Scooter_mcgavin
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2017
- Messages
- 9,751
- Reaction score
- 14,197
It's a pointless debate. Whats lowton achieved other than appearances?Thought he'd retired?
By your argument hes better than TAA.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
It's a pointless debate. Whats lowton achieved other than appearances?Thought he'd retired?
I'd rather have Baldock than a 30 year old Lowton 10x over.We'll pick up on this again when Baldock's PL career matches Lowton's.
We will talk again when Baldock has achieved the career highs that lowton has......I'd rather have Baldock than a 30 year old Lowton 10x over.
It's a pointless debate. Whats lowton achieved other than appearances?
By your argument hes better than TAA.
Yeah fair enough but your argument is utter bollocks, in fairnessHe's achieved the accolade of playing at the very top level for the past 7 years. It was generally accepted when he played for us that his future was as a wing back and he'd compliment our set-up very well in this respect. Age wise he's only a year older than Stevens so you can't use that against him. As I mentioned earlier we're not skint any more so pleading poverty is an excuse we can no longer use.
Oh, one can dreamWe will talk again when Baldock has achieved the career highs that lowton has......
He's achieved the accolade of playing at the very top level for the past 7 years. It was generally accepted when he played for us that his future was as a wing back and he'd compliment our set-up very well in this respect. Age wise he's only a year older than Stevens so you can't use that against him. As I mentioned earlier we're not skint any more so pleading poverty is an excuse we can no longer use.
I'd rather have Baldock than a 30 year old Lowton 10x over.
I think the first thing you have to ask is would he improve us.
I dont think he does so what would the point be..
I hope I am not alone in this, but when Baldock went down for a while against West Sham, I shit myself! Literally, what do we do if either him or Stevens are out for any length of time, in my book we do not have the right quality players to come in and do a job at this level, I know CW works miracles with players, and Freeman did a good job for a while before, but as we learned in The Championship, he is a quality lad but not really at the level we would need, and on the left even worse, I know the lad from Notts Forest can play there if needed, but for a length of time? in this division? I know people think we need to strengthen in January in a host of positions, but to me this should be priority one and two. Who agrees/disagrees?
Every player ages differently, so noHe's a year older than Stevens. Are you suggesting we should be considering a replacement for him too due to age?
What I don't understand and what is apparent in this thread is the mass hysteria which breaks out on this forum whenever you suggest a player who might actually challenge for a place, especially one who may be competing with one of the fans' favourites. This is usually followed by rubbishing them even though they've spent most of their career at the top. To doubt whether some like Lowton would improve us displays a level of childish ignorance, not to mention arrogance, which wouldn't go amiss on another well-know football forum.
Why did you buy 2 right backs?!I bought two wing backs in January on FIFA 20!!
Doubt we can get those though - Dalot (Man U) and Yedlin (Newcastle)
Saying that lowton is no improvement on baldock isnt childish ignorance. It's an opinion.
It's also.an opinion backed by facts like hes been in the team of the week on multiple occasions this season.
Lowton...no appearances.
If were going to spend cash, it has to be a shoe in for first team now, lowton wouldn't be in my opinion.
Ok, so I'll agree he improves the squad, but at his age, what he will cost etc, I'd rather go for someone younger. Reece james on loan or signingYou need more than 11 players in your 1st team squad you know, and they need to be greater than the "back-up" level which is often quoted on here.
And because I don't think Lowton is better than Baldock I/We are childishly ignorant? Eh?
Ok, so I'll agree he improves the squad, but at his age, what he will cost etc, I'd rather go for someone younger. Reece james on loan or signing
Are you on drugs, or some other sort of hallucinogenic substance? Thinking one player is better than another is not 'childish' or 'totally' ignorant in any way.Totally ignorant. See my post above. Believe it or not we are in the PL now an it's not uncommon to have players of equal ability competing for a start. Its not inconceivable for one of them to lose form or get injured and you have a ready made replacement stepping in. We've got to get rid of this poor relations mentality and get players in the squad other than washed-up old timers and lower league journeymen. We're established in the PL now, we just need to act like it.
because baldock is playing so well .. freeman is a decent player.. he’s certainly a better finisher than george ..IWWTWonder why that is.
bladey bladenessCome home Sir Kyle of Walker
Lowton?Are you on drugs, or some other sort of hallucinogenic substance? Thinking one player is better than another is not 'childish' or 'totally' ignorant in any way.
I don't give a fuck about the depth of the squad in this instance, you're talking about one player v another, and saying it's ignorant to suggest Baldock is better than Lowton - eh?
Why Lowton, because he's an ex-Blade? And I'm the ignorant one... derrr
Thank fuck for that. You are boring me to death.Nah, I'll save it for someone other than one of the self-appointed forum Nazis.
He's a defender first and foremost, so who gives a toss if he can finish better?because baldock is playing so well .. freeman is a decent player.. he’s certainly a better finisher than george ..IWWT
Are you on drugs, or some other sort of hallucinogenic substance? Thinking one player is better than another is not 'childish' or 'totally' ignorant in any way.
I don't give a fuck about the depth of the squad in this instance, you're talking about one player v another, and saying it's ignorant to suggest Baldock is better than Lowton - eh?
Why Lowton, because he's an ex-Blade? And I'm the ignorant one... derrr
agree.. i'm not bashing george he’s my favourite player as it happens but freeman is a decent backupHe's a defender first and foremost, so who gives a toss if he can finish better?
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?