Restricted Budget

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Why would this lad have the lowdown on Sheffield United above established journalists?

View attachment 215562
Aye
Because he’s a “journalist “ (with a 1st from the 79th ‘best University in Britain)
In “ Football Journalism” to boot.
Begs the question what are the specifics that differentiate “football journalism” from ‘ordinary’ reporting?
I’m guessing there’s a ‘module’ on spouting bollocks to the gullible” - albeit, on reflection, that’s the standard tool of trade for every hack ever, irrespective of your specialism.
At a slight tangent, (any) evaluation of the Fourth Estate should reflect on the following ‘achievement / appointment / ‘accolade(s)
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6458.webp
    IMG_6458.webp
    70.5 KB · Views: 40

If only we'd kept Sir Wilder we'd have signed all the best players and be on course for 160 points this season sitwell says.
 
But no I didnt , your obsession with me is a bit weird.
He would have signed some players and we would have gone up in my opinion, I thought that was our aim, apparently not.
I am behind Selles but the Wilder part is a terrible decision.
Wilder was also great at bringing young players through, hope Selles follows suit.
 
Nobody does outside of Wilder and the board. But we all agree £10m was a substantial fee for the Championship in January. An outlay like that, when we'd just lost a vital defender, would surely come with some justification that it was necessary at least?
Not arguing that

The poster made a point that Wider said it would guarantee promotion
 
But no I didnt , your obsession with me is a bit weird.
He would have signed some players and we would have gone up in my opinion, I thought that was our aim, apparently not.
I am behind Selles but the Wilder part is a terrible decision.
Wilder was also great at bringing young players through, hope Selles follows suit.
Tbh

Time will tell if it’s a terrible decision
 
It makes sense to go for frees and loans at this early stage. Then if we don’t get in right targets, spend money. No point spending money if we don’t need to.
 

Aye
Because he’s a “journalist “ (with a 1st from the 79th ‘best University in Britain)
In “ Football Journalism” to boot.
Begs the question what are the specifics that differentiate “football journalism” from ‘ordinary’ reporting?
I’m guessing there’s a ‘module’ on spouting bollocks to the gullible” - albeit, on reflection, that’s the standard tool of trade for every hack ever, irrespective of your specialism.
At a slight tangent, (any) evaluation of the Fourth Estate should reflect on the following ‘achievement / appointment / ‘accolade(s)
Acclaimed by who ffs?
 
Since time began all our best players have been free or cost naff all

We could go mental and end up like them lot in south Barnsley
Hang on there , we paid £40k for Brian Deane you know.
We're not tight of wallet.
 
It makes sense to go for frees and loans at this early stage. Then if we don’t get in right targets, spend money. No point spending money if we don’t need to.
Yep, spending money at this stage of the window only makes sense if you have a specific target. But at this level there's usually more than one player available that can fill a need.
Only the clubs really high up the food chain do this kind of business early because they have specific players in mind.
 
Our budget may well be tight but I'm sure the £9.5mil profit from Souza will be reinvested, after all we've free up money on the wage bill selling him and losing Brewster.
What about the £20m loss on Brewster which more than cancels out your profit on Souza.
And then there's the £3m on Gbric ...
 
Aye
Because he’s a “journalist “ (with a 1st from the 79th ‘best University in Britain)
In “ Football Journalism” to boot.
Begs the question what are the specifics that differentiate “football journalism” from ‘ordinary’ reporting?
I’m guessing there’s a ‘module’ on spouting bollocks to the gullible” - albeit, on reflection, that’s the standard tool of trade for every hack ever, irrespective of your specialism.
At a slight tangent, (any) evaluation of the Fourth Estate should reflect on the following ‘achievement / appointment / ‘accolade(s)
Martin Samuel is the biggest cunt of the lot.
 
Well, we better hope Selles can get a tune out of Cannon then.

We seem to have spunked the vast majority of any budget on him. And he’s provided zero so far , we cannot have him being an albatross ruining future recruitment.

Frees and loans isn’t a way to build a team for promotion
 
With the pigs situation getting lots of publicity there are gonna be more than a few clubs drawing in their horns this summer.
Our parachutes finish next summer and the motto
"Hope for the best - Plan for the worst"
comes to mind.
We can't afford to take on too many new contracts at high wages which will last for a few years beyond parachute expiry.
And we certainly should not be chucking big fees around.

Don't forget that transfer fees are paid in instalments and they will still need paying in our "post-parachute" future.

That's what got us into trouble with the PL/EFL on the instalments for Brewster's fee and possibly the fees of some others.
 
Yes and no. We've paid off the fee for Brewster over the length of his contract so we owed nothing when he was released, so we're still £9.5mil profit up from Souza.
 
Frees and loans is the best way forward right now so long as some of the deals we get done are permanents.

Championship clubs rarely sign players from other championship clubs for large fees. Most move for free with a decent signing on / salary. The likes of O’Hare.

Plenty has come off the wage bill so we should be able to compete with anyone in the division salary wise.

Picks out of lower leagues will probably be considered lower fees and fit in fine with that model.

The young and talented premier league players we’ll be aiming for will most likely be loans with possible option / obligations to buy.

I really see no issue here. A couple of astute free signings and another 4 quality premier league loans would have us looking strong.
 
With the pigs situation getting lots of publicity there are gonna be more than a few clubs drawing in their horns this summer.
Our parachutes finish next summer and the motto
"Hope for the best - Plan for the worst"
comes to mind.
We can't afford to take on too many new contracts at high wages which will last for a few years beyond parachute expiry.
And we certainly should not be chucking big fees around.

Don't forget that transfer fees are paid in instalments and they will still need paying in our "post-parachute" future.

That's what got us into trouble with the PL/EFL on the instalments for Brewster's fee and possibly the fees of some others.
Losing Brewster and Souza will have freed up some considerable wages (same when we let the higher earners go last summer in Mcburnie, Egan etc) even if we've still got some players on big wages here, like T Davies, Hamer, Moore etc.

Can't imagine the 3 A.I lads will be on big wages, same with Arblaster, Peck, Seriki and Brooks.
 
Last edited:
Losing Brewster and Souza will have freed up some considerable wages (same when we let the higher earners go last summer in Mcburnie, Egan etc) even if we've still got some players on big wages here, like T Davies, Hamer, Moore etc.

Can't imagine the 3 A.I lads will be on big wages, same with Arblaster, Peck, Seriki and Brooks.
Yes , that all helps , I agree and it's how we spend it that counts , not how much.
Any analyst looking at Wilder's January would sack him on the spot.
I'm amazed it took the board so long - for Americans , they showed an unusual degree of sensitivity.
 
Gone from no leaks and click bait in the first two replies to it being confirmed that's what we are looking at right now 24 hours later 🤣
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom