Very good Article from Huw Davies

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?





Very good read, if that prick Mills reads it, then hopefully he'll go crawl back under a rock.

Just goes to show there are a few informed journalists out there who do the homework and appreciate the extraordinary and stylish way in which we go about things.
 
Very good read, if that prick Mills reads it, then hopefully he'll go crawl back under a rock.

Just goes to show there are a few informed journalists out there who do the homework and appreciate the extraordinary and stylish way in which we go about things.

Indeed, but unfortunately Huw probably gets paid 10 bob for his work, Mills probably was paid 1k plus for his hour special.
 
Indeed, but unfortunately Huw probably gets paid 10 bob for his work, Mills probably was paid 1k plus for his hour special.
Fair point, it's just pretty shit that there's good journo's out there and then there's absolute jokes like Danny Mills blocking any progression. It's like the toss on talkSport, with the likes of Ray Parlour and Jason Cundy. There's no original or insightful analysis, just regurgitate, rinse and repeat.
 
Good read, heard similar on talksport this morning, Trevor Sinclair claiming that we would struggle because we hadn't really spent much or brought in any signings .... eh?
 
Whilst ever the likes of Danny Mills continues to be employed and paid very handsomely by sky for talking shit and not having to actually know what he's talking about, then he will continue to do what he is doing now. He is getting away with putting sod all effort in or bothering to do his homework on subject matters where he is supposed to be an 'expert'. He is clearly a very lazy individual and treats viewers with contempt.

It is a two way street though, I also have nothing but contempt towards that fool.

Maybe it's a bit like the Samson tale from the bible, in that any sense he had or brain cells disappeared with his hair.
 
Very good read, if that prick Mills reads it, then hopefully he'll go crawl back under a rock.

Just goes to show there are a few informed journalists out there who do the homework and appreciate the extraordinary and stylish way in which we go about things.
You're assuming Danny Mills can read. The evidence he displays of his intelligence levels suggest that might not be a foregone conclusion.
 
Fair point, it's just pretty shit that there's good journo's out there and then there's absolute jokes like Danny Mills blocking any progression. It's like the toss on talkSport, with the likes of Ray Parlour and Jason Cundy. There's no original or insightful analysis, just regurgitate, rinse and repeat.

Let's not forget Gary Lineker. Allegedly being paid £1.7 million for being distinctly average.
I like Alex Scott. She knows her football (clearly does the research), speaks clearly, and looks good.
 
For all the negative and lazy articles or comments there have been just as many in depth complimentary ones .
 
You're assuming Danny Mills can read. The evidence he displays of his intelligence levels suggest that might not be a foregone conclusion.

I met Danny Mills a few years ago at a charity event. I gather he does a lot of work for a spina bifida charity. Came across as a very pleasant guy. We didn't get on to football, however.
 
Let's not forget Gary Lineker. Allegedly being paid £1.7 million for being distinctly average.
I like Alex Scott. She knows her football (clearly does the research), speaks clearly, and looks good.

Alex Scott is brilliant, always well researched and clearly passionate about the beautiful game, unlike Sue Smith. I've had the pleasure of working with Alex a few times and she is the same person on and off air.
 



Good article I'm sure there's a bus with Mills name on it whack
 
Let's not forget Gary Lineker. Allegedly being paid £1.7 million for being distinctly average.
I like Alex Scott. She knows her football (clearly does the research), speaks clearly, and looks good.

I agree, I think Alex Scott is quite good, however she has a Vagina and is black so she’s down two for two for some on here I’m afraid.
 
The ironic thing is that while I'm sure it's not what you were intending, the only person here to reduce Alex Scott down to just a black woman is you. Bravo.

Not wishing to get into it but, there have been comments on here before about how Alex Scott is only given punditry work because she's a woman, I'll try to find some.
 
I agree, I think Alex Scott is quite good, however she has a Vagina and is black so she’s down two for two for some on here I’m afraid.

Comments in shout box about Alex Scott last season.

“PC gone mad”

“Box ticking”

“Annoying voice”

“Chip on her shoulder”
 
Well it's no coincidence that BT, Sky, BBC and ITV all had female pundits from the end of last season (start of world cup).

Quite clearly there was some blueprint to get more female pundits across the board.
 
Radio 5 this morning

Robbie Savage had us down for relegation on their preview show.

As did Henry Winter..

Paul Scholes has us stopping up. (Didn’t say if he’s had a bet on it though)
 



Let's not forget Gary Lineker. Allegedly being paid £1.7 million for being distinctly average.
I like Alex Scott. She knows her football (clearly does the research), speaks clearly, and looks good.

Alex puts 90% of her male counterparts to shame. We need more people like her - men as well please ffs

...and is there only Gary Neville and Colin Murray that know what they are talking about?
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom