Tommy Doyle

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


jono_t2000 said:
Because the price City wanted was much much higher than the discounted price that Wolves were given.
Click to expand...
Aye
So,
Even if wanted to return we couldn’t afford him.
&/or: He was so keen to come to us he wouldn’t forego a (likely) lower salary than @ Wolves & wasn’t prepared to ‘risk’ that reducing even further if we were to be relegated.
Wonder if he’s (equally) keen to commit to WW come season’s end?
Or, might he (again) have better options (than them, & us) ?
 
Ndiayewillalwaysloveyou said:
Because we needed to afford Stevens, Fleck, Osborn and Sharps wages. Luckily didn't keep two of em.
Click to expand...
Aye
Those (2) salaries banjaxed the deal - May as well chuck in the cost of Traore Slimane et al
Or
He wasn’t as ‘committed’ to returning as is being suggested - not a criticism of the player - he needs to do what is best for his future (bank career (& bank balance)
 
I felt having McAtee back without Doyle was like having Morecambe without Wise, Clough without Taylor and fish without chips. Yes, all very good…but not the full package.
 
Another fantastic strike from Tommy. All been discussed before, now full time Wolves player,can we move on, well documented as to why he wouldn't sign for us.
 
Not sure why BBC Sport have stated he's on loan from City, read a few other match reports also saying the same.
Screenshot_20240106_102842_BBC Sport.jpg
 
I thought he was on loan, but Wolves have the option to buy him for an agreed fee, much lower than we were quoted as City wanted Nunes. Just a vague memory, not an informed view.
 
mattbianco1 said:
It's a loan to buy. But as part of the Nunes deal they said the buy part can be about 4-5m

They'd be stupid not to take them up on it
Click to expand...
They were stupid to sell MGW to a team swimming in the same water.
 

Guardian, just now:

Wolverhampton Wanderers: A bit of transfer news: Wolves have triggered the option to make the signing of Tommy Doyle from Manchester City a permanent one, for a fee of about £4.3m. The 22-year-old midfielder has impressed since joining on a season’s loan last summer, making 30 appearances. City have inserted a buy-back option and significant sell-on clause in the deal. Doyle is ineligible to face his parent club at the Etihad Stadium on Saturday.
 
jim2007 said:
Guardian, just now:

Wolverhampton Wanderers: A bit of transfer news: Wolves have triggered the option to make the signing of Tommy Doyle from Manchester City a permanent one, for a fee of about £4.3m. The 22-year-old midfielder has impressed since joining on a season’s loan last summer, making 30 appearances. City have inserted a buy-back option and significant sell-on clause in the deal. Doyle is ineligible to face his parent club at the Etihad Stadium on Saturday.
Click to expand...
Hope Farry Samuels is watching
 
Klaatu Barada Nikto said:
I would guess that technically he's still on loan.
Click to expand...
Correct. Not only are we outside the registration window but there's this line in the report: "Doyle is ineligible to face his parent club at the Etihad Stadium on Saturday." Can't do that with permanents, it's what Samuel attempts to smear United about with the Kabba to Watford deal.

The transfer will go through officially on 1/7/24 when the summer transfer window opens.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

iBlade.
Garth Crooks team of the week
2 3
Replies
65
Views
10K
Bladezz
B
Deadbat
Wolves 1 United 0 - report
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
diplomat
diplomat
B
Basham interview
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
metalblade
metalblade
Northyorksblade
Paddy Buckley
Replies
26
Views
2K
Brynner
Brynner
Tony Currie
What VAR does for SUFC
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
SouthStandGBlock
SouthStandGBlock

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom