Barney
Well-Known Member
Where did I do that in that post?The part where you differentiated between facts and opinions
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Where did I do that in that post?The part where you differentiated between facts and opinions
Where did I do that in that post?
think we need an adjudicator for all this point scoring that's going on.
Of course we don't know. We don't know if opinions are facts or not, that's why they are opinions.That's the point. Just like it could be a fact that CW sent McNulty out on loan because of his work rate. But we don't know if that's the case so why express it as fact?"As far as I can tell"
Don't you know?
Fucking love that avatar , HG , v the pigs if the joy on everybody's face is to be remembered .
think we need an adjudicator for all this point scoring that's going on.
Didn`t he (McNulty) also get his jaw broken in a bar brawl when visiting Scotland.........just saying like.
Oh fuck no. Not the jumper thing. I'm no Gok Wan, but that just makes a dude look like a bellend
Just keeping him match fit til January when he's included in the swap deal for ChedFirst, can I say I come in peace- I'm a Spireite and I'm not a 'other team hating' douche. I like the rivalry but not the hate. Anyway..
I can't understand how a player like McNulty has been allowed to go on loan to a rival team.
On loan at Pompy, he looked good and scored some goals.
He comes back, and when your needing a goal scorer, shipped out on loan to a big rival.
I would have had him at town TBH but is there something I'm not seeing?
Can he not cut it at the Blades? Is the player's attitude all wrong and that's why he's be loaned out again? Honestly, it's probably the one transfer window movement I found odd
He wears jumpers over his shoulders the level 10 bastard
Good question my spireitey chum.
To be honest, we have an embarrassment of riches, too many trying to do the same job and we've let some of the most promising ones go: Adams, DCL, McNulty. I can only imagine that we're invested in those players whose time is now: Clarke, Sharp, Done - all around 30yo and I can only hope we see McNulty as one for the future, when the above are a bit more past it. McNulty and Lavery worked well at Pompey last year, hopefully our board have the sense to see that as a long term partnership and don't flog Sparky.
Move to Bradford is a strange one but could prove whether he can cut regular football at this level, as we've never given him a chance!
Although, despite any of our riches up front, I'd swap anyone of them in an instant for your number 9.
and eventually pompeys , sidelined him ,,,, why
The majority of people posting on this thread appear to think he's shit so it would surely be a bonus if he were to play against us? I'm not sure why people get so worked up about McNulty - he's very capable at this level from what I've seen and scores goals - not sure what the instructions are that he's not following? If our strikers that have played since his absense have been following orders then look where that has got us! I hope he does well at Bradford, if he does you have to question his management rather than his abilityHe's flattered to deceive on more than one occasion for us. He would come of the bench score a goal, then start the following week and be totally anonymous and get subbed.
For me he's a 4th division or Scottish football player at best.
I have no problem with loaning him out to Bradford. He will get a chance to prove me wrong, and if he bangs the goals in for Bradford I believe we can recall him in January. He's getting game time and we get to see if he can hack it in this division,
It's a win win win situation for me.
Providing he is not allowed to play against us during the loan that is. There's something to get fatty samuals reaching for his pen.
Sharp ,Clarke Done, Lavery ,that's why hes gone on loan.
Good question my spireitey chum.
To be honest, we have an embarrassment of riches, too many trying to do the same job and we've let some of the most promising ones go: Adams, DCL, McNulty. I can only imagine that we're invested in those players whose time is now: Clarke, Sharp, Done - all around 30yo and I can only hope we see McNulty as one for the future, when the above are a bit more past it. McNulty and Lavery worked well at Pompey last year, hopefully our board have the sense to see that as a long term partnership and don't flog Sparky.
Move to Bradford is a strange one but could prove whether he can cut regular football at this level, as we've never given him a chance!
Although, despite any of our riches up front, I'd swap anyone of them in an instant for your number 9.
Exactly, Chris Wilder explained this. McNuts wanted to be playing, couldn't be guaranteed that at the moment, so shipped out on loan, best for everybody all round, and to be fair, Mark does deserve to be in somebodies starting line up at present.
They are less than impressed with a player who has started one match?Spoke to some Bratfud fans yesterday. McNulty did sweet FA for an hour v Bolton and was subbed. They are less than impressed with him. He's playing for a decent outfit in front of big crowds for a team playing well but with a dearth of strikers.... A great opportunity for a striker to make an impression you would think? Maybe the rumours about attitude are both true and insurmountable for the lad. Shame as he's a natural finisher but as was once pinned on our dressing room wall, hard work beats talent if talent doesn't work hard.
Might not be scoring on the pitch, but at least he's manged it off it.McNulty has today announced on Twitter that he's gonna be a Dad, would this be the reality check he needs to knuckle down, ditch the night outs and work hard on the training ground?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?