Blackburn 1 United 3 - report/ratings

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,376
Reaction score
36,480
It is back-to-back wins for Chris Wilder’s Blades after a come from behind victory at Ewood Park on Tuesday evening. After their victory over Watford on Saturday, United would have wanted to follow this up but the first half saw a largely passive performance where neither side showed much quality. Ohashi finished a move off just before the break and it was the home side that led but the Blades were able to respond after the break. Soumare forced an own goal for the leveller and then a triple change saw United able to find the quality to go on and win the game. Burrows expert finish after good work from Campbell and O’Hare put them into the lead and then at the death Brooks and Burrows combined to find Campbell for the clincher. It was hugely important for United to follow up the win at the weekend and they were able to show some resolve and fight, to turn the game around. The performance once again had concerns but to score three goals in one half is a big step up from what had gone before, albeit against a desperately poor opponent once again.



With three games in less than a week, Wilder opted to rotate his forward options with Cannon and Ings starting for Barry and Campbell. United were still without Tom Davies and Gus Hamer. Rovers made one change with De Neve in for only his second league start but their side much like United’s was much changed from their final games of the last campaign. Peck and Cooper were the only two United survivors from the playoff final against Sunderland. Whilst Blackburn only fielded three players that began the 1-1 draw at Bramall Lane- Toth, Tronstad and Ohashi. This probably shows why both sides have struggled to earn many points from their respective campaigns.



Rain had abated before the kick off and United started with Ings trying to barrel his way through but despite the lack of a challenge, he could only hook behind the far post. Ogbene’s cross drifted over. Blackburn had offered little in the early proceedings but Miller hurled a long throw in that McGuiness cleared and the home team won a corner soon after but Cooper caught Wharton’s header.



De Neve got down the left but his cross evaded Alebiosu before soon after Cooper took a ball dangerously close to the box. Peck made a good tackle to stop another attack as Rovers were now in the ascendancy. Henriksson then sliced over the bar after a cheap giveaway.



Blackburn then moved the ball around and were continuing to put dangerous crosses in. McCalughlin’s arrowed ball evaded everyone. Ogbene won a corner at the other end in United’s first attack for some time but soon after Soumare gave it away and Henriksson’s ball from the left was begging to be converted by Ohashi but he completely miskicked it.



A ball from the back nearly put Ohashi in as Mee was caught ball watching. The game was not seeing much goalmouth action as both teams were unable to keep the ball for any kind of prolonged time. Ogbene sent a ball over, as he continued to be the main United threat, but the ball was cleared before Soumare was penalised for a challenge.



Gudjohnsen had been a real threat for Rovers coming off the front line into pockets of space and was close to finding an opportunity before United finally were able to create something. Ings and Ogbene made it with neat interplay and fed O’Hare but his shot was saved at close range from Toth. From the corner, Tanganga went even closer to scoring as he did well to hook the ball towards the top corner but Toth reached up to turn the ball away.



Despite these two moments, Blackburn broke twice and should have made more of it. De Neve was completely clear but with two men over, he made a real mess of the ball and it was straight at Cooper. Rovers had another break soon after but United managed to hold it up temporarily but were not so fortunate on the next attack.



Gudjohnsen once again was the architect as he did well down the right and put over a delightful cross that found an unmarked De Nere. The winger scuffed his shot but it fell for OHASHI who also was left completely on his own and he finished past Cooper. It was a poor goal to concede with two crosses coming in from either side and no pressure on the ball or marking.



After this United could not muster a response at all and there continued to be big gaps between the midfield and attack meaning it was hard for Ings and Cannon to get involved. The latter’s contribution once again had been disappointing but Rovers crosses and balls in had been superior to United in a tight game.



Blackburn won an early corner and were more aggressive in the tackles early on. A ball across evaded Ohashi as Rovers began the second half on the offensive. However, out of nowhere the Blades were level. It came from a corner. McCallum’s sent the ball over and Tanganga headed the ball across. Soumare put HENRIKSSON under pressure and he could only divert it past his own keeper. The Senegalese midfielder wheeled away in delight and United were back in it.



Soumare then had another effort but sliced over before Ogbene had a go but his shot lacked power as United now looked to take the game over. Cannon made a decent run and was found by O’Hare but the striker’s shot lacked power. As the game transferred to the other end, Peck saw the ball out but Garnder Hickman knocked him into the advertising boards and then became involved in a tussle. The United players quickly came onto the scene and a melee ensued. After the players were separated both Gardner Hickman and Peck were booked; although Peck seemed unfortunate to see yellow!



On the hour mark, Campbell, Brooks and Burrows came on for Ings, Cannon and McCallum. Henriksson turned and hit a shot but it was well off target. Rovers made their own changes with Hedges and Morishita on for Gudjohnsen and Henriksson. However, it was the Blades that got the all important second goal in the 70th minute. Campbell did well to hold the ball up and was being dragged down but the ball dropped for O’Hare as the referee played advantage. O’Hare’s ball was weighted perfectly for BURROWS who came onto the ball and drilled it into the corner past the despairing dive of Toth.



Soumare came on for Riedewald and got a standing ovation from the away end for his efforts before Ohashi was replaced by Kargbo and Montgomery took the place of Gardner Hickman for Rovers.



The next 5 minutes saw the game became quite scrappy which probably suited United as the home side were struggling to fashion any kind of response. Gueye came on for McLaughlin as Blackburn tried to go even more direct. Tanganga gave away a cheap free kick and from the ball coming back from the right, Kargbo pulled an effort wide acrobatically.



There was 6 minutes of stoppage time that began with Morishita flashed an effort wide of Cooper’s near post. Shackleton replaced O’Hare as United tried to manage the game but they did even better than that in the 92nd minute – Campbell did well to hold it up initially before Brooks chipped a delightful ball down the line finding Burrows. The cross from the substitute was perfect for the waiting CAMPBELL who opened his body up to expertly glance the finish home.



Rovers race was done now and many of the fans were heading for the exits as the home side were heading for another home game without a victory – they have gone all season without a win at Ewood Park. The final whistle was punctuated with boos from the home fans that remained, whilst in contrast United’s players and management celebrated their second win in a week and finally were out of the relegation places.



United – Big win and a confidence building comeback where we saw some players who have not started the season well, find some form. There were lots of positives in the second half and credit to the team for finding a way back and then going on to win it. I must confess I was not happy at all at the break. We were behind but it really annoyed me that such a poor Rovers side were finding gaps and better composure/crosses and they may have had a few goals. We did not really do much attacking wise at all until the O’Hare shot and the Tanganga hooked effort. Outside of those two efforts, in quick succession, we barely laid a glove on them and did not seem to have a clue how to create. I thought Cannon was completely static but not sure that Ings was much better but both were not given much service either. I just felt we looked disjointed, did not seem to know how to move up the field and struggled to know how to create anything in open play. We just were relying on corners to maybe hope for a knock down/or header to drop. The other way we seemed to struggle to pick up men and they had a lot of openings down the sides. The goal came when we failed to stop a cross (two crosses) and that has been a feature even under Wilder (Hull/Southampton/Charlton goals) and it’s an easy unmarked finish.



The goal came out of nothing really as not sure we were pressing – they had started better in the second half but Tanganga won the header well and Soumare put his defender under pressure and we were level. The changes then saw us up it even more and Campbell and Burrows – two much maligned players for their performances so far this season – finally stepped up. Campbell was excellent at times in terms of holding it up and running behind. O’Hare also had an excellent second half and his play led to the second with a lovely ball and Burrows took it cooly. Blackburn did not really threaten and seemed to run out of steam and even before the third, we managed it pretty comfortably and not sure Cooper had a single save to make second half. The third was a superb goal with Brooks and Burrows playing two perfect balls and Campbell finishing in a fashion that we saw last season on many occasions. It felt good to win away, score three goals and fight back in a game where we looked fairly abject first half.



Blackburn, like Watford, were a poor side and think they will struggle this season and could go down – they have been completely mismanaged off the pitch. However, we still had to beat them and after being so off the pace first half, credit to the players for turning it round. I can assume they had a bit of a stern talking to at half time and did respond.



After such a miserable season and so many defeats, I am delighted to win two in a week. It was a great result and builds on Saturday. I am not getting carried away. I am not sure we were brilliant and it took way too long for us to get going and Blackburn were in the ascendancy long before they scored The formation did not work with Ings behind Cannon and O’Hare on the left. It seemed to give us little chance of scoring but I would say we were slow to the ball and when we had it were sloppy. Also defensively, we made mistakes and did not mark or stop crosses but the second half was much better and saw us do many things offensively that we have not seen all season – creating things, scoring goals and looking far more fluent. We seemed to get amongst them more and Peck/Soumare were pressing more and O’Hare was able to get into those areas where he could be dangerous (more central) playing off Campbell who gave us an outlet we had not had previously before. There is still a lot of work to be done but the return to form of a couple of key men was really encouraging. Preston, despite their defeat tonight will be more of a challenge as have more threats up top (Smith, Jebbison etc) and Hecky will want to get one over his old boss but we have to try and keep this mini run going. Talk of playoffs is crazy. We need to just slowly move up the league and keep chipping away but at least we have seen some signs of life this week.
 

Ratings:



Cooper 6/10 – Caught a few headers and then right on the edge of his area for another – which looked close to being handball? Kicked a few out which he seems to most games. The goal he has no chance with. After the break not sure he had anything to do – a few shots went wide. His handling was fine all night.



Ogbene 5.5/10 - Actually did at least look a threat in terms of putting in a few crosses and trying to get down that side first half but still made some poor decisions also. Defensively he did not always get in the right areas and we had gaps when they attacked. 2nd half did not see as much of him from an attacking point of view I felt but helped out more the other way.



McCallum 5/10 – Did not carry on the performance from Saturday and was relatively quiet I felt tonight. A few bits of link play but he did take the corner that led to the leveller. Burrows did really well when he came on and I do expect him to return at the start Friday but McCallum has done ok for a trio of starts.



McGuiness 6/10 – Won a few headers but also got away with a fell pulls too in the first half and almost seemed too tight – the other defenders were guilty of being too far off! He did improve as the game went on and seemed to win his battles more as they went more and more direct with long throws and balls into the box. He has been relatively steady in the last few games and maybe our best defender recent weeks?



Tanganga 5.5/10 – Ok and involved in two of our big attacking moments. Nearly scored with the hooked finish and then headed back for the equaliser. Not sure he has quite pushed on since his superb debut but I do not think the position suits him myself? He had a few loose touches and the lad De Neve had so much space between him and Ogbene. However, he stuck at his task and despite a few daft fouls, he is always aggressive and wanting to get in front of his man which I commend.



Mee 5.5/10 – Real struggle I thought for him tonight in the first half and worst he has been. He lost Ohashi constantly and seemed half asleep when the ball came through over his shoulder. They had a few chances long before they scored and on the goal was nowhere near his man – it was his man and he just lost him. He did improve after the break and became more composed and started to nip in and win things and looked more himself/composed.



Peck 6/10 – Ok performance. Nothing remarkable but he improved as the game went on. First half he seemed to be safe when he had it and felt they had too much time in the middle. Improved after the break and got amongst it and involved in a few skirmishes – which was more like the Peck we saw last season. Not sure he passed it forward much all game but did pick up some loose balls and helped us manage the game as it progressed.



Soumare 7/10 – Started with a few loose touches and seemed a bit ill disciplined (roaming around) but got better and better as the game went on. Started to get his foot in, made more progressive passes and just was more involved. The goal he forced and then had a few other attacking moments where he moved forward with the ball. Seemed to look like he belonged. Still raw but there was some glimpses of real promise tonight.



O’Hare 7/10 – His performance was again totally different first half to second. To begin with, he was on the left, the ball got away from him and he struggled to have much impact – other than the run and shot towards the end of the half. Second half he was more central and was able to get into the game more, helped press and ensure they did not get out and of course involved in the second. A lovely weighted pass that was perfect for Burrows to come onto. Overall, thought his energy and work rate really helped us massively turn it around.



Cannon 1.5/10 – The mark may seem harsh perhaps but he barely touched the ball, did not really move and just not even a nuisance. Granted the formation (with Ings seemingly behind him and O’Hare on the left) did not help and he was isolated but he has to actually move or try and anticipate. He had one decent run where he was found but his shot was weak but that was more like it. We looked much better when he came off. I think if he does play (not sure anyone wishes he would?) then you would want him in a two at least? I am not sure I would have him anywhere near the side – I would prefer likes of One or Marsh to him and his confidence seems rock bottom. I just hope Wilder does not keep playing and playing him – almost stubbornly – like he did with Brewster. No co-incidence we improved when he went off.



Ings 4/10 – He played in a sort of deeper role but it did not work. He had the one good run early on where he sort of bumbled through but after this, we saw little of him. Looked slow and tried to flick the ball rather than getting hold of it. We did not have any real threat in open play (except the O’Hare chance which he helped onto Ogbene). We improved hugely when him and Cannon left the field as we had O’Hare central and Brooks/Burrows as legitimate wide threats.



Subs -



Campbell 7/10 – Thought he looked much more like the player we saw last season in terms of his work rate and forcing defenders back. He held it up and physically did not give the defenders any time. The second goal comes from his play (he was fouled) and then of course he scores the third with a good run and finish. Even outside these moments, he just looked more himself and I thought that we played off him well too.



Brooks 6.5/10 – Like the other subs that came on around the hour mark, he contributed really well. He worked back defensively but also did show moments gong the other way. The ball for the third was sublime. Looked quite composed when he had it. Do wonder if he is better as an impact sub as seems to often struggle when he starts but him being fresh against tiring players seems to work better?



Burrows 7.5/10 – Cannot argue with a goal and an assist. He got into some great areas and they struggled to pick up. The second was very similar to some of those he scored last year, as he came onto it and picked his spot with his left foot. His cross for the third was excellent too. Looked more energetic, up for the fight and caused them problems constantly after he came on. I expect him to start on Friday night but has to keep these standards up.



Riedewald – Steady enough as we looked to see the game out and picked up a few loose bits and looked fairly composed.



Shackleton – Only on the last few minutes. Ball bounced off him twice back to them. Not a good sign for Matos, that he is being preferred as an option off the bench.



Manager: Wilder 6.5/10 – First half we were flat and his changes to the team in terms of how we played formation wise and those he brought in – did not work. We looked insipid attacking wise but also were loose in possession and they had chances/breaks where we failed to stop crosses. We did improve massively after the break with clearly words spoken and after the subs, upped it even more and went on to win comfortably in the end. We do have to try and put a more complete game together but we have been better in both the 2nd halves of tonight and last Saturday. He will hope we can start better on Friday evening. Credit to him for getting the team to get 2 big wins and hopefully the start of us moving up the table. I hope he does not keep tweaking things but maybe he was worried about 3 games in a week?





Blackburn – I thought they would struggle and think I picked them to go down and they are right where I had them to finish. They started ok but have quickly tailed off. Not sure Ishmail will remain much longer but even though he seems the classic rent-a-Championship manager – slowly they lost their better players. Szmodics left a season ago and then they have lost Travis, Wiemann, Batth, Britton, Dolan and Hyam – all who were experienced pieces that helped them challenge for the playoffs. In terms of replacing them it has been mostly unproved players at this level from overseas and it was always going to be a drop off. They still seem a bit of a mess off the pitch with the Venkys still part of the ownership group. They might stay up but it seems without investment or change, they are going to struggle to remain at this level especially when you have big spending sides coming up like Birmingham and Wrexham. It will be harder for them to stay away from trouble. Wednesday may take one spot but you worry about which other sides they could finish above – Charlton, Oxford and a few others you might be concerned about in terms of the drop – all started better.



They were ok first half and scored a goal that came from throwing bodies forward and had a few other chances like that where they did have men over but made poor choices when well placed. They were ok defensively and not put under any pressure until those two late challenges. Once they got in front, they would have hoped to go on and win their first home game but Ohashi just missed a cross and they then give away a sloppy goal. After this they never really got going again and United were the only team that looked like scoring really. The defence were getting turned and they were struggling as O’Hare, Burrows, Campbell were starting to impose themselves. The second and third both came down their right-hand side as Alebiosu and Miller struggled in the same way we had down the same area with players often spare. Burrows had the run of the park on both these goals. They seemed to run out of ideas – after a few decent moves first half – and long throws and balls pumped into the box became their only real tactic.



Opponent Man of the Match – Ohashi scored but also made a hash of a few too. The lad Gudjohnsen was their main threat as he got into good areas and put a few decent balls in. He was the main threat so glad when he went off.



Opponent Weak link – They were bigging De Neve up but he made some awful choices with the ball and even his assist for the goal was a miskick. I thought that Miller, despite his long throws (which was often just looped so had no power on them to meet) was poor and we really got down his side second half when we had the big moments. Slowly, Peck and Soumare won the midfield battle over Tronstad and Gardner Hickman.



Referee / Officials – David Webb. Reffed us in the Leeds/Burnley defeats at the end of the season but not sure he was at fault for these losses (stupid Anel penalty) and he was very good in the Leeds home game – I typed he was the best ref for ages and let things flow. He also did Watford away last season and going further back the Blackpool 3-3 draw (where both teams lost the plot!). Do recall the Stoke under Hecky when RND was brought down though and he did not give it! I like the fact he keeps his cards away and only books if he has to – the Peck one was harsh but hard to see it was just Gardner Hickman unless you had replays and after the initial push – you can understand him booking both as in a melee it would look like they both came together. No other bookings or other moments of controversy – Cooper seemed just inside his box when he caught it and then he played a very good advantage on the goal when Campbell was fouled. One of the better refs seemingly whenever we have him although very shiny (baby oil?).
 
Hard to disagree with much of this. I agree we're not getting the best of tanganga but he's sacrificing himself for the team. I thought they easily exposed our lack of pace in defence a few times first half. Mainly mee but mcguinness too hence the goal.

Ogbene is a funny one. Not sure what I make of him as a player. Steady maybe
 
I think we’re firmly back in the vein of performances under Wilder last season. Not that convincing at times, especially going forward, but have enough quality to win tight games. We’ve definitely improved and we have that Wilder magic about us again—he has something that doesn’t appear in any stats but just gives us that ability to win when we don’t quite deserve it.

1.5 is generous for Cannon, by the way.
 
Spot on with everything. Hopefully the more minutes Ings can build up and stay injury free he can be a good player coming on for us late in games.
 
Yeah as you mention Ings playing deep and O'Hare starting wide simultaneously was a terrible choice. Playing Cannon not smart either, especially in a 6 pointer.

I think if you're playing Ings deeper then there's no room for O'hare in the same team, he's never been a wide player anyway. The decision not to start Brooks ahead of one of them was quite baffling.
 
I think the marks for the CBs are harsh I would say all were a 7 all night long…

Tom Cannon needs to not have a numerical value rating but a word ‘tripe’ is under used nowadays

Carl Asaba did not have one good thing to say about him and that’s a fellow professional and a nice guy
 
You're assessment that the formation was wrong is spot on. Its been a feature all season. Every one could see McCallum was struggling down the left due to lack of support and that is where their goal eventually came from. Another game where we only really played for 45 minutes. It got us a much needed win and 3 points but the first half was poor. Fitness will be key to us moving away from the bottom.

Soumare made a difference in the middle. His puzzling lack of game time will need to be managed but he has all the makings of a Souza mark 2 if handled correctly. With him as LM and bringing on Brooks and Burrows we shut down Blackburns threat. Brooks may be being managed carefully due to him being injured but he has to start against PNE as he along with Soumare bring balance to the left. Agree about Campbell. Its significant he looked a different player once COH moved inside.

Three games in 6 days is difficult due to our poor conditioning but we have secured two wins. I think its Seriki who should be disappointed more than Matos that Shackelton is being preferred to him. His pace option off the bench provides a useful alternative to Ogbene. Another head scratching decision that you worry is more about shoe horning in an injury hit player to prove he was a good signing rather than using the benefit of pace. An area where we are lacking.
 
You're assessment that the formation was wrong is spot on. Its been a feature all season. Every one could see McCallum was struggling down the left due to lack of support and that is where their goal eventually came from. Another game where we only really played for 45 minutes. It got us a much needed win and 3 points but the first half was poor. Fitness will be key to us moving away from the bottom.

Soumare made a difference in the middle. His puzzling lack of game time will need to be managed but he has all the makings of a Souza mark 2 if handled correctly. With him as LM and bringing on Brooks and Burrows we shut down Blackburns threat. Brooks may be being managed carefully due to him being injured but he has to start against PNE as he along with Soumare bring balance to the left. Agree about Campbell. Its significant he looked a different player once COH moved inside.

Three games in 6 days is difficult due to our poor conditioning but we have secured two wins. I think its Seriki who should be disappointed more than Matos that Shackelton is being preferred to him. His pace option off the bench provides a useful alternative to Ogbene. Another head scratching decision that you worry is more about shoe horning in an injury hit player to prove he was a good signing rather than using the benefit of pace. An area where we are lacking.
Bindon being on the bench is taking Seriki's place. Wilder has seen how bad Matos is and prefers Shackleton, rightly so as well.
 

Thought we where okay in patches first half, but we had nothing up front ( Cannon takes a lot of stick but Ings was no better), and not much more coming from Ogbene, the only creative spark was O Hare and he was also the only one running past someone, which was where his chance came from. Due to the lack of pace at centre half all there threat came from playing behind the full backs and they got some joy including the goal. Am sure we will sign a right back in January and shift Tanganga back across. Thought we where excellent second half, especially when Campbell came on, moved the ball quicker, more intensity and we where really comfortable. Can see the confidence coming back, Soumare and Peck looking like they will click, Cooper looking better, Burrows excellent when he came on, Like the look of Riedeweld as well
 
Always enjoy reading your reports, many thanks as always.
And fwiw I generally agree - so ok here's the but.
I think you're a bit mean when marking Peck. Bear in mind that under Seles he was usually alone and under siege. He must have felt like a roundabout with the amount of traffic going round him all the time.
At last he's got his mentor back and someone - Soumare - to replace his sadly gone minder/partner.
It seems to be a lost art to me that of properly assessing, especially a defensive midfielder's ability to anticipate and cut out passes simply by occupying the right space.
I don't think that ability can ever be measured by any stats..
So, that's just a long way round of saying I thought Peck deserved a 7. Hopefully he and Soumare can gel, then we'll have probably the best, and youngest, midfield pairing in the division., then there's 'Blaster to come....
 
I think Ings could have played in the Cannon role last night in the first half and we would have caused them so many more problems, Cannon was lackluster and gave nothing in that role, at this moment in time i would give him to the pigs as a charitable donation as then i could jointly hate them both at the same time.

It is just the fact we spent so much on him that he gets the playing time he does, hopefully some partially sighted owner will look at his highlight reels before a joined us and want to sign him and take him off our hands, fingers crossed.
 
Ratings:



Cooper 6/10 – Caught a few headers and then right on the edge of his area for another – which looked close to being handball? Kicked a few out which he seems to most games. The goal he has no chance with. After the break not sure he had anything to do – a few shots went wide. His handling was fine all night.



Ogbene 5.5/10 - Actually did at least look a threat in terms of putting in a few crosses and trying to get down that side first half but still made some poor decisions also. Defensively he did not always get in the right areas and we had gaps when they attacked. 2nd half did not see as much of him from an attacking point of view I felt but helped out more the other way.



McCallum 5/10 – Did not carry on the performance from Saturday and was relatively quiet I felt tonight. A few bits of link play but he did take the corner that led to the leveller. Burrows did really well when he came on and I do expect him to return at the start Friday but McCallum has done ok for a trio of starts.



McGuiness 6/10 – Won a few headers but also got away with a fell pulls too in the first half and almost seemed too tight – the other defenders were guilty of being too far off! He did improve as the game went on and seemed to win his battles more as they went more and more direct with long throws and balls into the box. He has been relatively steady in the last few games and maybe our best defender recent weeks?



Tanganga 5.5/10 – Ok and involved in two of our big attacking moments. Nearly scored with the hooked finish and then headed back for the equaliser. Not sure he has quite pushed on since his superb debut but I do not think the position suits him myself? He had a few loose touches and the lad De Neve had so much space between him and Ogbene. However, he stuck at his task and despite a few daft fouls, he is always aggressive and wanting to get in front of his man which I commend.



Mee 5.5/10 – Real struggle I thought for him tonight in the first half and worst he has been. He lost Ohashi constantly and seemed half asleep when the ball came through over his shoulder. They had a few chances long before they scored and on the goal was nowhere near his man – it was his man and he just lost him. He did improve after the break and became more composed and started to nip in and win things and looked more himself/composed.



Peck 6/10 – Ok performance. Nothing remarkable but he improved as the game went on. First half he seemed to be safe when he had it and felt they had too much time in the middle. Improved after the break and got amongst it and involved in a few skirmishes – which was more like the Peck we saw last season. Not sure he passed it forward much all game but did pick up some loose balls and helped us manage the game as it progressed.



Soumare 7/10 – Started with a few loose touches and seemed a bit ill disciplined (roaming around) but got better and better as the game went on. Started to get his foot in, made more progressive passes and just was more involved. The goal he forced and then had a few other attacking moments where he moved forward with the ball. Seemed to look like he belonged. Still raw but there was some glimpses of real promise tonight.



O’Hare 7/10 – His performance was again totally different first half to second. To begin with, he was on the left, the ball got away from him and he struggled to have much impact – other than the run and shot towards the end of the half. Second half he was more central and was able to get into the game more, helped press and ensure they did not get out and of course involved in the second. A lovely weighted pass that was perfect for Burrows to come onto. Overall, thought his energy and work rate really helped us massively turn it around.



Cannon 1.5/10 – The mark may seem harsh perhaps but he barely touched the ball, did not really move and just not even a nuisance. Granted the formation (with Ings seemingly behind him and O’Hare on the left) did not help and he was isolated but he has to actually move or try and anticipate. He had one decent run where he was found but his shot was weak but that was more like it. We looked much better when he came off. I think if he does play (not sure anyone wishes he would?) then you would want him in a two at least? I am not sure I would have him anywhere near the side – I would prefer likes of One or Marsh to him and his confidence seems rock bottom. I just hope Wilder does not keep playing and playing him – almost stubbornly – like he did with Brewster. No co-incidence we improved when he went off.



Ings 4/10 – He played in a sort of deeper role but it did not work. He had the one good run early on where he sort of bumbled through but after this, we saw little of him. Looked slow and tried to flick the ball rather than getting hold of it. We did not have any real threat in open play (except the O’Hare chance which he helped onto Ogbene). We improved hugely when him and Cannon left the field as we had O’Hare central and Brooks/Burrows as legitimate wide threats.



Subs -



Campbell 7/10 – Thought he looked much more like the player we saw last season in terms of his work rate and forcing defenders back. He held it up and physically did not give the defenders any time. The second goal comes from his play (he was fouled) and then of course he scores the third with a good run and finish. Even outside these moments, he just looked more himself and I thought that we played off him well too.



Brooks 6.5/10 – Like the other subs that came on around the hour mark, he contributed really well. He worked back defensively but also did show moments gong the other way. The ball for the third was sublime. Looked quite composed when he had it. Do wonder if he is better as an impact sub as seems to often struggle when he starts but him being fresh against tiring players seems to work better?



Burrows 7.5/10 – Cannot argue with a goal and an assist. He got into some great areas and they struggled to pick up. The second was very similar to some of those he scored last year, as he came onto it and picked his spot with his left foot. His cross for the third was excellent too. Looked more energetic, up for the fight and caused them problems constantly after he came on. I expect him to start on Friday night but has to keep these standards up.



Riedewald – Steady enough as we looked to see the game out and picked up a few loose bits and looked fairly composed.



Shackleton – Only on the last few minutes. Ball bounced off him twice back to them. Not a good sign for Matos, that he is being preferred as an option off the bench.



Manager: Wilder 6.5/10 – First half we were flat and his changes to the team in terms of how we played formation wise and those he brought in – did not work. We looked insipid attacking wise but also were loose in possession and they had chances/breaks where we failed to stop crosses. We did improve massively after the break with clearly words spoken and after the subs, upped it even more and went on to win comfortably in the end. We do have to try and put a more complete game together but we have been better in both the 2nd halves of tonight and last Saturday. He will hope we can start better on Friday evening. Credit to him for getting the team to get 2 big wins and hopefully the start of us moving up the table. I hope he does not keep tweaking things but maybe he was worried about 3 games in a week?





Blackburn – I thought they would struggle and think I picked them to go down and they are right where I had them to finish. They started ok but have quickly tailed off. Not sure Ishmail will remain much longer but even though he seems the classic rent-a-Championship manager – slowly they lost their better players. Szmodics left a season ago and then they have lost Travis, Wiemann, Batth, Britton, Dolan and Hyam – all who were experienced pieces that helped them challenge for the playoffs. In terms of replacing them it has been mostly unproved players at this level from overseas and it was always going to be a drop off. They still seem a bit of a mess off the pitch with the Venkys still part of the ownership group. They might stay up but it seems without investment or change, they are going to struggle to remain at this level especially when you have big spending sides coming up like Birmingham and Wrexham. It will be harder for them to stay away from trouble. Wednesday may take one spot but you worry about which other sides they could finish above – Charlton, Oxford and a few others you might be concerned about in terms of the drop – all started better.



They were ok first half and scored a goal that came from throwing bodies forward and had a few other chances like that where they did have men over but made poor choices when well placed. They were ok defensively and not put under any pressure until those two late challenges. Once they got in front, they would have hoped to go on and win their first home game but Ohashi just missed a cross and they then give away a sloppy goal. After this they never really got going again and United were the only team that looked like scoring really. The defence were getting turned and they were struggling as O’Hare, Burrows, Campbell were starting to impose themselves. The second and third both came down their right-hand side as Alebiosu and Miller struggled in the same way we had down the same area with players often spare. Burrows had the run of the park on both these goals. They seemed to run out of ideas – after a few decent moves first half – and long throws and balls pumped into the box became their only real tactic.



Opponent Man of the Match – Ohashi scored but also made a hash of a few too. The lad Gudjohnsen was their main threat as he got into good areas and put a few decent balls in. He was the main threat so glad when he went off.



Opponent Weak link – They were bigging De Neve up but he made some awful choices with the ball and even his assist for the goal was a miskick. I thought that Miller, despite his long throws (which was often just looped so had no power on them to meet) was poor and we really got down his side second half when we had the big moments. Slowly, Peck and Soumare won the midfield battle over Tronstad and Gardner Hickman.



Referee / Officials – David Webb. Reffed us in the Leeds/Burnley defeats at the end of the season but not sure he was at fault for these losses (stupid Anel penalty) and he was very good in the Leeds home game – I typed he was the best ref for ages and let things flow. He also did Watford away last season and going further back the Blackpool 3-3 draw (where both teams lost the plot!). Do recall the Stoke under Hecky when RND was brought down though and he did not give it! I like the fact he keeps his cards away and only books if he has to – the Peck one was harsh but hard to see it was just Gardner Hickman unless you had replays and after the initial push – you can understand him booking both as in a melee it would look like they both came together. No other bookings or other moments of controversy – Cooper seemed just inside his box when he caught it and then he played a very good advantage on the goal when Campbell was fouled. One of the better refs seemingly whenever we have him although very shiny (baby oil?).
thanks DB. Wilder won this! The psychology was such that when our subs came on they were keen and eager to go: Burrows was bang on it: Brooks played a brilliant pass: Campbell worked (and scored). Expect more of this. You and me see different things in O'Hare and Peck--they were non-stop---excellent. With regard to Cannon and Ings---oh dear. Cannon has shown us nothing and Ings cannot do it anymore. This will not continue much longer.
 
I think the marks for the CBs are harsh I would say all were a 7 all night long…

Tom Cannon needs to not have a numerical value rating but a word ‘tripe’ is under used nowadays

Carl Asaba did not have one good thing to say about him and that’s a fellow professional and a nice guy
He said we were playing with 10 men when he was on the pitch he apologised for being unfair.. no Carl you were spot on in your original assessment
 
It is just about getting results at the moment on this run of games against relatively poor sides. Think Preston will be more difficult on Friday and then we have Derby who also have not been great. As you say Cannon was poor again but Ings was not much better . With Cannon he reminds me of Sunday morning games where you were one player short and just got some random to make up the numbers. I do feel a little sorry for him as the service is not great meaning he sees very little of the ball. I don't think he is hiding but just does not seem to know how to try and get himself involved. His confidence must be shot and he is clearly not going to play himself into any kind of form. It would be much better to give his spot to One and let him have a few games with the under 23's and just get back to basics.
 
Our formation could be described as 4-4-1-1 or 4-2-3-1, just depending on how you like to classify the widemen. I see a lot of websites struggle to get it right. Wilder also seem to throw in stuff that could be interpreted in different ways.

There was possibly a tweak at half time in that O'Hare was given more freedom to roam when we were in possession. But when we gave up on pressing high and dropped down collectively he fell back into a wide midfield role to the left of Soumare.

The lineup below shows some lines that show a bit more what we try to do when we're in possession, as it is not quite symmetrical. We want to allow our players to do what they're good at. So even though Ogbene and O'Hare have the same starting position in a 4-4-1-1, Ogbene will hug the line and play more as an orthodox winger on the right. O'Hare is not a winger, so his role is to roam around, find space between lines and use his movement and creativity drifting in more centrally.

1761131006657.webp

Tanganga is playing more as a right back in our current formation, and he's not getting too advanced. He's primarily a defender, but he also has a winger in front of him in Ogbene, who we think can beat his man with his pace and runs. McCallum on the left doesn't have a winger in front of him, so is our main wide player, and is being urged to push forward, while O'Hare drifts inside.

To make sure we don't have areas of the pitch where nobody moves into, I think there are additional instructions. Our central striker Cannon drifts to the left (where there's no winger) more often, and Ings operated slightly more to the right, i.el not getting too much in Cannon or O'Hare's way.
 
You're assessment that the formation was wrong is spot on. Its been a feature all season. Every one could see McCallum was struggling down the left due to lack of support and that is where their goal eventually came from. Another game where we only really played for 45 minutes. It got us a much needed win and 3 points but the first half was poor. Fitness will be key to us moving away from the bottom.
I thought McCallum did OK (again). In the first half Tanganga found himself 2v1 a few times because Ogbene wasn't getting back to help.
On their goal McCallum was caught upfield when Cannon lost it cheaply (yet again) and couldn't get back. But McGuinness didn't stop the cross and Mee lost his man in the middle.
McCallum also put a couple of decent crosses in, but unlike with Burrows there was no-one there to benefit - Ings was too deep and Cannon was ... not where he should have been.
 
O'Hare MOTM for me. You can't fault his boundless energy, drive and enthusiasm.

Reminds me of a good-natured kid at school who was unfortunately always in detention for being restless and not concentrating (probably be diagnosed as ADHD these days), but we'd be hoping fingers-crossed that he'd be out of detention in time to join us to play in the school football team.
 
Had a great view behind the goal and that report is spot on again ... almost lost my voice shouting at Cannon to put some f@ckin effort in - roll on Friday hopefully with no Cannon on the pitch - UP THE BLADES
 
Our formation could be described as 4-4-1-1 or 4-2-3-1, just depending on how you like to classify the widemen. I see a lot of websites struggle to get it right. Wilder also seem to throw in stuff that could be interpreted in different ways.

There was possibly a tweak at half time in that O'Hare was given more freedom to roam when we were in possession. But when we gave up on pressing high and dropped down collectively he fell back into a wide midfield role to the left of Soumare.

The lineup below shows some lines that show a bit more what we try to do when we're in possession, as it is not quite symmetrical. We want to allow our players to do what they're good at. So even though Ogbene and O'Hare have the same starting position in a 4-4-1-1, Ogbene will hug the line and play more as an orthodox winger on the right. O'Hare is not a winger, so his role is to roam around, find space between lines and use his movement and creativity drifting in more centrally.

View attachment 224070

Tanganga is playing more as a right back in our current formation, and he's not getting too advanced. He's primarily a defender, but he also has a winger in front of him in Ogbene, who we think can beat his man with his pace and runs. McCallum on the left doesn't have a winger in front of him, so is our main wide player, and is being urged to push forward, while O'Hare drifts inside.

To make sure we don't have areas of the pitch where nobody moves into, I think there are additional instructions. Our central striker Cannon drifts to the left (where there's no winger) more often, and Ings operated slightly more to the right, i.el not getting too much in Cannon or O'Hare's way.
Our formation could be described as 4-4-1-1 or 4-2-3-1, just depending on how you like to classify the widemen. I see a lot of websites struggle to get it right. Wilder also seem to throw in stuff that could be interpreted in different ways.

There was possibly a tweak at half time in that O'Hare was given more freedom to roam when we were in possession. But when we gave up on pressing high and dropped down collectively he fell back into a wide midfield role to the left of Soumare.

The lineup below shows some lines that show a bit more what we try to do when we're in possession, as it is not quite symmetrical. We want to allow our players to do what they're good at. So even though Ogbene and O'Hare have the same starting position in a 4-4-1-1, Ogbene will hug the line and play more as an orthodox winger on the right. O'Hare is not a winger, so his role is to roam around, find space between lines and use his movement and creativity drifting in more centrally.

View attachment 224070

Tanganga is playing more as a right back in our current formation, and he's not getting too advanced. He's primarily a defender, but he also has a winger in front of him in Ogbene, who we think can beat his man with his pace and runs. McCallum on the left doesn't have a winger in front of him, so is our main wide player, and is being urged to push forward, while O'Hare drifts inside.

To make sure we don't have areas of the pitch where nobody moves into, I think there are additional instructions. Our central striker Cannon drifts to the left (where there's no winger) more often, and Ings operated slightly more to the right, i.el not getting too much in Cannon or O'Hare's way.
It was driving me mad that the Sky Sports commentator kept referring to our back 3 when it was clearly a 4 - I think he'd just assumed that was what we were going to play and didn't bother opening his eyes to check.

I was pleased we stuck with the formation after it had worked OK v Watford but I don't think we got the personnel right. Ings looked lost as a 10 and I thought we would've been better starting with Brooks wide and O'Hare as the 10. The substitutions made a huge difference and we looked a different side after Ings and Cannon were replaced. If we don't trust One (and it appears we don't -unless he's injured?), then I hope we prioritise a striker who can play as the '1' in January. I don't think that role suits Cannon or Ings and we know Campbell isn't a 90 minutes every game option.

A lot has been said about Cannon, some of which is OTT and overly simplistic and some which is more useful and accurate. He's a striker who is totally lacking in physical attributes and he needs to compensate for that through clever movement, nous and a level of aggression - like Billy Sharp had to. He's definitely lacking in terms of aggression (maybe partly due to a lack of confidence) but he does show some (but not enough) signs of good movement (one run in particular last night stands out in my memory). I'm just not sure the way we play suits the striker who's looking to get on defenders' shoulders around the box and get rolled in with through balls that he can hit first time or early. Obviously that puts a huge question mark over why we signed him. I remember thinking the same about Scott Hogan who was constantly looking for a ball in behind in a side that liked to be more patient in its build up. Hopefully he can be moved on in January (I'm sure there will be Championship sides willing to take a risk on him given his previous goal record, even if it's just on loan) and replaced with more of a target man type.
 

My ratings and thoughts

Cooper. 6 no chance with the goal, had little else to do.

Ogbene 4. One of the few Things we did well in the first half was get the ball to Ogbene in space but he was able able to do little with it, having said that the forwards in front of him game him few options.. not convinced he’s defensively sound enough to be wing back

McCallum. 5 not as good as he was in his two previous appearances got caught out and let the Rovers wingers get crosses in too easily at times

McGuiness. 7 Our best defender on the night, looks to be finding his feet and his confidence a bit, albeit Blackburn played to his strengths letting him head crosses away all night rather than running at him.

Tanganga 6. Okay made a few decent challenges but I think he’s currently more comfortable in a 2 than a 3

Mee 5. Reads the game well but looked to be physically struggling from about 30 mins in, was way behind the play on their goal.. two games in a week looks to be hard for him, bit of a decision to make for Friday as to if he starts

Peck 7. His best game of the season, back to where he was last season at times, looks more confident with a footballer along side him.

Soumare 7.5. He’s raw but the talent is there, he can not only break up play he also can progress the ball positively when in possession, needs to be careful of his tackling technique as those studs showing tackles if he mis-times them could be Red cards in this day.

O’Hare 8. my MOTM got on the ball as he often does but this time didn’t run up blind alleys with it, weirdly looks liberated when his great mate Hamer is not playing, one of his best performances for us.

Cannon 1. Sigh… I have given him zero a few times this season but he did win one clever flick on and had a shot on target so I’ll be kind and give him a point… but let’s all be honest he looks a dreadful, dreadful footballer.. I don’t see a single strength in his game, he seems to actively avoid going where the ball is. Please find another club for him in January this is painful for everyone concerned.

Ings 3. Not great but at times was dropping deep and almost tried to be like Harry Kane in a Gareth Southgate side which is not his bag at all. At least he tried to get involved unlike his “strike” partner.

Subs -

Campbell 7. Another with his best performance of the season took his goal well and heavily involved in our second When he plays like that he’s a real game changer off the bench, the issue is if we start him in a game and he gasses out on 60 minutes what do we do?

Brooks 7. When we had JRS on the right last season I was begging to see us try Brooks on the left at the same time and it never happened .. hey guess what? A player with a good left foot look naturally at home on the left.. go figure.

Burrows 8. His best 30 minutes in a Blades shirt for me, I have been heavily critical of him (not only this season) but last night when he came on he delivered everything we were promised from his Peterborough days.. more of that please.

Riedewald 5. Did what he had to to help see the game out.

Shackleton n/a.

Wilder. 6. Loses a point for starting Cannon, but for once his subs made the difference and won us the game. And points are everything at the moment.


Summary.

After a wretched game of football first half, we picked it up second and the subs deservedly won us the game. Bigger test are around the corner, Blackburn were terrible, so let’s not get carried away, survival is still the aim after our start but two vital wins on the bounce gives us cause for hope.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom