Brooks (and Brooks) will tear you apart

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Probably our best option for that left-sided number 10 while Hamer is injured.

An assist last Saturday and involved in the build up to our 2nd tonight, should give him a good confidence boost.
 
Probably our best option for that left-sided number 10 while Hamer is injured.

An assist last Saturday and involved in the build up to our 2nd tonight, should give him a good confidence boost.

I just think he seems to do better coming on as a sub. When we start him he drifts out of matches.
 
Probably our best option for that left-sided number 10 while Hamer is injured.

An assist last Saturday and involved in the build up to our 2nd tonight, should give him a good confidence boost.
Baffling why he didn't start tonight. CW fucked up by moving Cal to the left to accommodate the abysmal Cannon, much better when he came on
 
Baffling why he didn't start tonight. CW fucked up by moving Cal to the left to accommodate the abysmal Cannon, much better when he came on
Coming back from injury and needs to wait his turn. His best performances since stepping up ti 1st team have come as an impact player. Team selection and and subs worked perfectly.
 
Coming back from injury and needs to wait his turn. His best performances since stepping up ti 1st team have come as an impact player. Team selection and and subs worked perfectly.
I don't think starting Cannon can be seen as correct
 
He's better off the bench. Doesn't do enough from the start for whatever reason. Thought he made a difference last two games after coming on. There is a player there but he has to decide whether he ends up top end champ or drifting down the leagues due to inconsistency. The talent is certainly there.
 
Weird that when he’s played in the position he’s played in for most of his life, he looks half decent.

Exactly.

Any number of comments on various threads about Brooks being an “impact player”, more suited to coming on as a substitute.

How long is it since he actually started a game playing left side?

I stand to be corrected but my recollection is it was in the Premier League season. Last season he seemed to start exclusively wide right.
 

Exactly.

Any number of comments on various threads about Brooks being an “impact player”, more suited to coming on as a substitute.

How long is it since he actually started a game playing left side?

I stand to be corrected but my recollection is it was in the Premier League season. Last season he seemed to start exclusively wide right.
Even in the PL he was playing centrally a lot of the time.
 
Even in the PL he was playing centrally a lot of the time.
Brooks played wide left in a midfield 5 in the first 7 matches of Wilder's return: from the 0-2 against Liverpool to the 2-2 draw against West Ham draw.
 
Another good cameo, would be happy to see him start at PNE.
 
Brooks played wide left in a midfield 5 in the first 7 matches of Wilder's return: from the 0-2 against Liverpool to the 2-2 draw against West Ham draw.
He played on the left hand side of a central midfield 3, in a 4-3-3. Archer, McAtee etc were the wingers/forwards. So a 'number 8' in his first games. Then RW in a 4-2-3-1 last year. I've never seem him play left wing until this year. Last night after the subs we seemed to be 4-2-3-1 in attack/4-4-2 in defence
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom