Brewster and McBurnie Charged

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?


Have I missed a bit, I thought he “allegedly” stamped on his leg. Sun says his head…
.View attachment 149326
The key words are “court hears”. Because they did hear it, that’s what the dog Nonce and the CPS said he’d done. The judge has since decided it was bollocks but the headline is, essentially true, even if slightly misleading.
 
The key words are “court hears”. Because they did hear it, that’s what the dog Nonce and the CPS said he’d done. The judge has since decided it was bollocks but the headline is, essentially true, even if slightly misleading.
Seird as his story when he first complained was hed had his legs stamped on twice .

No mention of head other than...

Its sensitive 🤣
 
The inconsistency of football match incidents and how they get dealt with, frustrates me.

About 15 years ago my wife got punched in the face by a male Villa fan with no justification or provocation. She needed hospital treatment.

Whilst banged up for the night he declared remorse and how out of character it was, drink involved blah blah

Then went to magistrates Court pleading not guilty and hadn't done it. Until witnesses turned up and changed his plea to guilty.

About £300 fine and nothing else. Not even a banning order.
Jesus thats fucking horrific
Hope the missus has recovered ,must have been traumatic for you both
 
“Sheffield United is pleased to note today's verdict at Nottingham Magistrates' Court with regards to Oliver McBurnie.

Oliver, his legal representatives and officials at the club are disappointed that he was forced to stand trial after the traumatic scenes at Nottingham Forest's City Ground on Tuesday 17th May 2022, when Oliver's team-mate, Billy Sharp, was violently assaulted.”

 
Regarding the "abusive Instagram message wishing death on Mr McBurnie and his family." - not sure if that constitutes a crime or not but it's a pretty threatening and hate style post, wonder if charges could/should now be pressed for that?
 
Regarding the "abusive Instagram message wishing death on Mr McBurnie and his family." - not sure if that constitutes a crime or not but it's a pretty threatening and hate style post, wonder if charges could/should now be pressed for that?

I think that McBurnie probably just wants to put all of this behind him now and crack on with his football, sure he's had enough of lawyers, court appearances, being in the public eye etc.
 

CPS and the whining forest gimp should now be sentenced for wasting courts time
I did jury service in a case a few years ago. The accused was clearly (by his own admission) a nasty, criminal piece of work.

At the end of the case, there was a huge gaping hole in the prosecution evidence and we asked for clarification from our room, to the judge, as to whether it had been overlooked or didn’t exist. When he called us back into court to tell us, it was very clear from his words and his tone that he was as baffled as we were that this vital piece of evidence didn’t exist.

It was as close as he could get to saying sorry for wasting everybody’s time, we had to return a not guilty verdict, but it made us all wonder why the CPS agreed to prosecute.
 
Regarding the "abusive Instagram message wishing death on Mr McBurnie and his family." - not sure if that constitutes a crime or not but it's a pretty threatening and hate style post, wonder if charges could/should now be pressed for that?
I've mentioned 'malicious communications' (I've heard that term elsewhere). If McBurnie wanted to I'm sure he could push for it. Same as sending that 5 letter word that was starred out.
 
Said it when the original video was posted but it's impossible to tell what actually happened (certainly beyond reasonable doubt). Really expected them to have unseen footage when it went to court. No idea how this prosecution was in the public interest.
 
I've mentioned 'malicious communications' (I've heard that term elsewhere). If McBurnie wanted to I'm sure he could push for it. Same as sending that 5 letter word that was starred out.
.

The Malicious Communications Act 1988​

An offence of Malicious Communications is committed where someone sends a letter or any other form of communication that is indecent or grossly offensive, threatening, or contains information which is false or believed to be false. In addition, the purpose for sending the message is to cause distress or anxiety.

An offence of Malicious Communications occurs once the communication is sent and does not have to be received by the intended person. It is the sending and intent of the offender which counts as an offence.

For the Prosecution to secure a conviction, it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt that a person sent to another person a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys:

  1. a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
  2. a threat; or
  3. information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
  4. any article or electronic communication which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature
If a person is found guilty of this offence, they will receive a criminal record and the Court has the power to impose a prison sentence of up to 2 years.
 
.

The Malicious Communications Act 1988​

An offence of Malicious Communications is committed where someone sends a letter or any other form of communication that is indecent or grossly offensive, threatening, or contains information which is false or believed to be false. In addition, the purpose for sending the message is to cause distress or anxiety.

An offence of Malicious Communications occurs once the communication is sent and does not have to be received by the intended person. It is the sending and intent of the offender which counts as an offence.

For the Prosecution to secure a conviction, it must be proven beyond reasonable doubt that a person sent to another person a letter, electronic communication or article of any description which conveys:

  1. a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
  2. a threat; or
  3. information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
  4. any article or electronic communication which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature
If a person is found guilty of this offence, they will receive a criminal record and the Court has the power to impose a prison sentence of up to 2 years.
I'd argue that wishing death upon someone and their family fits into that category.

I'm not saying McBurnie will chase this up, I doubt he will, but there's an argument to be had that dog nonce can have his day in court for other reasons.
 
I've mentioned 'malicious communications' (I've heard that term elsewhere). If McBurnie wanted to I'm sure he could push for it. Same as sending that 5 letter word that was starred out.

Tbf. He’s probably had numerous messages like that (not that it makes it right btw) but if footballers or any famous people for that matter reported everything they’d never be out of court.

Forever being known as the fat keith lard dog nonce lying Forest twat is probably bad enough for the lad as it is.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom