Rodley
Well-Known Member
I'm disappointed we've gone off topic on this thread. After a false start it became very, very funny.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
I'm disappointed we've gone off topic on this thread. After a false start it became very, very funny.
I find it hard to fathom the animus some people have against him.
I think lack of likeability and managing during a period of disappointment over the premier league are the reasons. He did have a big budget, but was constantly managing it downwards. That can be spun both ways.
I agree he was a decent manager in terms of results. When they weren't going our way, his style was very difficult to stomach.
UTB
Fair enough, but of the 4 post Warnock pre Wilson managers, he was by far the best. So why does he get it in the neck more than Robson, Speed and Adams?
Blackwell was a reasonable manager for us. His record shows that. Since we were relegated from the PL in 1994, his record is better than that of Bassett, Thompson, Bruce, Heath, Robson, Speed and Adams and similar to that of Kendall and Spackman. Only Warnock did better in the sense that he got us promoted (though it took him over 6 years to do that, whilst Blackwell only had 2 years).
I find it hard to fathom the animus some people have against him.
Mic pointed out that anybody could achieve success with the players and money he had at his disposal. As already stated, Robson totally failed with the same, therefore Blackwell was far more successful than the previous manager. Had Robson stayed I have no doubt we would have been relegated, Blackwell turned that round and then the next season got us to the play-off final.
What Darren says. The bile and vitriol that people like you throw at the guy is to a large extent undeserved. Ive seen better managers at the Lane than Blackwell, but Ive also seen worse.
Come on Darren. You are smart enough to know that there is much more to it than that. Spackman had a team of similar talent to one that Blackwell took over, but Warnock, Basset and Kendall did just as well (or better) if much inferior squads. Speed and Adams (though he was spectacularly) awful had very little to work with. Blackwell took over a team with a brilliant defence and got lucky that his negative hoofball worked because the defence bailed him out. The stats are completely distorted when looking at the overall picture. If you look at Blackwell's win to games ratio when he started to stamp his authority on the team (particularly when Naughton left, Naysmith was injured and Kilgallon injured and then left) his record starts to look very average.
Just because Robson was an absolute failure does not mean that Blackwell was super man. As already suggested Blackwell had a fantastic squad at his disposal and he achieved bugger all with them. That 2nd season 9when we reached the play off final) the 2nd place was there for the taking and his negative, no plan B hoofball cost us. Birmingham limped over the finish line and any competent manager would have taken United to 2nd that year. Then as he started to mould his squad we got worse and worse. His negative hoofball stopped working when the back four was ripped apart, yet he still persisted serving up crap negative hoof sessions, in which we got convincingly beat rather than undeservedly nicking the game.
I merley state was he was. A semi pro ex goalkeeper with no tactical nousse, no plan B, a terrible man manager, negative hoofball merchant. Come on Walthy, you know I only deal in 'FACTS'![]()
Fair enough, but of the 4 post Warnock pre Wilson managers, he was by far the best. So why does he get it in the neck more than Robson, Speed and Adams?
Fair enough, but of the 4 post Warnock pre Wilson managers, he was by far the best. So why does he get it in the neck more than Robson, Speed and Adams?
Just because Robson was an absolute failure does not mean that Blackwell was super man.
Ecco Blade has it absolutely spot-on. We want to be entertained.
We want a manager who takes a team to the most important game in the football calendar with a view to winning it, not shamefully playing for a penalty lottery.
The former semi-pro, non-league, reserve goalie
You also want a team that wins.
---------- Post added at 12:39 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:39 PM ----------
Of course. History conclusively shows that the best football teams tend to win more than they lose.
Only at S2 do some Neanderthals see a conflict.
Er, has anyone on here said Blackwell was? No. Theyve simply pointed out that he wasnt deserving of the bile and vitriol you and other throw at him. Its actually a very moderate, sensible position.
Of course. History conclusively shows that the best football teams tend to win more than they lose.
Only at S2 do some Neanderthals see a conflict.
Blackwell was completely and utterly inept.
...that brought some of the most dreary football to BDTBL (as Ecc points out well).
So much for Howard Kendall then!
How about you come back to me on the points that I have raised rather than a throw away comment.
As already suggested Blackwell had a fantastic squad at his disposal and he achieved bugger all with them.
Kendall played to win that game. Andy Walker was on the bench and was just about to come on for extra time. I am convinced he would have scored had Hopkin not. Kendall was unlucky that Hopkin hit a wonder strike. Everything just wnet wrong on the day for Kendall (Katchouro knackered, Hutchinson stretchered off after 10 mins) and although Blackwell had injuries to put up with, we never even tried to win that game.
Ollie, who persuaded him to stay on?
How about you come back to me on the points that I have raised rather than a throw away comment. Blackwell was completely and utterly inept. A truly shocking manager that brought some of the most dreary football to BDTBL (as Ecc points out well). I love the way that Rusty sums it up: 'the twat factor'. This undoubtably contributed towards people like mines and Micalijo's position on him. Not only did we have to put up with negative, horrendous football, no plan B and general tactical ineptness, we had to listen to Blackwell blame other people for it. It was the fault of injuries, the grass, the groundsman, the players, the fans and la de da but NEVER himself.
As for Darren's comment. I think I give ale house Micky a pretty hard time too! See my 'worst manager in the history of SUFC' thread. A pub team manager that looked like a little child that that had just shit himself and was coming to tell his parents. I don't have anything against Speed, as he tried but was not good enough. He was a decent bloke and was honest. He came in, thinking he could change things, realised he was in over his heads and jumped ship. Not something I would do personally and I felt a bit less of him. But I thought it was the best move for SUFC for him to go when he did and hence don't resent him. I did not see much of United under Robson (I was living in Dublin at the time) and he was only in charge for a short amount of time. I don't like what he did, but I blame McCabe more for appointing him. When I look at the player Robson was and the pathetic shambles of an alcoholic he is now I actually pity him more than I despise him.
Another factor with Blackwell was that he outstayed his welcome. He did a job and if he had left after the play off final defeat I would not have a strong an opinion as I do now. The fact that he went on doing the same old shit (but worse) and dismantled the team just made it unbearable.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?