Player Suggestion Cameron Archer

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

GymClassHero

GymClassHero

Active Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2018
Messages
1,124
Reaction score
2,144
Why are we not looking at him? Unlikely to get many minutes at Villa this season, would answer our creativity issues. I'm thinking he'd have a similar impact as MGW at Forest
 

GymClassHero said:
Why are we not looking at him? Unlikely to get many minutes at Villa this season, would answer our creativity issues. I'm thinking he'd have a similar impact as MGW at Forest
Click to expand...
He's not available apparently.
Seems Villa need a few home grown players in their squad.
 
Villa going for Rogers, does that mean Archer might be staying
 
Pintor75 said:
Villa going for Rogers, does that mean Archer might be staying
Click to expand...

Surely not

1) Archer not exactly getting lots of playing time under Wilder
2) We need that money back badly when we go down
 
He's not very Good though is he?
His pressing is lundstram esque
He telegraphs his sole intention to get it on his right foot and shoot
He's too slow
Not strong enough
Lazy
Greedy
No left foot
Takes too many touches
Apart from that gerrim signed
 
Villa considering selling Ramsey to raise funds to meet profit & sustainability regulations, according to bbc football, hope they've enough to pay us back
 
mattbianco1 said:
But...

They could accept a bid for him the day after he re-signs.

"Go on then Chris, chuck us £10m and he's yours!"
Click to expand...
I'd expect Villa to receive better bids than that for him - the newly promoted clubs are likely to be keen.

Also, not sure why Archer would be so desperate to stay at Utd (on reduced wages) especially when he's being played out of position.

He'll go back as per the agreement, Souza and Anel will leave, and McAtee will return to Man City. That quite a few holes Wilder will need to fill with limited funds
 
Last edited:
Pintor75 said:
Villa considering selling Ramsey to raise funds to meet profit & sustainability regulations, according to bbc football, hope they've enough to pay us back
Click to expand...
Imagine if they got themselves into a position where they went over FFP/PSR because they were obliged to repay us - would be pretty funny (though really stupid from them).
 
Mouth of the South said:
I'd expect Villa to receive better bids than that for him - the newly promoted clubs are likely to be keen.

Also, not sure why Archer would be so desperate to stay at Utd (on reduced wages) especially when he's being played out of position.

He'll go back as per the agreement, Souza and Anel will leave, and McAtee will return to Man City. That quite a few holes Wilder will need to fill with limited funds
Click to expand...
I think if Archer, Souza and Anel are sold, I can't see funds being a significant issue for the rebuild.
We're roughly at cost zero for this season, factoring our FFP loan of Archer so I'd have thought at least £20-30m would be available for the rebuild, if those players are sold for a sensible value, it just depends on where the manager wants to spend it, fees or (loan) wages?
 
Last edited:
Archer won’t be sold to anyone other than Villa, when we’re relegated. We’ve basically loaned him for a season.

I’m not sure why people are including him in any championship plan. Wilder certainly doesn’t seem to be.
 

brownblade said:
Imagine if they got themselves into a position where they went over FFP/PSR because they were obliged to repay us - would be pretty funny (though really stupid from them
Click to expand...
And they go down amd Archers still ours & still a premiership player🤞
 
My understanding is Villa have an option rather than an obligation to buy him back if (when) we go down, same with the other lad they sold to Burnley. They may well exercise that based on his potential, but I can’t imagine they’d purposely tip themselves over FFP to do so.

If they opt not to, I’d expect other clubs to come in. Villa can’t stop us selling to another club or stop Archer choosing to go elsewhere, there is just an arrangement that if we go down we are forced to accept a bid from Villa of whatever the pre-agreed price was. If they don’t want him we can ask other clubs for more (not saying they would pay it!!)
 
They have an obligation to buy if we get relegated, that was one reason for the delay in signing him as he was sorting out the terms of his deal if he were obliged to go back.
about time legislation was introduced introduced with clear guidelines to stop this and for that matter clearly define what penalties should be imposed if clubs break rules.
 
Whilst it’s unlikely if Wilder stays here etc the obligation is only to buy back, who knows after that, still a scenario where he likes it that much he might still end up here, even if very unlikely
 
Chezzy Blades said:
My understanding is Villa have an option rather than an obligation to buy him back if (when) we go down, same with the other lad they sold to Burnley. They may well exercise that based on his potential, but I can’t imagine they’d purposely tip themselves over FFP to do so.

If they opt not to, I’d expect other clubs to come in. Villa can’t stop us selling to another club or stop Archer choosing to go elsewhere, there is just an arrangement that if we go down we are forced to accept a bid from Villa of whatever the pre-agreed price was. If they don’t want him we can ask other clubs for more (not saying they would pay it!!)
Click to expand...
This is what I understood it to be
 
Chezzy Blades said:
My understanding is Villa have an option rather than an obligation to buy him back if (when) we go down, same with the other lad they sold to Burnley. They may well exercise that based on his potential, but I can’t imagine they’d purposely tip themselves over FFP to do so.

If they opt not to, I’d expect other clubs to come in. Villa can’t stop us selling to another club or stop Archer choosing to go elsewhere, there is just an arrangement that if we go down we are forced to accept a bid from Villa of whatever the pre-agreed price was. If they don’t want him we can ask other clubs for more (not saying they would pay it!!)
Click to expand...
There’s zero option. It’s a mandatory buy back. They’ve already agreed a new contract should/when he go back, the deal took longer as it needed approval from the EPL.
 
Danetheblade said:
There’s zero option. It’s a mandatory buy back. They’ve already agreed a new contract should/when he go back, the deal took longer as it needed approval from the EPL.
Click to expand...
What a bizarre deal, it amazes me the new ways teams come up with the bend rules and find loopholes. Makes a mockery of the loan rules between PL clubs really doesn’t it?
 
Chezzy Blades said:
My understanding is Villa have an option rather than an obligation to buy him back if (when) we go down, same with the other lad they sold to Burnley. They may well exercise that based on his potential, but I can’t imagine they’d purposely tip themselves over FFP to do so.

If they opt not to, I’d expect other clubs to come in. Villa can’t stop us selling to another club or stop Archer choosing to go elsewhere, there is just an arrangement that if we go down we are forced to accept a bid from Villa of whatever the pre-agreed price was. If they don’t want him we can ask other clubs for more (not saying they would pay it!!)
Click to expand...

its obligation, not option
 
Chezzy Blades said:
What a bizarre deal, it amazes me the new ways teams come up with the bend rules and find loopholes. Makes a mockery of the loan rules between PL clubs really doesn’t it?
Click to expand...
Can't see the big whooo arrrrrh regarding Archer,done next to nowt during his time here ,yet Jimmy Ramble is walking round with a perminate hard on about him,One has shown much more potential ,when he goes back to Villa no big loss
 
Nicesheffielder said:
Can't see the big whooo arrrrrh regarding Archer,done next to nowt during his time here ,yet Jimmy Ramble is walking round with a perminate hard on about him,One has shown much more potential ,when he goes back to Villa no big loss
Click to expand...

Indeed this, he's been distinctly underwhelming and for me shouldn't even be starting at this point
 
Nicesheffielder said:
Can't see the big whooo arrrrrh regarding Archer,done next to nowt during his time here ,yet Jimmy Ramble is walking round with a perminate hard on about him,One has shown much more potential ,when he goes back to Villa no big loss
Click to expand...

He also was raving how Luke Thomas would be a very good signing for us when he first joined :rolleyes:
 
Nicesheffielder said:
Can't see the big whooo arrrrrh regarding Archer,done next to nowt during his time here ,yet Jimmy Ramble is walking round with a perminate hard on about him,One has shown much more potential ,when he goes back to Villa no big loss
Click to expand...
Agreed, in a way it protects us from another potential Brewster situation. Try before you (actually) buy and all that.
 
Frank the tank said:
He's not very Good though is he?
His pressing is lundstram esque
He telegraphs his sole intention to get it on his right foot and shoot
He's too slow
Not strong enough
Lazy
Greedy
No left foot
Takes too many touches
Apart from that gerrim signed
Click to expand...
Not a fan of his ?
 

You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Archer buyback fee
5 6 7
Replies
190
Views
25K
Kozzy_is_my_Dad
Kozzy_is_my_Dad
mattbianco1
Player Suggestion EFL Targets for 2025/26
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
ancientblade
A
LudlamBlade
Player Suggestion Harry Darling
10 11 12
Replies
354
Views
55K
Updemblades
Updemblades
Nicolaus_Copernicus
Player Suggestion Vanja Vlahovic
Replies
6
Views
2K
DifferentClass
DifferentClass
MayorOJC
Players From The Relegated 3
Replies
12
Views
2K
finlaytheblade
F

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom