minutes.

Wilder is in a no win position though, if he had not brought on the subs 'to make a difference' his detractors would be crying ' no plan B '.
 
Specifically called those two out but didm’t name whoever he said wasn’t doing their job for the two Reed goals. He also named Burrows as his first choice full back which will have done a great job of motivating MaCallum, one of our best players this season. It’s very clear that he favours his “culture carriers”. If I was Brooks or Seriki I would be looking to move on this summer.
He called out several players including the CBs. Brooks floated around the pitch like an empty crisp packet and their left back had Seriki in his pocket. They've been playing well, especially Seriki but they were both poor yesterday. Why isn't the manager allowed to say it as it is?
 
He called out several players including the CBs. Brooks floated around the pitch like an empty crisp packet and their left back had Seriki in his pocket. They've been playing well, especially Seriki but they were both poor yesterday. Why isn't the manager allowed to say it as it is?
He is. But he is noticeably selective in those that he actually criticises by name. We didn’t lose that game because of two substitutes. If he’s going to be publicly slating individual players over what happened on Sunday I’d have been starting with Campbell and Chong.
 
He is. But he is noticeably selective in those that he actually criticises by name. We didn’t lose that game because of two substitutes. If he’s going to be publicly slating individual players over what happened on Sunday I’d have been starting with Campbell and Chong.
I may have seen a different interview to you as he definitely mentioned Mee, Mcguinnes, Chong and Ings in the clip I saw.
 
What is baffling is he's had a go at Seriki and Brooks and after they came on the score was 2-0 to us.

The charitable view is that CW thinks he can get more out of the pair by being hard on them but IMHO his stance on them is likely to be counter productive with their agents possibly looking to get them out of there.

In the meantime players like Ings, Chong and Campbell who were absolutely atrocious escape much of the criticism. It doesn't make sense
If he pisses off Seriki , the latter will piss off and we'll lose one of our few shining lights
 



Still wonder why he had to make the changes after the Oxford match was called off.
Would have thought it would be an ideal game to keep momentum going.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom