GallonofMagnet
Member
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2006
- Messages
- 963
- Reaction score
- 1,633
Danny Webber and Marcus Gayle.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
It was dyer ,he signed him on a free straight afterDanny Webber and Marcus Gayle.
I’ll go;
Bid rejected Monday.
Improved bid by Wednesday
Signed by Friday.
Chilling on Sunday.
I found the Coady one a little odd - almost to the point I didn’t believe him.
I’m seeing this one in a similar way.
Wrong again, unfortunately.It was dyer ,he signed him on a free straight after
He’s an ugly bastard. Good. We have too many pretty boys and bearded hunks in the squad at the moment.View attachment 41831
I'd say he's under 10% body fat there. I'd go as far as to say 8%.
Wrong again, unfortunately.
Danny Webber signed for us January ‘05.
Bruce Dyer signed for us January ‘06.
They are also looking at Tom Bradshaw tooIpswich close signging a striker (Elliott Harrison) for 1.6m - Waghorn replacement?
I think there's some hesitancy there, because at 28, he's only performed like last season just the once. Fans would generally like to see us spend the money, but are looking for a cast iron guarantee. Unfortunately in football, there aren't any.
First to say, in CW I trust. However, it's strange this football malarky. He cost Ipswich £250k (I think) A year later, they are asking for multi zillions.
Clubs usually layout these vast sums when either an up and coming young star with lots of potential, or when consistently producing the goods. Just seems odd that Waghorn has took until now to reach his potential. I hope he isn't a one hit wonder. By that I mean I believe he's a decent player regardless, but he may not repeat his one season of excellence, so £5m (or more) not so sure?
It's very rare for our beloved club to go splashing the limited funds we have, I hope we don't do a Rhodes that's all and fans are desperate for CW to get it right
Just to repeat though, in CW I trust.
It's not a criticism of either club or CW, but if we weren't that interested/had no interest in getting him last summer at £400k, why are we after him 12 months later for £5m?
My thoughts exactly.
It's not like Waghorn's changed as a player. He's just had a good season.
Rumoured to be £400k last summer and that's after he'd supposedly been touted about to a lot of clubs south of the border with little interest. At £5m, he's gone up £287,500 per goal he's scored last season. He wouldn't be a player that I'd pay more than £2m (fee + add ons) for, but then again I'm not CW and we're buying in a daft market. He's 28 and he's had 3 good seasons in 10 years. One last year in the championship, one in 15/16 in Scotland and one in 09/10 for Leicester in the championship. He's scored 93 in 314, which looks impressive on paper, but 56 of those goals were scored in those 3 seasons. It's not a criticism of either club or CW, but if we weren't that interested/had no interest in getting him last summer at £400k, why are we after him 12 months later for £5m?
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport...-news/rangers-nowhere-near-1m-martyn-10958574
Are we all trying a Craig David remake here
He’s an ugly bastard. Good. We have too many pretty boys and bearded hunks in the squad at the moment.
Uncle Bryn, is that you?
Was what?Was it Akinbye?
Was what?
Signed at the same time as Dyer. Someone was I’m sure but can’t remember who
Look at it like this (purely based on last season) he scored 16 goals. Assisted countless more in a dire Ipswich team which they've came out stated (fanbase of Ipswich) they'd be fighting relegation without him.My thoughts exactly.
It's not like Waghorn's changed as a player. He's just had a good season.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?