Would we spend £5 million on one player?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

This is the problem, the market is ridiculous and seems to get worse each season. Marriott quoted as £5M and the likes of Madine went for more than that. I think we might go that high, albeit undisclosed :rolleyes: but I think Tufty may go for Prem loans, which of course have fees and potentially high wages, rather than paying over the odds for a 'known' bigger name player.

The main problem he has is that whilst it's been relatively easy picking the right type of player thus far, as we move up the scale and try and get the more expensive 'bigger' names, this becomes harder and as others have said, has the danger of upsetting the squad as a whole.

Would we want a John Terry for example ?
 



We could do it as long as Brooks is sold which by all accounts will happen for anything between £10m to £15m
 
Can't see us parting with 5 million straight away.

But could be over a few seasons like a lot of football transfers now a days or a part ex.

Most of our budget needs to go on strikers though tbh. The rest of the squad did amazingly well but my god we missed our fair share of absolute sitters. We seem to need 10 clear chances to score where as the top 6 only needed a couple.

Really?? How many games did we fail to score Vrs how many clean sheets????

Scoring wasn't an issue. Holding on to leads was. As was clean sheets. Look at our goal difference...

We need at least x2 CBs before we even think about a striker....
 
Can't see us parting with 5 million straight away.

But could be over a few seasons like a lot of football transfers now a days or a part ex.

Most of our budget needs to go on strikers though tbh. The rest of the squad did amazingly well but my god we missed our fair share of absolute sitters. We seem to need 10 clear chances to score where as the top 6 only needed a couple.

Depends on this year's budget. Let's say come August we had a first team squad of 25 players - all on the same salary of £15,000 per week. That's £19.5m for the year. We may need a budget of £30m to buy several players at multi-million pound prices

Striker: £5m
Gk: £2.5m
LWB: £2.5m
CB: Loan
Striker: Loan

I doubt we have £30m but £20m would be close to the mark so it's unlikely but then again who knows that the owners wouldn't stump up more if asked?

Any budget probably would include the Jan Window spending as well - unless new investors are here and investment is provided for the final push?
 
Did anybody else bother to watch the video in that article? Of the last 7 league 1 top scorers only 2 have made any impact at Championship, Sharp who had already done it at that level (question was could he still do it?) And Rhodes. I know this doesn't mean players can't make the step up but the chances are they won't. Given that nugget of information I wouldn't blow more than a million (up front) on a risk like that. And maybe, just maybe the step up from league 1 to Championship is a bigger one than we gave it credit for.
 
Peterborough have reportedly set Marriott's price tag at 6.5mil.

No thanks.
 
Yes if we've got a mid table budget...The likes of Bristol City, the Pigs etc have all spent more than that. If we are going to spend it in any area it will be up front.

My guess/hope

3-5m on a strike
2-3m on Blackman
1-2m on an experienced centre half

Then a number of loanees like the Chelsea lad we've been linked with. Bed those in with what we've got and it could be another exciting season

For a side that's aiming to challenge and has a mid table budget I don't think that is at all unreasonable...unless of course it's all words and no spondoolies
 
Yes I'm being optimistic, but quality signing you have got to be looking at 2 plus million a pop these days. We need about 4 maybe more ,good signing that can come in and make a difference. So your looking at 10 plus million . I think 10 to 15 is the budget. I'm hoping so anyhow . If it's any less then the owners really do need to find another expensive hobbie.
 
All those saying we need a striker - question for you: what do we do with Brooks when we spend £5m on a quick, lively striker?

We have a £10-15m striker in our squad.

A decent CB we do not...
 
Yes if we've got a mid table budget...The likes of Bristol City, the Pigs etc have all spent more than that. If we are going to spend it in any area it will be up front.

My guess/hope

3-5m on a strike
2-3m on Blackman
1-2m on an experienced centre half

Then a number of loanees like the Chelsea lad we've been linked with. Bed those in with what we've got and it could be another exciting season

For a side that's aiming to challenge and has a mid table budget I don't think that is at all unreasonable...unless of course it's all words and no spondoolies

Whilst I have said I think the owners may have thrown £5m each to give CW a decent kitty, that would also include increases in the wage bill. At a complete guess, I would assume if CW has £10m to spend , that will include wages for these player signings

So for example £3m fee for a striker + £1m salary for the season = £4m
 



Whilst I have said I think the owners may have thrown £5m each to give CW a decent kitty, that would also include increases in the wage bill. At a complete guess, I would assume if CW has £10m to spend , that will include wages for these player signings

So for example £3m fee for a striker + £1m salary for the season = £4m
But we've off loaded Donaldson and Wilson, Carruthers will be gone and there's another 6 or so on the list. So that will clear some of the current wage bill so that offsets some of the new salaries
 
But we've off loaded Donaldson and Wilson, Carruthers will be gone and there's another 6 or so on the list. So that will clear some of the current wage bill so that offsets some of the new salaries

I agree, but as we don't know the numbers and Chris is trying to take us to the next level, higher wages for better players could still be significant and consequently make a fair old dent in the transfer budget agreed
 
Get jags back let him run the team like terry has done for villa .Very wise move getting terry pay big wages but he will be the player that's going to villa back to the prem
 
Did anybody else bother to watch the video in that article? Of the last 7 league 1 top scorers only 2 have made any impact at Championship, Sharp who had already done it at that level (question was could he still do it?) And Rhodes. I know this doesn't mean players can't make the step up but the chances are they won't. Given that nugget of information I wouldn't blow more than a million (up front) on a risk like that. And maybe, just maybe the step up from league 1 to Championship is a bigger one than we gave it credit for.

Isn't that exactly what the Wednesday fans were saying when we got promoted?
 
Can't see us spending that much for a L1 striker, if we did we'd end up selling brooks JOC or fleck to fund other reinforcements which wouldn't make a lot of sense, unless we get a brilliant offer for brooks
 
Really?? How many games did we fail to score Vrs how many clean sheets????

Scoring wasn't an issue. Holding on to leads was. As was clean sheets. Look at our goal difference...

We need at least x2 CBs before we even think about a striker....

What we really need to do is change the defensive shape and, until we do, we're always likely to ship goals in this league. We got away with it in the Losers League but forwards in this division are a different kettle of fish altogether.

As for spending 2 - 3 million on Blackman as some have suggested, the very thought makes me shudder.
 
What we really need to do is change the defensive shape and, until we do, we're always likely to ship goals in this league. We got away with it in the Losers League but forwards in this division are a different kettle of fish altogether.

As for spending 2 - 3 million on Blackman as some have suggested, the very thought makes me shudder.

Yep. Morgan's successor has been a priority for the past 10 years and still is. Once we've done that he needs a partner (JOC will do) and a full back either side of them.
 
I know knob-all about the lad, so I consulted our old friend YouTube...



Extremely difficult to tell how good he is from that. A lot of goals but only looks as good as our Billy. Suppose there's room for improvement at his age.

Anybody know how good he really is? Would he be worth the money if indeed we had it?


Looking at that I can't see why we would spend 5 mil when we have billy who scores better goals, but billy is getting older now so how long can we realistically keep him? We would essentially be buying potential as he is so young and already good.

Doesn't look like what we need to me though, we need someone strong with pace IMO, rather than a goal poacher.
 
We spent about £5m last season so I don’t think it’s out of the questions. From Wilders big interview he said he needed quality not quantity..an improved budget on £5m so £7.5m to £10m?? inc a GK a LB and a striker
Means there should be a few decent fees paid..

This was last seasons spend, transfermrkt is usually relatively accurate fully expect the usual We spent £10 on Tommy Cowan’s no chance etc etc.
 

Attachments

  • E5F6BAFC-3AA4-45AC-BB32-22594E99CAC6.jpeg
    E5F6BAFC-3AA4-45AC-BB32-22594E99CAC6.jpeg
    626.8 KB · Views: 21
We spent about £5m last season so I don’t think it’s out of the questions. From Wilders big interview he said he needed quality not quantity..an improved budget on £5m so £7.5m to £10m?? inc a GK a LB and a striker
Means there should be a few decent fees paid..

This was last seasons spend, transfermrkt is usually relatively accurate fully expect the usual We spent £10 on Tommy Cowan’s no chance etc etc.
0C09E36F-705C-4CBB-B1C5-52BC23E8CE7E.jpeg
 
Is Marriott even quick? I don't mean "quicker than Billy" i mean... fuckin rapid?

I don't want us spending that much money on a player who can't do 100 metres in 6 seconds.

If you want quick I'm sure Usain would come on a free. o_O
 



What we really need to do is change the defensive shape and, until we do, we're always likely to ship goals in this league. We got away with it in the Losers League but forwards in this division are a different kettle of fish altogether.

As for spending 2 - 3 million on Blackman as some have suggested, the very thought makes me shudder.

Very good point. I'm still none the wiser as to whether it's shape or personnel that are the issue. Instinct tells me personnel, but you might be right.

As for Blackman, it's the thought of Flippy Flappy Moore being our Number 1 that truly makes me shudder.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom