Danny_Blade
Active Member
Could we potentially start to lose them or would you say that the club has properly established them (barring going back down to L1 or worse)?
In the potential scenario that the club doesn't do anything in the next few years (i.e. not just return to the PL but finally establish or reach/win a cup final) because if we don't then you could argue the club hasn't progressed during this whole time (haven't progressed in that we're still a second tier club that has few and very brief spells in the top flight so no real difference from what the club was back in the late 90's). Weren't our average home attendances back then around 16k - 18k? You can add another 10k - 12k which rounds off the current average and its these fans I'm more specifically talking about.
No real progress after a substantial amount of time (quarter of a century) = lose 'em eventually, or the club has most likely sustained them despite everything - which one is it?
For me, a big factor in this is whether our new owners can finally push the club on from underachieving for the vast majority of the last 50 years. Although it's still very early in their tenure they may and hopefully turn out to be the wealthiest/astute owners (albeit collectively at least) this club has ever had, although previous club owners wealth isn't a particularly high bar to begin with.
In the potential scenario that the club doesn't do anything in the next few years (i.e. not just return to the PL but finally establish or reach/win a cup final) because if we don't then you could argue the club hasn't progressed during this whole time (haven't progressed in that we're still a second tier club that has few and very brief spells in the top flight so no real difference from what the club was back in the late 90's). Weren't our average home attendances back then around 16k - 18k? You can add another 10k - 12k which rounds off the current average and its these fans I'm more specifically talking about.
No real progress after a substantial amount of time (quarter of a century) = lose 'em eventually, or the club has most likely sustained them despite everything - which one is it?
For me, a big factor in this is whether our new owners can finally push the club on from underachieving for the vast majority of the last 50 years. Although it's still very early in their tenure they may and hopefully turn out to be the wealthiest/astute owners (albeit collectively at least) this club has ever had, although previous club owners wealth isn't a particularly high bar to begin with.