Wolves 1 United 0 - report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

United – Despite not scoring and another loss, it was much better today. We looked like a side that could compete and we actually saw far more of the ball today. We also had chances – mainly in the first half. I thought we definitely deserved something from the game but another game where we have failed to score and for all the better play, we lacked that real attacking thrust when it mattered. Wolves only had a few chances of course but they took the one first half with a good ball and header. First half they had all the ball but actually we had the three or four decent chances with Brewster and McAtee all having opportunities. They were not sitters with only maybe the Brewster one he needs to do better (the one where he ran in). However, we remain powder puff in front of goal despite us doing better in general play. Yet, we got into the opponents half and had play in their final third. This is more than we have had most of the season. We made the home team get frustrated and gradually got on top even if we could not get level.



Second half we did really well with the ball and midfield we controlled the game for spells and we also were able to move it around better and get men up – we saw Bogle, Anel and Trusty also coming forward in general play and set plays. I thought with better decisions or if we had taken more chances in terms of those little moments in the Wolves final third, then we may have create more (we created very little 2nd half). However, Wolves sort of tried to settle for the win and ended up hanging on which was weird really as if they had kept the ball and gone at us, they surely would have got more goals? The big positives is better games from the likes of Anel and Brewster and we looked more compact and organised and not shipping away goals/chances like we have done.



It was much, much better in terms of a lot of aspects but it is all comparative when we have been getting done 5’s most weeks recently so being competitive is an improvement. We actually were well in the game and had as many, if not more chances – first half. Still we lost and not sure we tested the keeper enough or created enough that final half hour (only the one Brewster half chance second half) for all the better play. Wolves saw it out and will just take the win. For us, it will be a game where we at least saw some rays of light and hope and we did not get thumped but we might not play as well as that again all season and we have to take points/score goals when we play like that.



Ratings:



Grbic 5/10 – Did not have much to do first half really in terms of actual saves. A few routine things but then the first time we give them a proper chance, it ends up in our net. Given no protection at all. Had a few other shots that he was at full stretch for that went over but oddly, the Wolves keeper had made more saves in that first half. He was kicking long more than the short play outs, which seems a new ploy to just get us out and not take chances. Second half he flapped at a cross and then kicked one out. Did take a cross though and a good ball out to set him clear. Saved one shot at the end but kicked it straight to them. Does not look totally convincing. Not sure what he was doing on the Souza injury – he needs to boot it out – if Wolves had put it in the net, then it would have counted.



Bogle 6/10 – Started the game by losing his man a few times and not being tight enough. When he did get close he was grabbing the shirt too much. To be fair he did get out and had a few decent runs up the pitch but one pathetic dive was disappointing. Involved in setting up the chance for Brewster with a flick. He was nowhere near his man as the cross came in for the goal. Second half we saw less of him as an attacking force really. He did link a few times but the lacks the power and pace to really go past his man – at the league below he could do that. He then gave some cheap fouls away near the end to stop any momentum.



Larouci 5.5/10 – Started well with some decent defensive pieces of work where he shadowed it out and also got up the field a few times but his final ball was poor. On the goal he is asleep and needs to be aware of the man near him but just leaves him. I am not sure whether it was his designated man (Semedo would be probably?) but he was in the build up and closest to him and should see him move inside him. He either needs to talk to Robinson or go with him. He seemingly does neither and just stands there. After this he made a few decent defensive interceptions again. Second half he ballooned another cross over but then did well soon after to get back. Went off not long after. His overall performance was more like a 6.5-7 but his fault on the goal has to be taken into account.



Ahmedhodzic 7/10 – Better today in that he did some good things both defensively and attacking wise. Started with a few bits of good cover play but then a clumsy and unnecessary tackle when Neto got away. He also then started to lose his man and not get tight enough as we saw a number of free headers come in. He always seems at full stetch and seems to have lost some pace or maybe this league is just much quicker and he is struggling. He did have chances though and got forward a few times – could not sort his feet out first half and then had one blocked second half. Helped another on right at the end too.



Robinson 6/10 – Along with the rest of the defence, he started ok and some good blocks/tackles but then he was guilty of ball watching when crosses came in. Not great to see him squaring up to Souza after even if he did feel he could have done better. Some might see they are showing some spirit but it’s not a good look and Wolves will have seen that and think they had gone. Seemed to lose his head after this and lost the ball a few times or overplayed. Not even sure we created much from his throws really.



Trusty 6/10 – He was back in the team after poor form saw him lose his place and thought he was ok in the first half in that he made some blocks and won the odd challenge. Another who seems to grab the shirt but then when he balls come in from wide, he is often nowhere near his man. A few wild passes or clearances to start the second half kept Wolves in our half. However he ended the game more front foot and won his battles and also got forward and nearly got in on the chance at the end.



Souza 6/10 – Felt he was ineffective largely first half as they sort of passed through out midfield. He was neat and tidy the few times he has the ball but not sure he really made any key interceptions or tackles and then ends up getting in a bust up with Robbo. Seems frustrated with the rest of his teammates and probably regrets coming here. Second half he saw more of the ball and helped us link things as we had more possession. He was at least able to get into better areas and was involved in some of our better moves too.



Norwood 5.5/10 – Largely anonymous really first half. A few sideway passes and then some long balls to nowhere but he did not have many touches and they got through us and their midfield dribblers found space and gaps. Did get more in the game in the second half and was better with the ball as for once we actually had more possession and felt helped us control the ball.



Hamer 4/10 – Another that has to do way more. He shies away from physical contact (two 50-50’s he completely neshed) and whilst he put one good ball over the top to McAtee, he was not really on the ball anywhere near enough and the game just seems to pass him by. For one of our so called better technical players, he has to impose himself more but his fitness and lack of pace means that he struggles with players who have these attributes. Second half he at least got on the ball a bit and had one run that led to a corner and another few moments but made an absolute mess of the free kick chance on 75 minutes. Kept making poor choices and the wild shot at the end summed him up. I have been disappointed with him this season – he shows flashes but way off the standard of this level (as are most).



McAtee 5.5/10 – He had a few good runs and moments but often got crowded out of it or lost it, going down too easily. Had that one good chance but let Dawson get back and his shot was weak. Her was a threat in terms of getting on the ball and always an outlet but not sure much came off for him at all despite him keeping going and trying to get on the ball. He keeps running and always offer that channel ball but too much of the time he either does not have the help or gets muscled off it. I thought we played well today but the two main creative players, Hamer and McAtee did not really create much or look a goal threat despite having more of the ball than they have for some time.



Brewster 7.5/10 – Best we have seen him for a long time, maybe ever in the Premier League! I am not getting carried away as he still did not score and had some good chances but at least looked a threat in the sense that he had those two shots from the corner that were decent enough efforts and he nicked the ball away from the defender a few times and held it up. However, he missed a really good chance when he did get away and needed to do much better or take the pass, to his left. He did well to get away and draw a yellow card for a cynical tackle. Then won a foul with another good run. He was lively and a threat all game and played intelligently. Much better and hopefully something to build on but we have heard it all before.



Subs –



Osborn 6/10 – Decent enough as we were going forward more and helped us keep the ball as we looked the more likely.



Osula – Not sure he had many chances, he ran after a few or tried to get on the end of a few flicks.



McBurnie – As above. Flicked one on near the end but felt he came on too late.



Davies – Cannot recall him doing much but at this stage we were relying on long throws.





Manager: Wilder 6/10 – A better performance but still a loss. We never looked like getting hammered today and were not as wide open as we have been, so that is a positive and we stayed well in the game. We deserved something and had the better chances but we did not take them and they took theirs with more naïve defending costing us. We did look more solid and actually had control of the game and ball for long spells second half and our shape was much better with another changed side and playing almost the only lads we had left! I do think he should have made the changes earlier – I would have out McBurnie on alongside Brewster with 20 minutes to go. The subs were too late really to make an impact.





Wolves – They have been flying but were poor for long spells today. They showed flashes and clearly have some talented players. O’Neill has done a good job there – I thought they might struggle and do down but have been playing well as a team and picked up some impressive results. They will be comfortably mid table and nowhere near being in a relegation threat. At the Lane they were not great and today despite some good moments, they seemed to get scrappy and were poor second half. If United had got a point, they could not have argued really. The crowd became nervous and they were not able to sustain any possession really and ended up almost hanging on right to full time.





Opponent Man of the Match – A few lovely footballers but Neto stands out. Great dribbler and always able to take the ball away from opponents and get in those dangerous areas.



Opponent Weak link – I like Hwang but thought he was poor and completely ineffective today. A few of their players were not really at it and they ended up losing possession quite a bit second half.



Referee/Officials – Darren Bond. Thought a fair few of the 50-50’s went for them but at least VAR saw sense with the coming together of the two United players at each other and the Souza penalty. The rest of the yellow cards seemed pretty clear cut really. Not sure that there were many big decisions that affected the game.
Agree with almost all the comments but think all were given too many out of 10
 

A lot of teams have two centre halves and they cope well with crosses. We have three, yet on the goal, we rely on our left wing back to challenge a standard cross into the box. Why? Where were they?


View attachment 179801


I think the midfield has something to do with it. On occasions Hamer broke out of the midfield to press high up the pitch along with Brewster and McAtee. I'll assume this was him following instructions, not him being undisciplined. So when Wolves switched play over from their right to left, we only had Norwood and Souza as our midfield.


Souza can't move over to cover, meaning Norwood is pretty much on his own as Nouri cuts inside. Bogle had his man out wide, Anel had to watch Hwang. As the midfield is not back, Trusty can't stay centrally to just focus on defending a cross, he has to cover for Anel. JR is marking Lemina. Consequently we have no centre half to challenge for a back post cross.

Nowadays it is pretty easy to make a few yards for yourself against Norwood. He just doesn't have the legs to keep up with players when there is a bit of space. So Nouri is completely unchallenged as he looks up and puts in a perfect cross.
View attachment 179803

Larouci is improving, but defending crosses in the air seems to be something he's not used to doing.

In summary Wolves punish:

1) a midfield lacking numbers
2) centre halves being pulled out of position as they compensate for the struggling midfield
3) Norwood's lack of quick feet
4) Larouci's poor aerial ability/marking

Pretty much agree with all of that, Everybody blaming Larouci (rightly so) but the initial fault was letting the cross come in.
Your description of play exquisitely shows that.
I do think in few months people will be saying of Larouci, "there's a player in there" I think there is, not sure Lwb is his position, reminds me of Bogle, Rwb is not his position, they are both good going forward but neither can defend.
 
A lot of teams have two centre halves and they cope well with crosses. We have three, yet on the goal, we rely on our left wing back to challenge a standard cross into the box. Why? Where were they?


View attachment 179801


I think the midfield has something to do with it. On occasions Hamer broke out of the midfield to press high up the pitch along with Brewster and McAtee. I'll assume this was him following instructions, not him being undisciplined. So when Wolves switched play over from their right to left, we only had Norwood and Souza as our midfield.


Souza can't move over to cover, meaning Norwood is pretty much on his own as Nouri cuts inside. Bogle had his man out wide, Anel had to watch Hwang. As the midfield is not back, Trusty can't stay centrally to just focus on defending a cross, he has to cover for Anel. JR is marking Lemina. Consequently we have no centre half to challenge for a back post cross.

Nowadays it is pretty easy to make a few yards for yourself against Norwood. He just doesn't have the legs to keep up with players when there is a bit of space. So Nouri is completely unchallenged as he looks up and puts in a perfect cross.
View attachment 179803

Larouci is improving, but defending crosses in the air seems to be something he's not used to doing.

In summary Wolves punish:

1) a midfield lacking numbers
2) centre halves being pulled out of position as they compensate for the struggling midfield
3) Norwood's lack of quick feet
4) Larouci's poor aerial ability/marking
I agree Larouci is improving and I could accept losing the man on the goal if he had end product going forward. Those 2 car crash attempts at cross that ballooned straight out were the deal breaker for me yesterday.

Don’t want to see him play for us again, if Baldock is back next week I’d rather have him at LWB and keep Bogle in the team.
 
I can take or leave the whole xG thing but I did find it a load of bollocks at the weekend.

Forman had the xG on Sunday as Wolves 1.31 v 0.58 Blades.

I’m sorry but that simply doesn’t pass the eye test.

Does that shock a few on here?
 
I can take or leave the whole xG thing but I did find it a load of bollocks at the weekend.

Forman had the xG on Sunday as Wolves 1.31 v 0.58 Blades.

I’m sorry but that simply doesn’t pass the eye test.

Does that shock a few on here?

Not hugely when looking at the shot locations - we didn’t really have anything central which are usually higher xG shots.

As always xG isn’t at its most useful when looking at individual games. This McAtee chance was ostensibly a one on one so “feels” like a really good chance but he ended up dribbling it into a low-percentage position before shooting, it turns out.

4A42A73F-D3FC-43E2-82E0-F7758A5E599B.jpeg
 
I agree Larouci is improving and I could accept losing the man on the goal if he had end product going forward. Those 2 car crash attempts at cross that ballooned straight out were the deal breaker for me yesterday.

Don’t want to see him play for us again, if Baldock is back next week I’d rather have him at LWB and keep Bogle in the team.
They were shocking attempts at crosses - can’t argue with that. He has, however, put in some excellent crosses in other games, following impressively fast forays down the wing. He’s a development player - and I believe that he was signed as such. He has potential, but inconsistency, which is what we should expect at this stage. He’s also an impressive natural athlete, which can’t be coached into somebody who isn’t.
I’m not saying he should be a Premier League starter, but I do think that we should persevere with him. He has potential in my judgement.
As pointed out in Bergen Blades’ analysis, he’s hardly helped out by the performances of his team mates at centre half and in midfield, and although he was clearly at fault with not putting a proper challenge in on the scorer, he wasn’t the only one at fault in the build-up to the goal.
 
Not hugely when looking at the shot locations - we didn’t really have anything central which are usually higher xG shots.

As always xG isn’t at its most useful when looking at individual games. This McAtee chance was ostensibly a one on one so “feels” like a really good chance but he ended up dribbling it into a low-percentage position before shooting, it turns out.

View attachment 179940
As you say limitations on one game. Very difficult to fully capture that both Brewster and McAtee were out through with a decent run at goal. Where they eventually shot from isn’t going to tell the whole picture.

Just to the casual observer it looks like Wolves were all over us in a routine win yet the eye test tells us that United had by far the better chances, in my opinion on what I saw anyway.

Though I should add I have started to wear glasses from time to time so maybe I’m not the best eye test after all! 😉
 
As you say limitations on one game. Very difficult to fully capture that both Brewster and McAtee were out through with a decent run at goal. Where they eventually shot from isn’t going to tell the whole picture.

Just to the casual observer it looks like Wolves were all over us in a routine win yet the eye test tells us that United had by far the better chances, in my opinion on what I saw anyway.

Though I should add I have started to wear glasses from time to time so maybe I’m not the best eye test after all! 😉
What really matters is whether you were "specs on" on "specs off" during the match...
 
I can take or leave the whole xG thing but I did find it a load of bollocks at the weekend.

Forman had the xG on Sunday as Wolves 1.31 v 0.58 Blades.

I’m sorry but that simply doesn’t pass the eye test.

Does that shock a few on here?

Generally, people who misunderstand XG take it too literally.

The stats are collected from tens of thousands of games and can't sensibly applied to just one game.
Over a season, the statistics will be proven but that relies on revrsion to the mean. If you take an individual XG of 0.7 for a striker to score, Brewster would miss but Salah would score. That isn't how XG is meant to be used, it's a longer term average.
 
Not really, if we’d have scored then they’d have scored another. We had some decent chances and didn’t do well enough with them. We let the cross come in to start with (Norwood) so it’s a combination of mistakes.
I’m not so sure about that. We nullified a good team. We’re too quick (like a Wednesday fan) sometimes to say a team was poor against us. I like to think we make a team look poor, and vice versa when it happens. When we got promoted the last two times there was a lot of ‘that was their * insert team name here worst game for ages. It’s not a coincidence. If it happens all season it’s because you’re good. Just like Wendy fans think teams have their best game against them. They don’t, they just make them look pap, because they are.

I think wolves are decent. We looked decent against them. It was a good performance. Sadly the small margins cost us. It was a heck of a ball for their goal. I’ll be honest, I don’t know if that was a small moment we could have prevented or not. We can’t prevent everything because we aren’t, for example Mourinho’s original Chelsea. We’re a mish mash of championship players and kids. Let’s not pretend otherwise.

As an aside I’d like the recruitment for next season to be like the league one/championship strategy of having about six captains in the team. Sign the best player from everyone beneath us. Sign their leaders. We can manage the championship and have another tilt.
 
I’m not so sure about that. We nullified a good team. We’re too quick (like a Wednesday fan) sometimes to say a team was poor against us. I like to think we make a team look poor, and vice versa when it happens. When we got promoted the last two times there was a lot of ‘that was their * insert team name here worst game for ages. It’s not a coincidence. If it happens all season it’s because you’re good. Just like Wendy fans think teams have their best game against them. They don’t, they just make them look pap, because they are.

I think wolves are decent. We looked decent against them. It was a good performance. Sadly the small margins cost us. It was a heck of a ball for their goal. I’ll be honest, I don’t know if that was a small moment we could have prevented or not. We can’t prevent everything because we aren’t, for example Mourinho’s original Chelsea. We’re a mish mash of championship players and kids. Let’s not pretend otherwise.

As an aside I’d like the recruitment for next season to be like the league one/championship strategy of having about six captains in the team. Sign the best player from everyone beneath us. Sign their leaders. We can manage the championship and have another tilt.
The last time we got promoted we made teams look poor though, this time teams just go a goal or 2 up and take their foot off the accelerator because they know we are impotent. Emery admitted that they stopped trying against us.
 
The last time we got promoted we made teams look poor though, this time teams just go a goal or 2 up and take their foot off the accelerator because they know we are impotent. Emery admitted that they stopped trying against us.
I thought that was particularly apparent last time we went down. Even though so many defeats were by a single goal it was because teams just got one ahead and stopped trying and saved their legs.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom