Everybody should be allowed to put their suggestions forward. But I'd be more interested if the ones suggesting for example extremely more attacking line ups contained a few thoughts on how they thought we'd be able to cope defensively.
Last season at Anfield I thought we'd have a 1 in 100 chance of a result. This time it's a better time to play them. Maybe 1 in 10 chance of a result. They've just played Ajax, they've got a few injuries, they're playing Champions League again a few days after us and they've shown they can be vulnerable defensively. On the other hand they managed to beat Ajax with a rotated team and took off their front trio after 60 minutes. And we're not quite as good.
This was my suggestion:
View attachment 95718
As Jake Robinson was today's player to do the pre match interview I reckon he'll be starting with Enda going to LWB. Not a big change, I don't think our centre halves will bomb forward a lot anyway.
I can also see Wilder picking McGoldrick to start rather than Burke, he'll hold the ball up better, wait for more of our players coming forward into position, probably take some pressure of the defence, which will be needed. Maybe that is what we'll need. There was also a piece in the Star on our "midfield being brilliant without Fleck", suggesting Norwood will keep his place? Again there are postives if that's what we'll go with. Norwood is a good playmaker and will make himself available at all times.
I still think the combination of McGoldrick and Norwood is something that I'd sacrifice. I think Liverpool will have at least 70% possession. We'll need to cope with that. Ampadu at DCM would be interesting. I think he's the best we've got when it comes to protecting the defence. Alongside Lunny (possibly Osborn) and Berge we'd have an athletic and fit trio who are good defensively, but who can also offer quite a bit in possession. I liked Barkley's performance for Villa against Liverpool. Powerful lad, making strong runs from central behind Liverpool's midfield. Why don't we try Burke in such a role, rather than having McGoldrick slowing things down, or McBurnie hanging around up front unemployed with Brewster, with us not getting the ball to them. I don't think they'll enjoy chasing after Burke, Berge and Lundstram if we can get a few decent breaks.