larkymasher
Active Member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2016
- Messages
- 1,232
- Reaction score
- 1,948
Bush you do talk a lot of sense, but grounding young players is not all about playing week in week out. Its about introducing them to regular first team training, being involved in first team squads, getting on the bench, then being introduced to first team starts.The reason we need to think short term is not because of changing managers per se but because we've been in L1 for a long time, it's costing our owners too much money and isn't sustainable. We've already had to downgrade the academy due to lack of funds so it's pretty apparent that we need to get promotion as soon as we can, for the long term benefit of the club.
The practical matter of 'grounding' youth players is that to do so, you have to play them regularly.
So which of our players do you think are good enough to play first team football regularly and which current first team players do you think we should drop to facilitate this?
You seem to be suggesting we should drop a player like Coutts or Fleck, who are performing well for us, to play someone like Reed, who isn't even performing well in the u-23s, in the hope that he may one day be a good player.
This can take 1, 2, 3 years depending on the position, age of the player.
We seem to think that once these kids play for the U23s they should be ready or nearly ready. Some will be some wont.
I also seriously don't think any supporter would advocate dropping Coutts or Fleck to squeeze a player in just because he is from the academy. Once he shows he is good enough to do so then fine.
What i do have an issue with is Chapman being used over Brookes, why should we bring a young lad from Middlesboro on to the next level when we can do that with Brookes.
Why have we got Brown? When Whiteman can do no worse and probs better??
Just my opinion.