RMBlade
Active Member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2015
- Messages
- 1,566
- Reaction score
- 1,515
I’m not saying I agree with it, just giving a reason why they may do it. Just from the link posted in this thread alone they probably have more visits than their average article. Then there is Danny’s alternative article which will have a similar amount.That makes it worse. There's so much lazy journalism that we now see it as a defence that the writer probably knows how terrible their sources are.
Easy publicity/money for very little work. Do you think Danny’s article (how it should have been written in the first place) would have gained as much publicity if it wasn’t for the TransferMarkt article?