Errea....new kit supplier?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Thoughts on the kit?


  • Total voters
    641

This kit has really confused me. On the one hand I love it. Has all the elements I really like. Simple, clean, just enough black on too. So yeah, really love it, however, also feels like I wouldn't be suprised to see it at an amateur game because it is so simple.

So, in summary, I love-hate it and will be buying it (some day).

As an aside, having ultimate champions sponsoring on the shirt feels like a massive own goal waiting to happen.
 
Hemmingham says that the delays are due to covid delays and the late placing of the order. Club fuck up then.

 
‘Bespoke’ just means that it’s been designed individually and isn’t a template. It could have blue and white stripes and a pig badge on it but if it’s not templated then it’s bespoke. It doesn’t need to have Tony Currie’s pubes intertwined into the fabric to be ‘bespoke’.
Bespoke is a word people use to sound knowledgeable when they aren't.
 
Whoever the bid was from, they submitted their paper work to the EFL, we have to follow legal due process as a result
Don’t sign something that stops you from ordering a new kit then. It’s pretty simple. Put a contingency in place!

There are a lot of inconsistencies in the story though, Abdullah says that after the play off loss the takeover was effectively dead in the water, so on that day you crack on and run the business sensibly as if you’re going to continue being the owner. Presumably at that point we’d had numerous months working on the kits because apparently they were 10 months down the line when the deal was signed (per Bettis).

Still away and 3rd kit still missing.

Lots of bullshit going on.
 
Don’t sign something that stops you from ordering a new kit then. It’s pretty simple. Put a contingency in place!

There are a lot of inconsistencies in the story though, Abdullah says that after the play off loss the takeover was effectively dead in the water, so on that day you crack on and run the business sensibly as if you’re going to continue being the owner. Presumably at that point we’d had numerous months working on the kits because apparently they were 10 months down the line when the deal was signed (per Bettis).

Still away and 3rd kit still missing.

Lots of bullshit going on.
Them not being announced is different to them being missing
 

Once again, they haven’t been announced.

The home kit isn’t available to buy but that’s not “missing”
It’s missing from the shop, the place that we derive commercial value from them when we sell them.

The away and 3rd kits haven’t even got the announcement point as you keep banging on about, so it’s reasonable to assume that they won’t be available at the same time as the home shirts.
 
It’s missing from the shop, the place that we derive commercial value from them when we sell them.

The away and 3rd kits haven’t even got the announcement point as you keep banging on about, so it’s reasonable to assume that they won’t be available at the same time as the home shirts.
Yeah that’s what the release article literally says.
 
It’s missing from the shop, the place that we derive commercial value from them when we sell them.

The away and 3rd kits haven’t even got the announcement point as you keep banging on about, so it’s reasonable to assume that they won’t be available at the same time as the home shirts.
Most people develop object permanence at about 8 or 9 months old, I guess you must be a late developer, but that's okay.
 
That they haven’t been announced yet, they aren’t missing
Semantics now then, you’re clutching at straws.

They aren’t for sale and haven’t been announced, therefore they are ‘missing’ from sale and cannot bring the club any revenue until they appear. It’s really not that difficult. Use a different word if it helps you.

Better option, stick to using the word ‘shag’ in that really edgy way you use it, proper conversation seems too difficult for you.
 
Semantics now then, you’re clutching at straws.

They aren’t for sale and haven’t been announced, therefore they are ‘missing’ from sale and cannot bring the club any revenue until they appear. It’s really not that difficult. Use a different word if it helps you.

Better option, stick to using the word ‘shag’ in that really edgy way you use it, proper conversation seems too difficult for you.
I mean you clearly are too dim to understand why the away and third kits haven’t been announced yet but we’ll let that slide because you want something to complain about.
 
Semantics now then, you’re clutching at straws.

They aren’t for sale and haven’t been announced, therefore they are ‘missing’ from sale and cannot bring the club any revenue until they appear. It’s really not that difficult. Use a different word if it helps you.

Better option, stick to using the word ‘shag’ in that really edgy way you use it, proper conversation seems too difficult for you.

That's a rather interesting claim coming from someone who thinks this is a valid sentence;

Based on sound bites from the club. Who people are still defending like this is the behaviour of a normal with a turnover in the tens of £m’s
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom