We would of lost last year + Boro & Wba

[Woodward's Currie]

Have replays to add to their fixture list.

 

[Sheff de party]

*have

Of is not a verb.

 

[BritishSteel]

have , have, fucking have .

 

[knowsnowt]

Of at thee varlet!

 

[Bladesman]

I agree we would have lost this match last season. Probably 2-0 with a nice dollop of Norwich timewasting and shithousing thrown in.

 

[Woodward's Currie]

*have

Of is not a verb.

Thanks for the grammar lesson

 

[boo radley]

*have

Of is not a verb.

Gets me that, like RS presenter saying Subditute! He should be more pacific

 

[borg elite]

 

[Ranmoorblade]

*have

Of is not a verb.

 

[HydeParkBlade]

People who correct grammar online were grasses at school.

 

[knowsnowt]

People who dont like those correcting grammar love penis in the bum bum. FACT!

 

[Brian Deane]

People who dont like those correcting grammar love penis in the bum bum. FACT!

Dont knock it until you tried it As the old saying goes " women are alreet but ya can't beat the real thing "

 

[knowsnowt]

Dont knock it until you tried it As the old saying goes " women are alreet but ya can't beat the real thing "

You can have my quota.

Also. I really dont get people being irked by corrections. Are all teachers cunts for telling little Bartholomew hes mistakenly used a b where it should have been a d? Are some people excluded from learning?
Feel free to correct me on any grammar and punctuation mistakes btw.

 

[Sheff de party]

View attachment 48673

What would you like to know?

 

[Pinchy]

Thanks for the grammar lesson

It’s needed. What do you think ‘of’ means in your sentence?

 

[Pinchy]

People who correct grammar online were grasses at school.

If we simply use incorrect words that have no possible meaning in the context they are used how can we effectively coagulate with each hatstand?

 

[Pinchy]

Have replays to add to their fixture list.

That’s better.

 

[SteveBlade]

Sorry, I agree with the grammar police.

Using of instead of have is just unacceptable.

 

[Shirty Blade]

Its a well known fact that correct grammar can save lives!

'Lets eat grandma'. 'Lets eat, grandma'.

Right! I'm now off to get a life!

 

[vas borbokis]

Its a well known fact that correct grammar can save lives!

'Lets eat grandma'. 'Lets eat, grandma'.

Right! I'm now off to get a life!

Let's ffs. Apostrophes.com! ;-)

 

[itsinyerblood]

Interesting topic.

I had a bog standard type of education - secondary modern, then many years later I chose to go to what was then the Psalter Lane Polytechnic, which was referred to as tertiary education (so already loaded as far as levels of education go). Generally I have a preference for using and understanding the whole point of language and communication.....but, what I don't allow myself to do is become what some have called 'a grammar nazi'. I still find myself having to correct spelling and punctuation, and lessons are still learnt as a result, but what I do know is that there are those who struggle with language in the same way that I struggled with maths, science, british constitution, and still do. Should I castigate someone because they genuinely struggle with a subject, or should I attempt to understand that struggling is actually a form of social disablement, thus it should be a reason that I reach out and attempt to help them. I know that in some eyes that might appear wooly and patronising, but I don't differentiate between this and attempting to help someone who is homeless and has lost the capacity to get their feet on the first rung of social improvement.

 

[RammyBlade]

No shit ?

 

[SteveBlade]

Interesting topic.

I had a bog standard type of education - secondary modern, then many years later I chose to go to what was then the Psalter Lane Polytechnic, which was referred to as tertiary education (so already loaded as far as levels of education go). Generally I have a preference for using and understanding the whole point of language and communication.....but, what I don't allow myself to do is become what some have called 'a grammar nazi'. I still find myself having to correct spelling and punctuation, and lessons are still learnt as a result, but what I do know is that there are those who struggle with language in the same way that I struggled with maths, science, british constitution, and still do. Should I castigate someone because they genuinely struggle with a subject, or should I attempt to understand that struggling is actually a form of social disablement, thus it should be a reason that I reach out and attempt to help them. I know that in some eyes that might appear wooly and patronising, but I don't differentiate between this and attempting to help someone who is homeless and has lost the capacity to get their feet on the first rung of social improvement.

Paragraphs man!

 

[itsinyerblood]

Paragraphs man!

I gave you a substantial one man, do I need to compartmentalise every few sentences to suit the limited threshholds of those who can't be bothered to make an effort

 

[Pollingtonblade]

To the OP we won this fixture last year.

 

[Blend-it-like-Harris]

A day without learning is a day wasted....

 

[SteveBlade]

I gave you a substantial one man, do I need to compartmentalise every few sentences to suit the limited threshholds of those who can't be bothered to make an effort

Yes

 

[Greenwich Blade]

People who correct grammar online were grasses at school.

No I was not.

 

[Harrisblade]

Its a well known fact that correct grammar can save lives!

'Lets eat grandma'. 'Lets eat, grandma'.

Right! I'm now off to get a life!

It might already be too late!

 

[itsinyerblood]

Yes

Ah, no explanation offered other than a curt one word response.

Truth is, although I appreciate your comment it really depends on whether I wish to make the effort to give you a fighting chance of grasping something that's longer than a pithy excuse for something worthy.