Glen Johnson/Charlie Adam

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

bigbirdblade

Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2014
Messages
657
Reaction score
834
Apparently both are being let go by Stoke. Reckon CW could be interested?
 

Its arguable if we need them anyway but they're too old but I can't see us paying their wages which are like 5-10 times more than our players are on at the moment.
 

........Is this 2009?
I........................I
Yes.................. No?
I........................I
Sign em up......No Chance
 
Indeed.

Adams would be a great shout, career in the top division, his experience would be invaluable, providing we were able to appreciate his unseen work. We could even offer him a guaranteed contract extension to sweeten the deal.

Sorry i was being sarcastic! I wasn’t going back as far as McCall etc, I was thinking sammon Hammond and do :)
 
Adams HAS been a top player , but not what we need this season, also probably earning about £30k per week
 
Adam would be a good replacement for Coutts. Get him till the summer with option of extended deal.

Last time I saw Adam playing for Stoke he looked like an oil tanker and turned like one too. He definitely wouldn’t be a good replacement for Coutts from what I saw then
 
Charlie Adam is on the Rangers FC radar.

Rangers can’t afford a radar never mind Charlie Adam.

I’d take him. He’s always looked like an unfit bus driver but he has also always been a decent attacking threat. A side like this Blades team would bring out the best in him.
 
Why are we ruling players out on age? If Adam and Johnson are too old then we should be looking to sell Sharp, Clarke and Duffy shouldn’t we?

If Adam and Johnson get paid up by Stoke then they will be on £0 per week, they can’t and won’t demand their current Stoke salaries because no one will pay it!

Having said all that, I'm sure if I would sign either, but dismissing them as old, on the way down mercenaries is daft. Plenty of older players have dropped down the leagues and turned out to be great signings.
 

Why are we ruling players out on age? If Adam and Johnson are too old then we should be looking to sell Sharp, Clarke and Duffy shouldn’t we?

If Adam and Johnson get paid up by Stoke then they will be on £0 per week, they can’t and won’t demand their current Stoke salaries because no one will pay it!

Having said all that, I'm sure if I would sign either, but dismissing them as old, on the way down mercenaries is daft. Plenty of older players have dropped down the leagues and turned out to be great signings.
Yep. The bottom line when signing someone like this is whether we can afford it or not. But after that it basically comes down to attitude and fitness.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom