I guess thats the way we look at things differently.
McBurnie got his stats against Man City, Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea etc, while Moore got his against Middlesbrough, Plymouth, Hull and QPR etc
In my opinion, the only comparable stat is the appearances (which looks to favour Moore), as he was only at Ipswich half a season so looked to be available more.
Yep. McBurnie was doing much the same in a much less successful team producing fewer chances against exponentially harder opposition. That the raw numbers are basically the same should tell you everything you need to know about the relative talents of the two players. Naturally, the one that the numbers say is objectively better is the one that much of the fanbase wants to fuck off, while they have a stiffy for the worse one!