robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 19,237
- Reaction score
- 26,543
- Banned
- #1
In the last couple of games (which we did brilliantly to draw) we've tired badly towards the end. I can only see this getting worse as the season goes on. The forwards are normally both subbed off. Whilst I see the logic in leaving two upfront, as we had the McBurnie chance late on, I wonder if it would be better to sub on Freeman for a striker instead? If we throw some fresh legs into midfield we might do a better job of stopping the opposition attacking. Although, that would potentially result in the ball not sticking upfront.
None of our forwards seem particularity capable of lasting 90 minutes which is restricting Wilder's ability to sub tired players off.
For instance, Lundstram was shattered and gave the ball away badly several times before he came off. In a perfect world he should have been substituted earlier, but if Wilder only has one sub to play with I can see why he'd be reluctant to do so.
In a roundabout way what (I think) I'm trying to say is that we desperately need to get our strikers fitter and able to last 90 minutes to allow us to bring fresh legs on in defence and midfield to help us see games out.
None of our forwards seem particularity capable of lasting 90 minutes which is restricting Wilder's ability to sub tired players off.
For instance, Lundstram was shattered and gave the ball away badly several times before he came off. In a perfect world he should have been substituted earlier, but if Wilder only has one sub to play with I can see why he'd be reluctant to do so.
In a roundabout way what (I think) I'm trying to say is that we desperately need to get our strikers fitter and able to last 90 minutes to allow us to bring fresh legs on in defence and midfield to help us see games out.