United 1 Crawley 1 - report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,264
Reaction score
35,196
Sheffield United ended a 6 match losing streak with a draw at home to Crawley Town and got off the bottom of the division as they finally registered a goal. Marlon King’s second half finish gave parity after Jamie Proctor’s first half header from a well worked Crawley move.



In truth a draw was probably a fair result after Crawley shaded the first half before United were on the ascendancy in the second half. The home side would have been disappointed once again with their overall performance with the slow tempo and lack of penetration features of another limp showing. United may have got a point but in truth it was another lacklustre showing. It may give manager Weir another stay of execution for at least a week but time is running out rapidly for the rookie boss to put in a complete performance and a winning result.



United brought in new signing Simon Lappin at the expense of Matt Hill; with Murphy back on the bench. Crawley included former Blades Kyle McFadzean and Billy Clarke in their starting line up and were 5 unbeaten as opposed to the home side’s 6 game losing streak.



United began slowly and the crowd were soon frustrated as sloppy passing and lacklustre play saw Crawley on the offensive. Clarke had an effort deflected over and then the visitors won a corner as the Blades struggled to get any kind of ascendancy. United finally broke out and won a free kick but Hall’s effort was comfortable for Jones. Crawley had been the brighter side and a clever move led to the opener. A short corner saw Clarke back heel into the path of Drury whose cross was perfect for PROCTOR to nod home unopposed. It was a well worked goal from Crawley but sloppy defending from United who let an unopposed cross come in and a free header. The groans from most of the Lane after the goal were inevitable as the small band of Crawley fans celebrated.



Untied tried to respond but were actually still on the back foot as Clarke nearly got in and Sadler then shot wide as the frustration grew on the terraces. Sadler and McMahon were booked after tussling before Collins then glanced wide in a rare opening from the disappointing home side. Cuvelier had been pretty anonymous but picked up a knock and was replaced by Coady.



Crawley had been by far the busier and more enterprising side and both Proctor and Adams had efforts shortly before the Blades had an appeal for hand ball waved away. Soon after they were lustily booed off the field at the half time whistle. It had been dreadful fare and United were deservedly behind.



United had another appeal for a penalty but this one was more half hearted as Doyle’s effort hit Jones. Soon after McMahon finally had a decent effort on goal for the Blades but his well struck shot glanced the inside of the post and bounced away. It was a fortunate let off for the visitors who then went on the offensive and Maguire held off Adams with Crawley this time appealing for a spot kick. Clarke had an effort saved by Long.



United made a change with Weir putting on Taylor for Hall and going more offensive. They seemed to be employing two up front with Taylor supplanting King. Coady had one run thwarted and was forcing the home side forward and his pass led to Brandy picking out KING inside the left hand channel who slotted past Jones. Many United fans reacted with surprise as much as excitement that they had finally seen a goal! It had been a decent move and well made and finished.



United tried to build on this and had another penalty appeal as Brandy went down before Collins headed over and the Taylor sliced wide. The crowd finally responded and Coady drove forward again having his near post shot turned round the post by Jones.



Brandy came off for Murphy as the game entered the final stages and United tried to force a winner. Crawley made several changes as they tried to slow things down. However the visitors nearly broke before Maguire’s last ditch tackle thwarted Clarke. United tried to have one final push but after Murphy’s low shot was saved they could not muster a meaningful efforts despite winning two late corners and the final whistle came soon after.



United – The first half was really poor. It was as bad as anything else we have seen in the recent run and we have seen some dreadful performances in the run. Crawley scored a good goal but it was poorly defended. They nearly scored a few more and were sharper, quicker and more determined. We looked clueless. We gave the ball away, did not win loose balls and created nothing. It was dire.



Second half we improved. McMahon hit a post and Coady gave us some forward thinking play and we at least tried to get it into the last third and turn the opposition. We scored a decent goal but then after this I never felt we really pushed on and did not create that many more chances. I felt with almost half an hour to go we would really have a go and pen them back but it never really happened and we only had half chances and a few token appeals for penalties.



Overall the draw was about right and you could not say United did enough to win and Crawley had as many chances as us over the 90 minutes. Even second half they had as many opportunities as us on the break and I felt it was so slow for us to get into the last third even considering the improvements.



For the most part it was poor. We were slow, ponderous and unimaginative. We created little and were too slow to get anywhere near the last third. I felt for much of the game we were second to the ball or when we had it were so sloppy. We could not even do the basics right; namely pressing, tackling and effort let alone simple passes and movement. It was wretched for an hour. We did get a bit better but that was more percentage stuff as much as the passing game suddenly working. The goal was decent but it was more due to transferring it forward quickly and a decent ball from Brandy than patient, controlled football in the build up.



I never felt even after the goal we would suddenly up it a gear and start creating chance after chance. It was still slow and meandering. I never felt we would suddenly create chances and everything was so narrow. We never got it wide and even with two up front, it was all very congested and more just hopeful stuff than any meaningful play with clever balls or crosses.



It is poor to watch and I feel we will have a lot of games like that where we may get an odd goal or point but never do enough to create a series of chances. Whilst at the other end we look like we may concede as teams come at us with quicker pace and more conviction.



We now have a tough away game minus two key players and then two more home games where I see more of the same as tonight. If we cannot get behind teams and create chances we are going to struggle as we lose much of the first and second balls in the middle of the field and then when we finally get the ball take an age to move the ball from side to side and eventually forward. It is all so slow and pedestrian and painstaking to watch.



Weir may survive another week or so but I see no tangible sign of improvement. The fact some coming out seemed happy with a draw versus Crawley shows how far we have fallen.



Crawley - First half they were good. They scored an excellent goal which was right off the training ground. They then could have had a few more too and were quicker and more determined to the loose ball and far more positive in their attacking approach. Second half as United came back they sat back and after we scored they started to time waste and almost settle for a draw. I found this odd as the few times they did attack or break they nearly scored. They would have been better attacking than defending as they may have got another. Overall they deserved a draw as they had as many chances and as much of the ball I felt. They maybe were hanging on or had settled for a draw but it was not like we created chance after chance at the end and I felt they saw us off after the leveller more comfortably than they should have.



Another side that looked relatively ordinary but many of the teams look much of a muchness. None look superb but many seem better organised and more cohesive and hard working than us. So regardless of talent these teams have a head start due to such organisational qualities and if we cannot show more subtlety or creativity in the last third than teams will see off our lack of penetration rather easily.



Opposition star man – Nicky Adams. Always impressed me in the games last season and now this. Tricky wing man who works hard, gets up and down and shows a decent touch and ability on the ball.



Opposition weak link – Noone stood out as particularly weak. They were all workmanlike. Nothing special but worked for each other and deserved their draw.

 



Long 7/10 – Had little chance on the goal as he was left badly exposed. Cannot remember many other chances they had really but he made a few standard saves throughout the game



McMahon 7/10 –Got stupidly involved in a tussle with Sadler which led to yet another unnecessary booking. In the game itself he was a mixed bag with some decent attacking play including a shot which was unlucky when hit the post. Defensively at times he gave his winger too much time. Felt on the goal he stood motionless as the scorer came across to head home easily. However second half showed some real gusto as he got forward and showed some determination and became more of a right winger than full back.



Lappin 4/10 - Sadly,thought he was wretched. Defensively he lost his man and gave way too much time (goal came thought him losing his man who crossed unopposed). He sliced the ball several times and seemed unable to do even do the basics such as a simple pass or piece of control. Not a good debut.



Maguire 6.5/10 – Steady enough game. Nearly gave a penalty away at one point but then made an excellent late tackle to deny Clarke. He was better than he has been at times this season and cannot recall too many glaring mistakes.



Collins 6/10 – Thought he was slow at times and did not always react to danger. He gave away a few unnecessary corners or fouls. He did improve in the second half as the whole defence seemed to make a conscious effort to push up win more and he started to win tackles/headers.



Doyle 6/10 – Once again sure he will be criticised and yes he did give the ball away a few times or miscontrolled things but he did not hide and kept plugging away. He was only average but was not our worst player and as I say he kept looking for the ball and one of the few that put his foot in.



Baxter 6/10 – Flitted in and out of the game. He shows some nice touches at times but the game bypasses him for long stretches too and he needs to be more involved. His set plays and crosses were a mixed bag too and he needs to be more consistent in all phases of his game.



Cuvelier – Quite anonymous for the first half hour or so he played as Crawley dominated the midfield winning all the loose balls. We improved after he limped off as Coady gave us a bit of bite and forward thinking play. Not seen anything at all from Cuvelier to impress me other than some fans comments of ‘he was good on loan at Walsall.’



Hall 5/10 – Poor tonight I felt. He did not get much service but felt he did not get on the ball much or show enough desire. Game kind of floated by and barely recall him having many touches as all the United side disappointed first half. He went off on the hour which was not a surprise but at that point any one of eleven could have had the hook.



Brandy 6.5/10- He tried to get on the ball and tried to carry the fight but had little service and when he did have the ball his runs often petered out. At least he did try and have a go and was one of the few to carry the ball forward and try and turn defenders. I still feel an end product in terms of a decent cross, pass or shot is lacking in most cases but then he did provide the pass for the King goal so at least we had an assist tonight.



King 7/10 – He had little to no service all game and was playing up front on his owns starved of crosses, passes or anything really. A few times it stuck whilst a few times the ball shot away. He did take his goal really well and at times looked like he could be the battering ram we needed with others feeding off him but he needs to get fitter.





Subs



Coady 6.5/10 – Thought he did quite well and looked like he cared as he got on the ball, made a few forward passes and had a few shots. Not scintillating but at least showed some desire and forward thinking play. Had a few efforts and tried to get in the last third.



Taylor – He ran around a lot and just by being there he meant we had at least two up front. In his play he was weak and so many times the defender won headers with barely a challenge put on him. He needs to show more strength and determination. Had one weak shot wide and looks no closer to scoring but that is as much the service and tactics as his forlorn play. However he did put effort in and by just being busy and helping King we got more chances.



Murphy – Came on at the end and had one shot that never looked like going in turned round the post by Weir.





Weir rating 3/10 – Still not good. First half he was closer to 0/10 as the same slow, pedestrian and unthreatening football led to no chances, us giving the ball away and losing a sloppy goal. We could have let more in. It was dire and the crowd gave him full barrels at half time.



Second half was better as we showed more urgency. We had to. We finally changed things somewhat with 2 up top and got a goal. I would have liked more width and more attacking threat after this but it all became a bit narrow and scrappy and we never looked like blowing the house down and it kind of just frittered out to a stalemate despite us looking the more convincing.



It is a frank admission of how bad we are that a point at home v Crawley probably keeps him in a job for another few weeks but I still saw no real tangible sign of improvements as players mostly looked uncomfortable, lacking in confidence and belief that how they were told to play was going to work. I am still totally unconvinced that the way he has us playing; mixed with players mostly underperforming will see any immediate upturn and a point v Crawley with another so-so to poor performance says we are no nearer forward. The fact we did not lose for the 7th game was seen as something positive when in isolation it is another unacceptable performance and result.



Officials – Referee: Paul Tierney. Fine. He booked McMahon and Sadler for handbags, and booked a couple of other Crawley players for niggly fouls. In overall play we continually shouted for handballs but I did not think any were that convincing and many were hit at them from close range. He maybe did not stamp out on some blatant time wasting but overall I cannot say he affected anything of note all game.



Crowd/Atmosphere – 15,401 was more than I thought was in the Lane. Crawley brought a hundred at best but there seemed less in overall I felt than the announced crowd. First half saw a number of negative groans and moans as the performance sadly merited. The boos at half times suggested he had a half to save his job. We were better second half and the goal and more effort and at least some kind of attacks in the last third saw a more positive response but still felt many were less than happy by full time.
 
Agree with a lot of it but felt it was Taylor's best showing to date, by far. He held it up well and looked a lot stronger than he has done previously.

Baxter seemed to get into the game more when he dropped into central midfield and I thought the side looked a lot more balanced 2nd half, though I had no idea what sort of formation we were playing!
 
Agree with a lot of it but felt it was Taylor's best showing to date, by far. He held it up well and looked a lot stronger than he has done previously.


Agreed, I actually thought Taylor won the most balls since arriving at the club. He wasn't fantastic by any stretch, but he looked more lively and eager to have an impact.

In my opinion Hall was one of only a couple first half actually trying to do something rather than hiding. A number of times he drifted into the middle and frustrated with a lack of options around him attacked the defender, stretching play slightly and looking to actually do something of note. Again, not a fantastic performance by any stretch, but thought he was one of the better players today.

Thought Tierney and his linesman in front of John Street were poor today too, not for the handball shouts (though one in front of us was blatent with him staring straight at it), but for a complete lack of control on the game and inconsistency with decisions.
 
Is it just me that can't really see what Baxter and Brandy bring to the table? Baxter is slow and can't even dart a yard one way to make space to receive the ball. He's either not fit yet or plain slow. He's quick to get rid but is supposed to be the creative influence isn't he? He played one good through ball today and nothing else. Brandy flatters to deceive for me. Murphy did more in three minutes in terms of penetration and yet I feel in some sections Brandy is seen as a major influence. If he could hit an open net and pass after beating a man he'd be a lot better.

All in all I thought we did well to finish in the ascendancy as I thought they looked fitter, quicker and better organised than us. Without wanting to slag us off sometimes you have to respect other teams and for a team new to the league and presumably with small resources, I think Barker has got a half decent team there. We could do with a Billy Clarke too.
 
I like Baxter and Brandy, and to say he's about as tall as Del Geary Brandy can jump like a leaping salmon. Unlike King, who when he jumps looks like Sandi Toksvig* - his head ends up lower than if he'd just stood still.

*Except for the being white, and a lesbotic.
 
Baxter was a diffenrent player once we had 2 up front ,most of the team were though. Why the fuck Weir cant see this is beyond me and will result in him failing as a manager. The players were obviously more comfortable and we actually attacked. The fist half formation leaves the lone striker too much to do and he just gets knackered and its easy for the midfielders to hide or leave it to each other.
I think Taylor is trying too hard ,he desperately needs a goal ,but I thought he did Ok. Lappin was left on his own with no protection as Brandy never bothered to turn up.
 
definite hand ball first half. That said though I do think they should have had one second half
 
Agree with a lot of it but felt it was Taylor's best showing to date, by far. He held it up well and looked a lot stronger than he has done previously.

Baxter seemed to get into the game more when he dropped into central midfield and I thought the side looked a lot more balanced 2nd half, though I had no idea what sort of formation we were playing!


I thought it was 4 - 1 - 3 - 2 myself. Doyle sat in front of the back 4 and Taylor upfront with King and IMO we looked a lot better after the substitution (relatively speaking ... ) and suddenly Crawley's defenders has something to thing about with 2 up front.

I can see this working better for us than 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 which I think with the players we have, actually makes the defence sit back with having few outlets.

As a system 4 - 2 - 3 - 1 (not my favourite system) is great if you have top, top players using this system of course.
My fave? 3 - 5 - 2, with the right players of course. I used this when captaining our house 2nd XI at school and we were invincible!
 
I'm not one for sensationalist remarks but that 1st half was one of the worst performances I can remember in my 50 odd years of watching SUFC. Outplayed in all departments, individual battles lost all over the field, a team that was totally at odds with itself and individuals who had not stomach for the situation. At half time I truly thought David Weir would go today. (maybe he still will?)
Second half was still not acceptable but nowhere near as bad as the car crash 1st half. Some players showed the required mettle in this situation - led by Doyle (who has my utmost admiration for his commitment and bravery), McMahon (who looks like he cares at least!) plus Collins & Maguire who always buy in to the effort line. King needs someone nearer to him to exploit his undoubted ability in this division.
The rest - Brandy, flatters to deceive too often, Baxter - Ditto! Cu I believe, wasn't that hurt, he was being subbed anyway IMO as he was culpable for some of Crawley's freedom in front of our back four. He wasn't happy and never even offered his hand to Coady on leaving the field.
Possibly one of the worst ever Blades debuts came from Lappin, weak, nervous, unsure in his passing and made Marcus Williams look half decent, says it all really.
The one positive for me was the way we celebrated the goal, the players seemed to include Weir and all his staff in the 'joy'....... a sign of togetherness maybe ??(that I thought was never there).
A long long way to go and not much confidence from me that we have the vehicle for the journey :(
 
Thanks as ever DB. Think you were generous on marks for (non-over) Lappin. Possibly the worst performance ever from a Blades debutant. Thought Taylor did quite well on his introduction compared to his previous powder puff performances.

I also thought the crowd (on the kop at least) were remarkably up beat, even after going one down.
 
I like Baxter and Brandy, and to say he's about as tall as Del Geary Brandy can jump like a leaping salmon. Unlike King, who when he jumps looks like Sandi Toksvig* - his head ends up lower than if he'd just stood still.

*Except for the being white, and a lesbotic.

That comment has made my day. thank you
 
Brandy can't wait to hit the deck, if someone looks at him he is down! Don't like it at all sorry!
 
I'm not one for sensationalist remarks but that 1st half was one of the worst performances I can remember in my 50 odd years of watching SUFC. Outplayed in all departments, individual battles lost all over the field, a team that was totally at odds with itself and individuals who had not stomach for the situation. At half time I truly thought David Weir would go today. (maybe he still will?)
Second half was still not acceptable but nowhere near as bad as the car crash 1st half. Some players showed the required mettle in this situation - led by Doyle (who has my utmost admiration for his commitment and bravery), McMahon (who looks like he cares at least!) plus Collins & Maguire who always buy in to the effort line. King needs someone nearer to him to exploit his undoubted ability in this division.
The rest - Brandy, flatters to deceive too often, Baxter - Ditto! Cu I believe, wasn't that hurt, he was being subbed anyway IMO as he was culpable for some of Crawley's freedom in front of our back four. He wasn't happy and never even offered his hand to Coady on leaving the field.
Possibly one of the worst ever Blades debuts came from Lappin, weak, nervous, unsure in his passing and made Marcus Williams look half decent, says it all really.
The one positive for me was the way we celebrated the goal, the players seemed to include Weir and all his staff in the 'joy'....... a sign of togetherness maybe ??(that I thought was never there).
A long long way to go and not much confidence from me that we have the vehicle for the journey :(
Absolutely spot on, exactly my feelings. Though I hope Brandy could do better as he does scare defenders with his pace. Shame he didn't have the opportunity too much last night.
 

'I've got a problem here........I can hold it.......'

Wha'ts the next avatar theme this week to inspire us to victory?
 
I'm not one for sensationalist remarks but that 1st half was one of the worst performances I can remember in my 50 odd years of watching SUFC.


I didn't even think it was the worst 45 minutes this season :(
 
I didn't even think it was the worst 45 minutes this season :(
You've more than likely seen us more than me this season Coops (just home games for me). At HT last night I was totally and thoroughly pissed off at the 45mins that had gone before. Comparisons with the darker days of Haslam and the likes of Craig Renwick, Mike Guy, John Flood & Dougie Brown :(
 
It was the first time that I have seen Hall and thought he was dreadful. All he appeared to do when he received the ball was turn round, fall over and give the ball away.
Brandy was dire - he could give King lessons in how to jump and win headers though as he won a few in the air.
I thought King (jumping / not jumping for headers apart ) did well, he was woefully unsupported and on a couple of occasions had to cope with Exocet missiles wellied into his chest.

I have seen a lot worse than that performance tonight, even worse than the first half. The current position and previous performances this season, seem to make it look worse than it was. I'm not saying it was good mind.
 

that's going to be a challenge getting all those in one little picture
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom