Basham has achieved hero status with some fans because he has stood out for the effort he puts in when playing amongst a pile of lazy or injury-carrying dross.
He is hard to dislike - a nice chap who is tall , which we perceive as an advantage - but does he use his physique ?
To me , Basham is a "nearly-man" , who could do so much better.
He is definitely NOT an adventurous creative midfielder , he's NEVER going to run with the ball , or split a defence with a pass , or shoot & score , or have a sudden moment of invention and set a an attack going in an unexpected way. There is just nothing in him which frightens other teams when he's in possession.
In defensive mode he is reasonably capable , but can make mistakes and get done for pace. He's not an assertive tackler who "puts himself about". In fact , in midfield I can't really say what he is.
With CW saying that his m/f men need both aspects to their game (they can't be just an offensive or defensive midfielder) , I cannot see CW playing him in m/f , IF he signs his m/f targets this summer.
To me , Basham has been kept as "insurance" , in case CW falls short of signing his desired m/f (OR C/B).
Basham is not a first team player in a top 2 side.
As short arses , Scougall & Reed would need to be a lot "tougher" to make an impact in League 1 football.
Off the top of my head , Dave Mackay , Billy Bremner , Peter Reid , David Batty , Gordan Cowans , Stuart McCall all demonstrate that a small midfielder can be effective with sufficient talent & toughness.
Scougall & Reed haven't convinced me yet .............. but CW is giving them a bit more time to up their game , whilst he is under budgetry constraint.
However , if CW can get Hammond & Woolford off the wage-bill , they will be toast.