Sale of Goods Act

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

ChipButtyBlade

ChipButtyBlade

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2014
Messages
14,488
Reaction score
13,907
Location
Bag End... Hobbiton

Sale of Goods Act summary​

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 requires all goods that are bought or sold in the UK to be:
  • as described - the good should match any sample you were shown
  • of satisfactory quality - any defect or issue should have been made clear to you when you bought the goods
  • fit for purpose - you should be able to use the good for its everyday purpose, as agreed with the seller
If your goods do not meet one or more of these criteria, the retailer is in breach of contract, which would give rise for you to claim under the Sale of Goods Act.

Do we have a case with Liverpool and Brewster.
 



Its been superseded by the Consumer Act 2015.

Still doesn't cover Klopp for robbing us blind though.

pommpey
 
ChipButtyBlade said:

Sale of Goods Act summary​

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 requires all goods that are bought or sold in the UK to be:
  • as described - the good should match any sample you were shown
  • of satisfactory quality - any defect or issue should have been made clear to you when you bought the goods
  • fit for purpose - you should be able to use the good for its everyday purpose, as agreed with the seller
If your goods do not meet one or more of these criteria, the retailer is in breach of contract, which would give rise for you to claim under the Sale of Goods Act.

Do we have a case with Liverpool and Brewster.
Click to expand...
Can we add McBurnie, Berge and Burke to our claim as well , unfortunate I think they were sold as seen , perhaps we can claim against MasterCard as I’m sure we didn’t use cash.
 
ChipButtyBlade said:

Sale of Goods Act summary​

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 requires all goods that are bought or sold in the UK to be:
  • as described - the good should match any sample you were shown
  • of satisfactory quality - any defect or issue should have been made clear to you when you bought the goods
  • fit for purpose - you should be able to use the good for its everyday purpose, as agreed with the seller
If your goods do not meet one or more of these criteria, the retailer is in breach of contract, which would give rise for you to claim under the Sale of Goods Act.

Do we have a case with Liverpool and Brewster.
Click to expand...
Don't think that post does you any favours at all to describe a human being as a commodity is not good.
It's obvious who you talk about !Can't agree at all
 
I experienced the worst customer service this morning. I don't want to mention the name of the store because I'm not sure how I'm going to proceed. Last night I bought something. I paid cash for it. I took it home and found out it didn't work. So this morning, less than 12 hours later, I took it back and asked if I could get a refund. The cashier told me NO even though I still had the receipt. I asked if I could get a replacement or a store credit instead. Again she said NO! I asked to talk to a manager as I'm really not happy, and I explained that I had just bought the item, got it home and it didn't work. The manager just smiled and told me to my face that I was out of luck!
No refund. No replacement. No store credit, nothing I am never buying another lottery ticket there again.
 
finlaytheblade said:
Don't think that post does you any favours at all to describe a human being as a commodity is not good.
It's obvious who you talk about !Can't agree at all
Click to expand...
Bloomin eck,you are a deep thinker matey,dont turn this into one of them threads,start your own. 👍

You ever heard of tongue in cheek 🤔
 
We have definitely got a case of buyers remorse: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buyer's_remorse

Before the purchase, the buyer has a full array of options, including not purchasing.

Afterwards, their options have been reduced to:

Continuing with the purchase, surrendering all alternatives
Renouncing the purchase

I think we are well into the renouncing the purchase phase
 
ChipButtyBlade said:

Sale of Goods Act summary​

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 requires all goods that are bought or sold in the UK to be:
  • as described - the good should match any sample you were shown
  • of satisfactory quality - any defect or issue should have been made clear to you when you bought the goods
  • fit for purpose - you should be able to use the good for its everyday purpose, as agreed with the seller
If your goods do not meet one or more of these criteria, the retailer is in breach of contract, which would give rise for you to claim under the Sale of Goods Act.

Do we have a case with Liverpool and Brewster.
Click to expand...
Chancers definately f*cked then....
 
Klopp played a blinder by getting 'sold as seen' put in the contract.
 



ChipButtyBlade said:

Sale of Goods Act summary​

The Sale of Goods Act 1979 requires all goods that are bought or sold in the UK to be:
  • as described - the good should match any sample you were shown
  • of satisfactory quality - any defect or issue should have been made clear to you when you bought the goods
  • fit for purpose - you should be able to use the good for its everyday purpose, as agreed with the seller
If your goods do not meet one or more of these criteria, the retailer is in breach of contract, which would give rise for you to claim under the Sale of Goods Act.

Do we have a case with Liverpool and Brewster.
Click to expand...

Signing brewster was much like buying a very nice new build house for 2 million

Then deciding to stay and live in your terraced house for £150,000 whilst still owning the brand new house

Then watching the new house deteriorate over time and just standing and watching the house rot whilst saying that house is shit

Sharp is the terraced house btw
 
FallowfieldBlade said:
Signing brewster was much like buying a very nice new build house for 2 million

Then deciding to stay and live in your terraced house for £150,000 whilst still owning the brand new house

Then watching the new house deteriorate over time and just standing and watching the house rot whilst saying that house is shit

Sharp is the terraced house btw
Click to expand...


Worst Haiku ever......
 
FallowfieldBlade said:
Signing brewster was much like buying a very nice new build house for 2 million

Then deciding to stay and live in your terraced house for £150,000 whilst still owning the brand new house

Then watching the new house deteriorate over time and just standing and watching the house rot whilst saying that house is shit

Sharp is the terraced house btw
Click to expand...

As much as admire Brewster and Sharp I'm not sure I want to live inside either of them.
 
I might buy a decent car, but if I don’t know how to drive it to its maximum, it’s not the cars fault.
 
finlaytheblade said:
Don't think that post does you any favours at all to describe a human being as a commodity is not good.
It's obvious who you talk about !Can't agree at all
Click to expand...
Whatever you do, don't read any newspaper, listen to a radio, or go on the internet while the transfer window is open :rolleyes:
 
There's also a get out clause if the tool has been abused, is not used properly or has been used to do the wrong job, that says you can get fucked.

I think that's the terminology used
 
When you discover that your brand new car has an air-cooled 500 cc two stroke engine, and the salesman had assured you that it was a 4.2 litre supercharged V8
 



You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
For Sale
Replies
16
Views
2K
Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
Moan? Nope-I saw Longhorn
Fjortoft's Aeroplane
  • Poll Poll
COH - Boycott time yet?
2 3 4
Replies
101
Views
7K
Gin&Juice
Gin&Juice
G
Early warning for the Oxford match....
Replies
8
Views
1K
FredZeppelin
FredZeppelin
5
I'm not angry ....
2
Replies
58
Views
4K
jt64
jt64
Maurice Maurice
Not sure...
Replies
2
Views
905
ZLB
ZLB

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom