Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Good signing this, looks like a commanding midfield presence. Passing, tackling and lots of energy.
Although personally bored of the whole Leonard saga now I wouldn't rule out signing him as well. We were very lucky with injuries last season, and may not be this time. We only need to lose Coutts (for example) to a long term injury and then Fleck picks up a knock leaving us a bit bare in the centre.
As said by others we could be looking at Duffy, Brooks and Carruthers as options behind the striker.
Then we have Thomas as the natural winger, with Duffy and Brooks as alternatives.
Fleck and possibly Leonard as the box to box options, with Coutts and Lundstrum as the holding / deep lying playmaker options.
Bash steps in only in the event of a deep injury crisis but otherwise stays at CB for me .
Without Leonard that's a fairly deep midfield squad, with him absolutely solid. Would like to see another out and out winger though.
Lundstram is a straight cover for either Fleck or Coutts. Leonard is completely different to those 2.
Lundstram is a straight cover for either Fleck or Coutts. Leonard is completely different to those 2.
He's far more similar a player to Coutts than Fleck.
And given Carruthers might be able to cover for Coutts as well, we also need to bring cover in for Fleck. There's currently no one without pulling Basham out of defence.
What does he offer that we do not already have?
We need a box to box midfield player who can put a foot in and a wideman with pace.
Leonard is the box to box guy, lundstram may be a good player but what does he offer that coutts, Fleck, Carruthers and Duffy do not?
If we were to get in cover for fleck, I'd rather it be a left footer so that we keep the balance we have got when fleck is there. Maybe someone like Daniel Johnson from Preston.And given Carruthers might be able to cover for Coutts as well, we also need to bring cover in for Fleck. There's currently no one without pulling Basham out of defence.
The thing is, if we sign another CB say the Lenihan guy, then I would expect the back 3 to be O'Connell, Lenihan and Stearman?
I know, that's what I said, I think Carruthers will take the Holmes role and Lundstram will take the role Carruthers did haveHomes and lundstram are totally different players lundstram is instead if leonard for sure!
As long as he runs his arse off, can break up play and put a strong tackle in I'm not bothered which of the two we sign (assuming it's one or the other)
Lundstram is someone who can get stuck in and puts his foot on the ball. I'm no expert on Lundstram but I'd say he is a slightly harder version of Coutts. People saying that why do we want Lumdstram if he's no different to what we have. Well what about if Coutts gets injured?! We need a like for like replacement. Obviously Lundstram is a lot younger and will be given time to establish himself. We can't have Fleck and Coutts with no competition. Bash is definitely more of a centre back; he can't cover the ground that Coutts and Fleck do and doesn't have the passing range either of those two. But Basham play centre back, win headers. tackles and then play a simple pass to someone more gifted, although to be fair to Basham he does carry the ball out of defence well. But Lumdstram will put his foot on the ball and play a range of passing. A taller version of McCall I hope! He was very highly rated at Everton and he seems a decent signing to me. Its also funny that Oxford fans were saying stuff like £500,000, we'll never sell for that! Piss off Wilder! Ha ha ha, Wilder wins again!
I watched the clip from when Lundstram played England under 19's and based on this he is always available for the ball and usually quickly distributes the ball, often then getting it back and then passing it again. He doesn't carry the ball, hardly at all, so he's not the sort that drops the shoulder and takes a man on but as the defensive mid, he's not likely to. Hopefully he'll get the ball off the back 4, turn and then move it forward.
Nope, none at all. They literally don't even need to be able to control the ball.No ability required then? La plus ça change...
Lundstram is someone who can get stuck in and puts his foot on the ball. I'm no expert on Lundstram but I'd say he is a slightly harder version of Coutts. People saying that why do we want Lumdstram if he's no different to what we have. Well what about if Coutts gets injured?! We need a like for like replacement. Obviously Lundstram is a lot younger and will be given time to establish himself. We can't have Fleck and Coutts with no competition. Bash is definitely more of a centre back; he can't cover the ground that Coutts and Fleck do and doesn't have the passing range either of those two. But Basham play centre back, win headers. tackles and then play a simple pass to someone more gifted, although to be fair to Basham he does carry the ball out of defence well. But Lumdstram will put his foot on the ball and play a range of passing. A taller version of McCall I hope! He was very highly rated at Everton and he seems a decent signing to me. Its also funny that Oxford fans were saying stuff like £500,000, we'll never sell for that! Piss off Wilder! Ha ha ha, Wilder wins again!
I watched the clip from when Lundstram played England under 19's and based on this he is always available for the ball and usually quickly distributes the ball, often then getting it back and then passing it again. He doesn't carry the ball, hardly at all, so he's not the sort that drops the shoulder and takes a man on but as the defensive mid, he's not likely to. Hopefully he'll get the ball off the back 4, turn and then move it forward.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?