LBA_Blade
Active Member
The problem with football like most professional sports is that we don’t see/hear the conversations that went on in the board room. The new owners might have said they can’t work with Wilder due to his head strong and off field antics or they may have gone yes 92 points but wasn’t 100 like the 2 that went up and we couldn’t win a playoff final. We don’t know who has was talked to before the Selles appointment. The one thing I will give him, is that he talks a good game and comes over well. When you are looking for a new direction. One team to look at is Fulham when they were relegated they appointed Marco Silva, had a relegation on his cv and a few bits abroad but not much else and they absolutely smashed the championship to pieces.I'm yet to see how it was a good idea.
If you want to make that change from a manager who got 92 points and nearly took you up in the playoffs. You have your right man lined up.
We got rid and then deliberated to appoint Selles. Based on what? Scraping safety at Hull and some relatively promising stuff at Reading.
And then because he can "embrace the data"
The main data that counts is of course results. And during games it's how many chances you create and score and how many chances you give the opposition and concede. Because it will even out if you get that metric right.
We have scored one goal and conceded 12 in 5 games. And let's be honest we could have scored maybe 3 or 4 more across those games but we could have conceded at least another 3 or 4 so it's not like we can feel too hard done too.