Bell4
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 4, 2016
- Messages
- 5,185
- Reaction score
- 8,836
Or have a very valid opinionImagine having some fans, who never fail, at every available opportunity, to stick the proverbial boot in.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Or have a very valid opinionImagine having some fans, who never fail, at every available opportunity, to stick the proverbial boot in.
You are right that the club hasn't achieved its aims. However, the owner has signed at least 12 players and spent approximately £60m on transfers. I imagine he thought this would improve us. It hasn't. If these players had done well, I do not think you'd be critical. The blame lies with the management and the recruitment staff, who have signed inadequate players. Any owner can only trust these people to get it right. We haven't and it's that simple.Am I wrong?
It doesn’t end tomorrow and it’s barely a drop in the ocean of the cheating your club has done, you know it stinks, not only the decision but the fact they’ve made the decision straight after the Luton game, bent as fuck, everything about it stinks to high heaven.Well it does mean something. We've got 4 points less than we had this morning and if the league ended tomorrow we'd be down.
this is almost rewarding cheatingThis financial and profitable bililty is a joke. Points deduction mean nothing, especially when they can appeal.
It should be automatic relegation. They would be more quaint with their spending then. Football is becoming a joke
To which the correct response is “how does one stink out a cesspool?”Given all the comments from opposition supporters saying that we are 'stinking out the Premier League ' it would slightly amuse me if we were to somehow stay up and proceed to stink out the Premier League again next season.
The thing about the £326m spent over the past two years, is that it's amortised over the length of the contracts. So only about £40m-£50m will have hit in 2022-23, and when the current year accounts are published there will be a £70m-£80m hit, and the same again for the next couple of years. Unless they can sell some of them for more than their accounts value, they are well up the creek for a few years.this is almost rewarding cheating
23/24 £131m spent on 17 players (net spend £50m)
22/23 £195m, 29 players (£190m net)
21/22 £7m, 17 players (£6m net)
So in last 3 years they’ve seen 63 new faces, with a net spend of £327m for only 4 points
I like to take the moral high ground, but if a rich owner comes in and says yeah fuck it, huge squad overhaul, daft wages, spunkin £300+m and they want to dock me 4 measly points in 3 years time?
View attachment 180742
It is quite interesting but it doesn’t explain why they spent so much, which is because they’re a set of dirty cheating cunts.Quite interesting.
View attachment 180744
Oh boo HooQuite interesting.
View attachment 180744
Points deductions and reductions on appeal are linked not to the level of financial breaches but to the wealth of the owner and therefore the likelihood of ongoing expensive legal threats/action.Exactly this
Premier League - corrupt as fuck.
Quite interesting.
View attachment 180744
Basically the message is this - if you believe it can get you clear of relegation by 4 points - then cheat.£34m overspend - they've easily earned a win and a draw extra from that, so it was a worth it for them.
A punishment should leave you behind.
Would be happy to see them come down with us.Just you watch, Luton pull their cunt out to stay up by a 3 points, only for the fucking bent Premier League to reinstate Forests 4 points after appeal…I sincerely hope the scabs still need the points when they come to BDTBL…I will happily forget the previous 9 months if we can bring them down with us.
We had to spend £30m of that to try and keep the fans quiet having sold Ndiaye and Berge. We seemingly had no plan in place to effectively replace either. The Archer deal is also a complete farce because it’s a convoluted loan contract and as a result he’s never really been bought in from day one.You are right that the club hasn't achieved its aims. However, the owner has signed at least 12 players and spent approximately £60m on transfers. I imagine he thought this would improve us. It hasn't. If these players had done well, I do not think you'd be critical. The blame lies with the management and the recruitment staff, who have signed inadequate players. Any owner can only trust these people to get it right. We haven't and it's that simple.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?