PaddysMad
Active Member
Having watched Villa get battered he’ll want to come to the team higher in the league.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I think the Liverpool/Brewster deal was - we paid them £20m and then no earlier than after 3 seasons they could buy him back for £40myeah depends if the clause is like something they can trigger anytime (so we want to keep they want to buy him back) or its a guaranteed price for them if we do decide to sell
That's all well and good but what about a sell back clause so if they're shit (Brewster ) you can sell them back at the same percentage decrease in price as the increase applied to the buybackIt's not a loan as we have bought him and can sell him.
It's just that if we do (and it depends on wording of clause) Villa have first dibs if Archer is succesful, so we'll stiĺ make profit on him whilst he's been good for us on the pitch
"Buy-back clauses in transfer agreements are used primarily to give a selling club the security of being able to repurchase a promising player at a set fee should the player excel in the future."
Xavi Simons this summer is a recent oneI know buy backs are kinda new but have they ever actually been triggered? It's not just a case of, in this example, of villa rating him and wanting him back. If another club also want him and pay a set amount he's well within his rights to go. Of course villa might be not in need of a striker or have the funds when a massive bid comes in etc so I am not really sure what the fear from our side would be unless it was a tiny amount of money
City did it with Angelino and then sold home again for a profitI know buy backs are kinda new but have they ever actually been triggered? It's not just a case of, in this example, of villa rating him and wanting him back. If another club also want him and pay a set amount he's well within his rights to go. Of course villa might be not in need of a striker or have the funds when a massive bid comes in etc so I am not really sure what the fear from our side would be unless it was a tiny amount of money
They’ve accepted €15m including add onsWhat do they want?
This happening then?They’ve accepted €15m including add ons
Expect that to be a done deal before end of month.I think the Liverpool/Brewster deal was - we paid them £20m and then no earlier than after 3 seasons they could buy him back for £40m
So signing him on Monday then, ready for FridayThey’ve accepted €15m including add ons
They’ve accepted €15m including add ons
I think he meant they’ve accepted Lens offer of €15m not £15m from us£15m including add ons, so probably something like £10m-£12m. Not too bad, maybe a little bit more than I’d like to pay but it’s what the market is
I think he meant they’ve accepted Lens offer of €15m not £15m from us
I asked what Boro want rifle said they have accepted €15m but that’s not from us.
yeah also very confusingI assumed that was a typo and we’ve had a £15m offer for Archer accepted? This is the Archer thread
They’ve accepted €15m including add ons
Same here lolI assumed that was a typo and we’ve had a £15m offer for Archer accepted? This is the Archer thread
2 playersyeah also very confusing
I was replying to a question about AkpomYeah but is this Akpom or Archer?
Are we getting cross purposes?
So no update on Archer then?I was replying to a question about Akpom
We’ve started talks with villa beyond that I don’t knowSo no update on Archer then?
I thought this was the readers wives threadWell we are on the Archer thread so I can see where wires have got crossed
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?