Brewster and McBurnie Charged

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

as you cant be robbing a bank & then the sue them because you broke your ankle in the process.

Actually in theory you could.....I know a business that was successfully sued by a Burglar who broke into their yard and was bitten by the owners Alsatian!
 

According to those in the S24SU knowledge data base, the wages the club pays are low enough for him to claim legal aid (it was a criminal case, your son's case would have been a civil case)
Blade56 Missed the link
 
You seem to know the judicial system so I’ll chuck the question at you but open to anyone else with knowledge.

Situation…..
My son was hit by a lorry in roadworks ont M42. Car written-off he got non life threatening injuries. Witness supported son that it was lorry drivers fault. However, his employer (large well known transport company) decided to take it to court. Just before we went in they offered him a 75/25% blame split in his favour, he said no.
No contest, even though my sons brief only got file 30 mins before hearing (was switched to Nottingham court from Chesterfield at request of transport company’s brief on the day) it was judged as lorry drivers fault 100% and legal costs of £9,800 were awarded against the transport company.

£9,800 for a few minutes work by a young solicitor!!!

As we left I asked my sons brief who would have had to pay the legal costs if my son had lost, her quick cold reply shocked mre ”he would unless he had legal protection insurance”.

Now, back to McB. I assume a barrister for all the pre trial work and 2 days in court must have cost tens of thousands based on my sons experience. So, if his legal cost were say £25,000 who has to pay it? I seem to recall there was a big debate about legal costs in Cheds case.
You’re muddling civil cases with criminal cases. I’ll let someone else fill in the details, exceptions and caveats but in basic terms

Criminal case - McB pays for his solicitor and counsel. CPS pick up the court costs. Dog Nonce pays nowt because he was the alleged “victim”. He doesn’t have his own brief as, effectively he’s a witness in a case brought by the CPS

Civil - CPS are not involved. It’s two parties arguing in court. Costs include lawyers and court costs. Basic principle is loser pays but often, it’s closer to 80/20 and the winner still has to pay some. Judge takes into account conduct of parties etc. EG if one party wants to go to arbitration or similar but the other refuses or if one party makes an offer of compensation under Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules. Basically, it can be complicated. In your lad’s case, it was a clear piss take by the truck drivers company and the judge saw straight through it. I had a similar situation with a coach company but they pulled out a day before the hearing, as I assume they got good legal advice.
 
Not been following the case at all, but does George have any repercussions?
He will forever be known for showing him self up. Doubt any numpty like him has got any sort of life, now his face is plastered all over images of hairy fuckers posing erotically with dogs. Any quick Google will pop up with this farce, that'll do for me.
 

Regardless of the outcome of this case, there was clear and obvious evidence of them failing to control their supporters.

The second time they’d failed to control a crowd at the City Ground, in a high profile game, in a matter of weeks. Remember the Leicester fan who ran onto the pitch and started twatting anyone within reach?
 
of course grateful it is not guilty. as i said at the time mcburnie has his faults we arent blind to them either. but its a ridiculous it went to court, as you cant be robbing a bank & then the sue them because you broke your ankle in the process. he shouldnt have been on the pitch on the 1st place. as football fans we know more than anyone that he is no angel because as fans we are no angels. because in my opinion he went on that pitch to provoke mcburnie because its what we saw in every match throughout that horrendous week of play off football. also i feel was heavily edited video

then i saw on bbc the bits on bbc website the cross examination showed him up for what it was. as we all know what "banter" means. just have take his word he had bruising. then had completely forgotten to say the 3 horrible messages he sent after full time. which appartantly was sent with zero malice


View attachment 149348
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
View attachment 149349
He's from Lincs? On to LCC now to revoke his citizenship and send the twat into exile.
 
The dog refused to talk.

Lord only knows what ordeal he went through! Lost a few dog lives I'll tell you!

🤣
Sorry the dog when called to comment to the press, and I exclusively quote,
"I think it's ruff justice, very ruff, now I need to go and stand on his shins again........ gobble"
 
Great news, and good to get this cloud lifted thats been hanging over him, now get him back in the tea, and scoring.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom