Adding these two players where would we finish

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




Woody was a winger - No place in 352 !

As for TC he'd have to compete for the Norwood/Berge position - forum would be in meltdown 😉

Having seen them both extensively there's no doubt they would make a difference. Their ability on the ball was exceptional and Woodys deadball hitting was probably bettered by no one in that era.

Some of the pitches in those days were disgraceful - Currie and Woody would be magnificent players on the desso.

UTB
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )
Have you reported your dad to Childline?
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )

TC & Woody were magnificent players, they really were, but TC was a special talent criminally under used by England. He had everything, a good change of pace, good in the air, strong on the ball & in the tackle, terrific shot in either foot, all the ball skills you would ever need, & the confidence to take any game by the scuff of the neck & dominate it. In terms of style & ability think Glen Hoddle, but he was more dynamic, much stronger & more physical in general, I know I have Blades tinted glasses but second only to George Best in my opinion, & that is because he didn't have quite the stage to showcase himself that Best had.
 
Take it you disagree?!
I saw Currie (who was very, very good) but never Hagan, so can't comment on him - but would be surprised if he was better than TC.
The abuse was bringing Philliskirk into the equation as sarcasm can also damage a child's development ;)
 
I will add to my comments above by saying that I believe TC had dodgy knees, one worse than the other, & often did little training during the week so he could play. It didn't seem to hinder him though, & it didn't stop Man Utd wanting him or signing for Leeds.
 
Bottom 5, I mean, theyre 60+yr old blokes.
 



TC & Woody were magnificent players, they really were, but TC was a special talent criminally under used by England. He had everything, a good change of pace, good in the air, strong on the ball & in the tackle, terrific shot in either foot, all the ball skills you would ever need, & the confidence to take any game by the scuff of the neck & dominate it. In terms of style & ability think Glen Hoddle, but he was more dynamic, much stronger & more physical in general, I know I have Blades tinted glasses but second only to George Best in my opinion, & that is because he didn't have quite the stage to showcase himself that Best had.

An excellent summary of a truly great player .
 
Yes excellent summary and there was no mention there of his tremendous passing skills. Anyone who saw him could not forget how he could turn and hit 40 yard passes directly to the feet of Woody as he ran down the wing. Truly amazing ability. What a player. And what a player Woody was too. And we were truly blessed to see those two in the same team together for a while.
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )

Never saw Hagan and just missed out on Joe Shaw but have been told by other old fans of other clubs that Shaw was a Rolls Royce of a player.

As for TC - in an era of cloggers, TC stood out with a few other players of skill and considering some of the awful pitches that were around at the time he fitted into a side that oozed quality. We all marvel at Norwood pinging it about, TC did it on poor pitches and often without thinking - just a quick look or instinct.

We wouldn't be able to afford him these days but there was a reason we played this song................



UTB
 
Never saw Hagan and just missed out on Joe Shaw but have been told by other old fans of other clubs that Shaw was a Rolls Royce of a player.

As for TC - in an era of cloggers, TC stood out with a few other players of skill and considering some of the awful pitches that were around at the time he fitted into a side that oozed quality. We all marvel at Norwood pinging it about, TC did it on poor pitches and often without thinking - just a quick look or instinct.

We wouldn't be able to afford him these days but there was a reason we played this song................



UTB


Brought a tear to my eye did that and it wasn't just the costumes . :)
 
Brought a tear to my eye did that and it wasn't just the costumes . :)

As one example, I worked in Leeds for a number of years with a Middlesbrough fan who had lived a lot of his adult life in Doncaster working in H&S at British Coal. His dad used to take him all over the place watching games and his dad waxed lyrical about this footballer called "Joe Shaw". Therefore his dad took him to see........Joe Shaw play..........and that's where I heard the phrase "Rolls Royce". I used to like talking to the "oldies" about football when it was a completely different era to when I started in 1967. There appears to have been much more respect for other teams players in the early 60's

Anyway - get the hanky out again !

UTB
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )

Based on that final paragraph , I suggest that you would be well advised to take anything your old man ever told you about football with a very large pinch of salt . :)
 
Serious question for older blades about TC, (before my time) was he really that good? Who from the 80s or 90s (does not have to be a United player) would be comparable in style of player?

My old man said nobody was fit to lace the boots of Jimmy Hagan, even TC. He did say Tony Philliskirk got close though )
Seriously no one has come anywhere near TC trust me he wasn’t that good he was bloody brilliant
 
TC & Woody were magnificent players, they really were, but TC was a special talent criminally under used by England. He had everything, a good change of pace, good in the air, strong on the ball & in the tackle, terrific shot in either foot, all the ball skills you would ever need, & the confidence to take any game by the scuff of the neck & dominate it. In terms of style & ability think Glen Hoddle, but he was more dynamic, much stronger & more physical in general, I know I have Blades tinted glasses but second only to George Best in my opinion, & that is because he didn't have quite the stage to showcase himself that Best had.
agree with all that mate spot on
 
They‘d have a cracking first game, then after the whistle, in the dressing room sink a couple pints, a smoke in the stairwell, crack a few ‘ethnic’ jokes, slap the stewardess on the arse and get fired on the Sunday.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom