My personal dislike of Neil Warnock can be directly traced back to November 2005 when he was foot-stopping over a new contract and Kevin McCabe quite rightly told him that a new contract would be discussed once the agreed aim of promotion had been achieved.
In true prima-donna fashion, he aired this dirty laundry in public before applying for the Portsmouth job after Alain Perrin got sacked. Gambling on the assumption that Sheffield United would just buckle and aquiesce to his demands. We did not, and he came crawling back.
It's worth noting that his 'beloved' United were top of the division at the time, before the whole situation coincided with a significant downturn in form due to the unrest. We conceded top spot to Reading and never regained it. In fact we stumbled over the finishing line and were actually sent up by Leeds drawing.
The rest is painful history. He took charge when we were in the 2nd tier and left us in the same position after 7 years. With only a couple of nice days out to show for it.
Again, a complete misrepresentation of what happened.
Warnock's flirtation with Portsmouth was well known at the time and there was no significant down turn in our form whatsoever.
The whole episode was at it's height just before our home game against Wednesday (3rd December). A game that we won.
From that match up until the return match at Hillsborough (which we also won) on 18th February, two and a half months later, we lost a grand total of 3 league games.
The down turn in our form came at the end of February/beginning of March when we lost 3 out of 4 games. That was a long time after the Portsmouth episode was over and was hardly a prolonged period of poor form. After the third of those defeats we did not lose another game for the rest of the season and finished nine points clear of third place. If that was stumbling over the finish line then I hope we do a lot more stumbling in this and future seasons.
We got 90 points in that season. I can only remember us bettering that on two occasions. Our 4th division season and last season. Both of which were in leagues below the level of the one Warnock achieved 90 points in.
Reading had an exceptional season, finishing with 106 points (is that the highest ever championship points total?) and lost only twice all season. The first of those losses came in their first game of the season. So they lost only 1 of their next 45 league games. I don't think any side in country could live with that sort of form, so to try and make out that we were robbed of top spot because of Warnock's antics is at best disingenuous.
Yes, he was appointed manager when we were in the second tier.
Bottom of the second tier. He left us with a side that should have got promoted with very little difficulty and our financial position was vastly stronger. The position of the club when he left bore no resemblance to the one he first came to.