United 1 Birmingham 1 - report

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Deadbat

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2009
Messages
6,610
Reaction score
39,273
---

It was a frustrating afternoon at the Lane as a big, physical Birmingham side used a combination of organised defensive work mixed in with the dark arts to hold the Blades to a draw. United were far from their best in the least fluent home performance of the season and never really had control of a scrappy game. Credit to the visitors who did not sit back and in the end, they did deserve a draw with Deeney scoring to equalise after McBurnie’s hot streak had threatened to keep the home winning streak going. Too many key men were not really at it for United but they still had a golden chance at the end to win it but Sharp was denied by Ruddy.



With Ahmedhodzic confirmed as being out, Heckingbottom opted to start Khadra on the left but it remained to be seen if he would begin as a wing back or to the left of a 3 in a 4-3-3 formation. Doyle came in for Brewster in the only other chance. Davies and Bogle were on the bench and in a matchday squad00 for the first time this season. Birmingham had experienced duo Deeney and Hogan up front with Manchester United loanee Chong in midfield.



The game started and it seemed when the Blades were in possession, Khadra was more an orthodox wide man right up with McBurnie and Ndiaye but out of it he was more withdrawn but it did not seem quite like the normal 5-3-2/3-5-2 that has been the set up for the season. United had plenty of the ball early on but Birmingham were pressing and very competitive and it meant there was little space for creative talents like Berge and Ndiaye.



Baldock twice was caught out as Birmingham were not sitting back but the game was devoid of any clear chances so far. The tempo was quite slow with Blues happy to play on the break but a chance came when Khadra sent a dangerous cross which flicked off a defender and behind with Ruddy motionless.



At the other end Hogan looked to get on the shoulders but it was Chong who nearly got in before Norrington Davies got his foot in. Longelo was booked for chopping down Doyle who had started well before the same man hit a free kick that kissed the top of the bar as he looked to whip one in from the angle.



Berge had the best effort of the first half as he showed deft feet to come inside and his left footed effort was just the wrong side of the post. Ndiaye and McBurnie were struggling to get into it and Khadra’s selection had not really paid off. Neither keeper had a save to make so far and it was not a huge surprise when the half time came with no goals.





The second half came with a few skirmishes as Birmingham players going down at every opportunity and the physios being allowed on way too much. McBurnie and Bielik were booked for pushing each other before a decent ball from Baldock saw Ndiaye glance wide. United tried to increase the pace but there was never a really sustained period of pressure.



Hogan nearly got into Deeney’s flick as the game was certainly not all one-way traffic even if United were looking the more likely to create something. Bogle and Brewster came on for Khadra and Doyle and it was not long after the deadlock was broken.



A free kick came over from Norwood and the ball was not properly cleared and as it sad MCBURNIE turned and swivelled to hit a superb rising half volley right into the top corner giving Ruddy no chance. It continued the excellent run of form the striker as he broke the stalemate in a tight game. Mejbri came on for Bacuna as Birmingham tried to look to respond.



After a few more lusty challenges going in, Bond called both captains together before McBurnie was replaced by Sharp but soon after the visitors got level.



The ball bounced out and it seemed it came off a Birmingham player but the corner was given and it proved costly as after the resulting kick was not cleared it was played back in and a flicked header from Bielik saw DEENEY completely clear and beating the offside trap. United’s defence stood and watched as the experienced striker picked his spot to finish easily past Foderingham.



Norwood was booked for a foul on Chong and the physio came on three more times as Hall relaced Chong who had clearly been fine a few minutes before despite rolling around for some time before McAtee replaced Ndiaye. Referee Bond deemed there would be 7 minutes of stoppage time and inside this period Brewster had one effort over after good work from Bogle before an even better chance came soon after.



Berge had not been a factor but ran forward and slipped in Sharp but the striker maybe took too long and Ruddy came out and spread himself to make the save. There was still time and ended up being almost 100 minutes of play (due to the visitors attempts to take the sting out of the game) but United ran out of time and could not force a winner.



United – A draw was about right. We cannot win them all and it was unrealistic to expect us just to destroy everyone at home. We have had comfortable wins every home game with superb performances and goals. Today we met a physical, hard working and well organised Birmingham team. They were big and awkward and did time waste/milk injuries and went down and did that they had to not helped by a weak referee at times (he was ok in general play). However, they definitely deserved a draw. They did not just sit back and defend and had some chances on the break and got men forward when they could. United had the better of the opportunities with a few half chances and the Berge effort but 2nd half even though we improved, not sure we had any fluency and it was all a bit stop start. We did not get enough out of Ndiaye and Berge, the two men we expect to unlock teams as both flattered to deceive and looked leggy (maybe the travelling/games last few weeks took their toll?) and in the end when we scored, I was a bit surprised as not sure I felt it had been coming for either side.



We then need to just see it out and take the scruffy 1-0 but poor defending (was it a corner before?) saw us lose a header and some came out and some stayed back and the marking was terrible. It was a gift of a goal. After this I felt for a spell, they looked as likely as us even if there were not many chances but then Brewster and Sharp (with a very good one) had chances at the end. It would have flattered us as I thought Birmingham as horrible and niggly as they were, they were very competitive and got in our faces. However, for all that we had lots of the ball and did not move it quick enough and the tempo was way too slow.



Tactics wise, many seem convinced it was just Khadra in a wing back but not sure it was. Baldock was further back in the shape and Khadra was more pushed right up down the left. He seemed more of a winger in a 4-3-3 – certainly when we had the ball. Not sure he ever came back into our defensive half? Whatever the formation was intended – his selection did not work and he was extremely poor losing the ball and not really offering us anything. He looks woefully unfit to me and might be best as an impact sub.



All in all, I am not too down. We were not fantastic at Swansea and Preston either and could argue the points we took from there were maybe more than we deserved. Both games quite even on the whole. Today we did not create very much at all against a lowly side and too many were just not quite at it. We lacked zip and energy and the tempo was way too slow. Yes, the tactics of them to slow and spoil down was annoying but we need to be better – we need to move it quicker and get it into areas to hurt them. It was all a bit safe really.



Still, it’s not a disaster. We hopefully will come back with a bit more purpose and it might have given them a bit of a kick up the backside. I felt a few were a bit sluggish and just expected things to happen today and if teams come and compete at this level, then you will not just blow teams away. We will have more games like that at the Lane I am sure but we need the players to be better than they were if we expect to put sides like that away. We were not terrible by any means but it was a very average performance and not enough to win the game.
 



Ratings:



Foderingham 6/10 – Little to do. Took a few catches. Little chance on the goal as he got no protection. One poor kick out again.



Baldock 6/10 – Thought to begin he was really poor and gave away a few free kicks and got skinned but he got better and nearly set up Berge for a chance and got into good areas. Few ok crosses too – like the pone to Ndiaye. He was always in good areas but the quality sometimes still fell down.



Norrington Davies 7/10 – Another really solid game. Only one misplaced pass. Got stuck in, made interceptions and was able to get to the ball first. A few decent runs forward but mostly more withdrawn today.



Basham 7/10 – Thought that was the best Bash has played for ages and more like his old self. Won most of his challenges, used it well and supported the attack. Thought he was really solid today.



Egan 6/10 – Fine for the most part but a few times he let Hogan get the ball and run down the side and stood off when he should have cleared long before. No idea what happened on the goal as numerous defenders stood around. Back to his terrible attacking ways for us after his goals for Ireland and headed one miles over!



Khadra 4/10 – Really disappointing on the whole. One cross that drifted off a defender and wide early and then he lost the ball almost every time he had it. Seemed to lack desire in physical challenges but also, he did not really show any pace or running. He just flicked it to a defender or ran into trouble quickly. I am not even sure he knew where he should be playing – as I say I am not convinced he was an orthodox left wing back – seemed way too wide and high up? Second half same story and not surprised he came off. Needs to do much better if he wants more minutes.



Norwood 6.5/10 – He was ok with some neat passes and switches but some of his diagonals were floated or driven too far. Not everything came off but he kept looking for it and some ok balls mixed in. Daft yellow card again. Still at the heart of good things we did but lacked movement in a static frontline today.



Doyle 7.5/10 – Thought along with RND and Bash, he was out best player so surprised he was taken off? Maybe he was tiring but seemed fine to me and our best midfielder. Energetic, got into good areas and did a bit of everything. He is a busy and tidy player and I like what I see of him.



Berge 5.5/10 – Very quiet most of the game but did have one decent shot wide after neat footwork and nearly set up Sharp for the chance but overall, he drifted too much and looked too passive. He got shoved off it a few times and conceded the corner for the goal and then a daft free kick which could have cost us. Needs to be much more involved and purposeful. Just coasting today and sadly he has one of these games too often for me which may explain why he has not yet moved on. I would have taken him off actually – not Doyle.



Ndiaye 5/10 – As above. Him and Berge are our best attacking players but he was never in the game save maybe one run in the first half and shot badly off target and another second half where he ran out of space. Too poor headers at goal too. A few neat touches but for long periods I forgot he was playing. Poorest he has been this season.



McBurnie 6/10 – Not sure he had his best game and back to trying to fight and push players, often for no reason. He did not quite seem to be closing and chasing as much as other games and before he scored, I was thinking we may take him off. Great finish though from barely a half chance and hammered it home – after we have all been critical of his weak kicking/shooting! I perhaps would have left him on as after that we did not carry a threat when they scored. It was maybe too hasty.





Subs –



Brewster 5/10 – He runs around but lacks quality and not sure he quite gets where to run. He never really ever looks like scoring for United which is a worry for a striker who is meant to be a natural finisher. He blazed one over when well placed after good work from Bogle.



Bogle 6/10 – Bit mixed. One good run and a few neat dribbles but also lost it a few times or ran the wrong way. Not sure why he went left wing back. I would have got him down the right somehow where he can be such a threat.



Sharp 5/10 – Few bits and pieces of hold up but the one big chance and he has to score really. It was on his wrong foot but took too long and the keeper got to him. I would have backed him to score when it landed at his feet.



McAtee – Not long enough to make an impact.



Manager: Heckingbottom 6/10 – Team did not work. At the selection a few of us in the pub were pleased with the attacking players being played and maybe having less defenders and getting more of our better offensive threats in. We felt Brum would sit deep but, in the end, they made it a bit of a battle and we did not really get behind them. Khadra lacks the stamina to get up and down and he was a passenger. The strikers were too isolated also and it became a bit fragmented. Even though we scored, I felt the changes saw players being put in wrong areas/positions and it was all a bit ragged. We never had proper control of the game (neither did they) and for the home side did not create much at all. The players just lacked energy and leggy and maybe that is not down to him but he took off the best player Doyle which was odd. Not sure Bogle down that side worked either really. After we had made the changes and they then scored, we had to change shape again for me. He is hamstring with the injuries and easy to say in retrospect that he should not have done what he did but if the players are just not quite at it, then maybe it is not always down to him but the tempo needed to be much quicker.





Birmingham – Deserved draw. Horrible and cynical with some ridiculous time wasting but they did not sit back and had threats with Hogan and Deeney on the break. They were a big and tall side that got stuck in and were pressing us all over. We struggled to break them down and they were quite organised. Still Doyle/Berge had chances and then we scored but they did keep going and got a leveller. After that it was still quite even and you did not think we were any more likely to win it than them.



Not the best to watch in terms of a football side and quite direct and basic. The spoiling tactics and players going down was allowed to happen so they did what they had to. Weird they resorted to this as when they got it down and played a bit or tried to attack, they looked dangerous so was strange way to try and play. I had them to go down but I am not sure after that. They will make games scrappy and have goal threats to get enough to maybe get away from trouble.





Opponent Man of the Match – Hogan was actually livelier than he was anytime at the Lane and got into some good areas. The lad in midfield, Bielik was dirty but effective too. Chong was lively if guilty of cheating at the end. However, the defence was very good and Trusty and Sanderson both jointly did a good job on our attacking players.



Opponent Weak link – Bacuna had one run at the start but then faded badly and was withdrawn. Not sure Deeney did much at all but then of course he scored (same as McBurnie).



Referee/Officials – Darren Bond. Return of the ‘alice band’ we thought after we only saw him a few weeks ago in the win at Swansea! However, he has had a haircut and there was no accessory. He has been quite good for us with wins against Norwich in the Promotion season and the big win v Hull the previous season. He also reffed us in the win against Middlesbrough when Evans scored that volley but sent off Simon Moore at Wolves too.



Today in general terms he was ok not helped by two abysmal assistants, particularly the one on the South Stand side who seemed like they never wanted to make a decision. I was annoyed with the players going down but he did add almost 10 minutes on. If the player refuses to get up, then can the ref just wave the physio away and allow the game to go on? Be interesting as sure they may get up then! I thought for a spell after the break when pushing and shoving broke out, he lost control a bit but actually not sure he was that bad in general decisions. Would need to see the corner again to see if it went out off our man or a Birmingham one – looked a goal kick to me but I am a fair way from it.



Matchday/Crowd/Coverage – Crowd was really quiet and it was quite subdued actually. I think the Lane fans have to do much better for me. We are top and have been playing great and it seemed so subdued again.
 
Am I the only one who saw McBurnie swing a punch at a Birmingham player during the last melee before he scored?
 
Berge did have a few decisive blocks and tackles ,some of his breaking up sets us directly on the country.
 
Berge did have a few decisive blocks and tackles ,some of his breaking up sets us directly on the country.
He seems to have a good understanding with sharp threading him through ( or nearly )a few times which he doesn't seem to do with anyone else
 
It was between Norwood and Basham for man of the match for me. Both were great today. I don't think I've ever seen Norwood put in such effort and so may tackles off the ball. That said Bash gets it for me.

Baldock was once again so wasteful on the ball. Several times he had players beaten and the ball rolled in front of him. Instead of crossing he cut back and passed backwards. At one point in the second half someone passed back to him when play was going down the left. No Birmingham players were anywhere near him and all he had to do was go wide and run with it. Did he? Nope. He immediately turned around and passed it back to Basham.

Seriously, what is up with him? Why does he do this week in, week out? He stops our attacks for the opposition with his negative "forward" play. Thank goodness Bogle is coming back. He may have had a mixed bag game today, albeit out of position and retuning from injury, but at least he was trying to be positive going forward. George frustrates the hell out of me.
 
We missed Anel.
Khadra never a defender.
Brooks or Gomis should be LWB.
Ndiaye & Berge poor - are they getting complacent ? Believing in their own newspaper reports ?
Doyle should not be hooked.
When Bogle comes on after long absence , should be on R + swap Baldock to LWB , especially as Bogle can attack more effectively than Baldock.
McB should not go off when we will face aerial bombardment.
Yes we are knackered by injuries but have chosen not to recruit to cover.
Some very strange decisions by Hecky in setup + in subs.
We ought to have done much better today.
Intrigued to see if Hecky's learned from this performance + makes better decisions Tuesday.
 
I saw that, looked like a left hook to me. Can’t believe he didn’t get sent off
Definite left hook. He wasn't even involved in the play that led to the scuffle so why he got involved let alone threw a punch is behind me. He was lucky to still be on the pitch and I was pleased to see Hecky sub him before he picked up a stupid second yellow or straight red.
 
The dreaded international break struck again. We were languid, listless and lacked a left side. The build up play was at snail pace at times allowing Brum to get players behind the ball. No pace or sharpness in midfield, too often looking to pass sideways or back.

Game was a virtual re run of the first game at Home last season when they got an early goal and then sat behind the ball for the rest of the game. Ultimately our achilles heel cost us two points, our inability to defend balls in the air at the back. Deeney bullied our back 3 in the air all afternoon and they went awol on the goal. We were due a bad result after a good run of luck but our unbalanced team didn't help. Brum showed again how to stop us playing and other teams will take note.

Frustrating that we still continue to put 10 men behind the ball at Home when defending set pieces. Khedra and Ndiaye on the half way line would have provided a quick out ball. Against teams that set out to defend and disrupt we have to find ways to counter quickly. Thought Deeney was a constant problem throughout and Chong at a paltry £1.5 million looks a bargain.

Berge was too deep and even deeper when we inexplicably took off Doyle. His best position is 10. When he doesn't play there we regress into wilderball and effectively cut off the two forwards. Last season we would have lost that game to a late goal and I feared it would happen again when Berge gave away a free kick late on. On that performance its a point gained. We need to be out of the traps much faster on Tuesday.
 
It was between Norwood and Basham for man of the match for me. Both were great today. I don't think I've ever seen Norwood put in such effort and so may tackles off the ball. That said Bash gets it for me.

Baldock was once again so wasteful on the ball. Several times he had players beaten and the ball rolled in front of him. Instead of crossing he cut back and passed backwards. At one point in the second half someone passed back to him when play was going down the left. No Birmingham players were anywhere near him and all he had to do was go wide and run with it. Did he? Nope. He immediately turned around and passed it back to Basham.

Seriously, what is up with him? Why does he do this week in, week out? He stops our attacks for the opposition with his negative "forward" play. Thank goodness Bogle is coming back. He may have had a mixed bag game today, albeit out of position and retuning from injury, but at least he was trying to be positive going forward. George frustrates the hell out of me.
I have seen him do this time & time again - i just can't understand his thinking when there is green space all the way to the byline.
Maybe he need electrobrainwashing to get Wilderball out of his system ?
So frustrating.
Today I would have put him LWB + told him to be more defensive and put Bogle RWB + told him he was Jairzinho
 
I have seen him do this time & time again - i just can't understand his thinking when there is green space all the way to the byline.
Maybe he need electrobrainwashing to get Wilderball out of his system ?
So frustrating.
Today I would have put him LWB + told him to be more defensive and put Bogle RWB + told him he was Jairzinho
Me too. I was expecting him to go left and Bogle right. One of a couple of strange decision made by Hecky. I like Hecky but I do think he is tactically naive sometimes.
 



Post World cup I have a fear of post lockdown form.
He needs to get a proper grip of them and ensure cohesion, fitness, and training are at full fucking throttle for that month. We seem to make a balls of it after those shitty international breaks which are a fucking pain in the arse anyway.
 
Cheers DB. Berge a 5 for me today. Not involved until last 5 minutes, too deep, completely failed to track Chong for his chance in the 1st half.
 
Hecky 2/10 and Billy the same for me. No need to make the substitutions, the shape was bad enough and changing it made us look even worse.

Nowt against Billy but come on, they had big lads at the back and he was never going to out strength them, he does nothing defensively, whereas McBurnie would have helped with covering the corner that eventually resulted in us conceding. Then he gets the one on one and fucks it up. Fucking hell Hecky, concentrate on winning games, not picking your mates.
 
Spot on with the report Deadbat

Couldn't understand the subs and particularly the timing. Doyle was our best midfielder, doing all the spade work and in my view you don't start changing it when you've just taken the lead.
 
The 3 away wins meant that this was not a bad result but puts a bit of pressure to get a win on Tuesday with an awkward away fixture at Stoke next week. The absence of left sided player options is restricting us at the moment as it means we have to put at least one square peg into a round hole. Would also have put Bogle right and Baldock left as Baldock is the better defender. Maybe sees Bogle more 2 footed than Baldock. Also didn't look a corner for the goal but both assistants were useless all afternoon and we should have defended better. Do that and we win 1 0 when only at about 50% performance.
 
The ball bounced out and it seemed it came off a Birmingham player but the corner was given and it proved costly as after the resulting kick was not cleared it was played back in and a flicked header from Bielik saw DEENEY completely clear and beating the offside trap. United’s defence stood and watched as the experienced striker picked his spot to finish easily past Foderingham.
Berge, not Bielik flicked the header
 
Berge, not Bielik flicked the header
The ball bounced out and it seemed it came off a Birmingham player but the corner was given and it proved costly as after the resulting kick was not cleared it was played back in and a flicked header from Bielik saw DEENEY completely clear and beating the offside trap. United’s defence stood and watched as the experienced striker picked his spot to finish easily past Foderingham.

It can be difficult for defences to decide when to go back to zonal marking after man marking at a set piece. We were man marking for the corner:

1664738018890.png
Egan - Trusty
Bash - Sanderson
Berge - Bielik
Baldock - Hogan
RND - Deeney
Bogle - Hannibal

Zone men: Norwood, Sharp, Ndiaye

Basham wins the original ball and nods it out of the box. Ndiaye challenges Graham, then Chong, but he struggles to keep up with the latter on the edge of the box. This is the situation and the dilemma is:

A) Are we still defending the set piece with man marking instructions?
Or
B) have we switched back to open play defending, i.e. zonal marking?

1664739400829.png

Voting A:
Egan
is staying with Trusty and Berge has followed Bielik. Bogle is also staying close to Hannibal. So three of our markers are still treating the situation as a corner situation where they are man marking.

Voting B:
Baldock
has left Hogan, RND has let Deeney go, and Basham has let Sanderson go back. So three markers have let their men go and seem to be treating this as an open play situation.


So it's a bit confusing! Basham and RND seems to have picked up new men in Deeney and Hogan respectively. But then Basham seems to spot his original task - Sanderson in some space outside the box. He panics and runs towards Sanderson, leaving Deeney unmarked:


1664739624373.png

Berge doesn't look particularly worried as his man isn't in a great position, but Bielik jumps, causing Berge to jump as well and Berge actually connects with the ball. This outmaneuvers zone man Sharp and the ball falls to Deeney, who scores.


IT is a bit difficult, but I think Hecky needs to get the lads together and decide on some general rules, which may include giving Egan the responsibility to signal whether we should keep man marking or switch to open play zonal defending when a set piece is half cleared.

It would have been interesting to hear what Basham was thinking?

1. He doesn't notice Deeney?
2. He thinks Egan is coming in to mark Deeney?
3. He reckons Deeney is RND's man, as planned?
4. He just wants to be clever and cut out the probable pass to Sanderson?

The goal here:

 
Bash has got Deeney - we can see this because he actually touches Deeney's arm with his hand thereby laying claim to him - then , one second later , Bash inexplicably runs off + leaves Deeney - it's a mad rush of blood to Bash's head , going out to cover a Brummie on the edge of the box - a second later the ball finds Deeney + Bash is just stood marking no one
 
It shouldn't have mattered though , we spurned plenty of chances to win this game.
The brilliant backheel by Ndiaye in the first half should have been buried by our guy who fell over his own feet.
Ndiaye himself missed at least 2 good chances - he can't head a ball quite as well as MGW ... Yet.
Then my hero Billy at the end - why take second touch ? Bury it first time.
 
It can be difficult for defences to decide when to go back to zonal marking after man marking at a set piece. We were man marking for the corner:

View attachment 144914
Egan - Trusty
Bash - Sanderson
Berge - Bielik
Baldock - Hogan
RND - Deeney
Bogle - Hannibal

Zone men: Norwood, Sharp, Ndiaye

Basham wins the original ball and nods it out of the box. Ndiaye challenges Graham, then Chong, but he struggles to keep up with the latter on the edge of the box. This is the situation and the dilemma is:

A) Are we still defending the set piece with man marking instructions?
Or
B) have we switched back to open play defending, i.e. zonal marking?

View attachment 144916

Voting A:
Egan
is staying with Trusty and Berge has followed Bielik. Bogle is also staying close to Hannibal. So three of our markers are still treating the situation as a corner situation where they are man marking.

Voting B:
Baldock
has left Hogan, RND has let Deeney go, and Basham has let Sanderson go back. So three markers have let their men go and seem to be treating this as an open play situation.


So it's a bit confusing! Basham and RND seems to have picked up new men in Deeney and Hogan respectively. But then Basham seems to spot his original task - Sanderson in some space outside the box. He panics and runs towards Sanderson, leaving Deeney unmarked:


View attachment 144919

Berge doesn't look particularly worried as his man isn't in a great position, but Bielik jumps, causing Berge to jump as well and Berge actually connects with the ball. This outmaneuvers zone man Sharp and the ball falls to Deeney, who scores.


IT is a bit difficult, but I think Hecky needs to get the lads together and decide on some general rules, which may include giving Egan the responsibility to signal whether we should keep man marking or switch to open play zonal defending when a set piece is half cleared.

It would have been interesting to hear what Basham was thinking?

1. He doesn't notice Deeney?
2. He thinks Egan is coming in to mark Deeney?
3. He reckons Deeney is RND's man, as planned?
4. He just wants to be clever and cut out the probable pass to Sanderson?

The goal here:



Brilliant analysis….really appreciate the effort.

I didn’t see who the author was…..but thought this is the type of analysis Bergen blade does.
Did wonder if you had some competition…but then I checked and should have known it was you.

Regards your post
it was criminal how Deeny was left in so much space directly in front of goal.
When he scores you can see our defenders looking around thinking “who was marking him”
Surely something went wrong there. As Keen says looks like a Basham error, leaving his man.
 
Referee/Officials – Darren Bond. Return of the ‘alice band’ we thought after we only saw him a few weeks ago in the win at Swansea! However, he has had a haircut and there was no accessory. He has been quite good for us with wins against Norwich in the Promotion season and the big win v Hull the previous season. He also reffed us in the win against Middlesbrough when Evans scored that volley but sent off Simon Moore at Wolves too.



Today in general terms he was ok not helped by two abysmal assistants, particularly the one on the South Stand side who seemed like they never wanted to make a decision. I was annoyed with the players going down but he did add almost 10 minutes on. If the player refuses to get up, then can the ref just wave the physio away and allow the game to go on? Be interesting as sure they may get up then! I thought for a spell after the break when pushing and shoving broke out, he lost control a bit but actually not sure he was that bad in general decisions. Would need to see the corner again to see if it went out off our man or a Birmingham one – looked a goal kick to me but I am a fair way from it.

His decisions, when there was actual play, were OK by me (in the main). The fact he was totally complicit in them sucking the life out of the game with constant (from minute 3) time wasting is completely unforgivable.
He seemed to reach for his back pocket, at around 28 minutes, as though he was going to card the keeper. If he had we might have seen another 15/20 minutes of actual play. Cowardly (as most officials are) in his not clamping down on it.
 



It can be difficult for defences to decide when to go back to zonal marking after man marking at a set piece. We were man marking for the corner:

View attachment 144914
Egan - Trusty
Bash - Sanderson
Berge - Bielik
Baldock - Hogan
RND - Deeney
Bogle - Hannibal

Zone men: Norwood, Sharp, Ndiaye

Basham wins the original ball and nods it out of the box. Ndiaye challenges Graham, then Chong, but he struggles to keep up with the latter on the edge of the box. This is the situation and the dilemma is:

A) Are we still defending the set piece with man marking instructions?
Or
B) have we switched back to open play defending, i.e. zonal marking?

View attachment 144916

Voting A:
Egan
is staying with Trusty and Berge has followed Bielik. Bogle is also staying close to Hannibal. So three of our markers are still treating the situation as a corner situation where they are man marking.

Voting B:
Baldock
has left Hogan, RND has let Deeney go, and Basham has let Sanderson go back. So three markers have let their men go and seem to be treating this as an open play situation.


So it's a bit confusing! Basham and RND seems to have picked up new men in Deeney and Hogan respectively. But then Basham seems to spot his original task - Sanderson in some space outside the box. He panics and runs towards Sanderson, leaving Deeney unmarked:


View attachment 144919

Berge doesn't look particularly worried as his man isn't in a great position, but Bielik jumps, causing Berge to jump as well and Berge actually connects with the ball. This outmaneuvers zone man Sharp and the ball falls to Deeney, who scores.


IT is a bit difficult, but I think Hecky needs to get the lads together and decide on some general rules, which may include giving Egan the responsibility to signal whether we should keep man marking or switch to open play zonal defending when a set piece is half cleared.

It would have been interesting to hear what Basham was thinking?

1. He doesn't notice Deeney?
2. He thinks Egan is coming in to mark Deeney?
3. He reckons Deeney is RND's man, as planned?
4. He just wants to be clever and cut out the probable pass to Sanderson?

The goal here:


Although a really disappointing goal to concede, it's also interesting to study how it happened, so many thanks for giving it your usual top class analysis.
It does seem to be that Bash spotted his allocated man (Sanderson) had wandered to the edge of the area and started moving towards him, completely leaving the much bigger threat - Deeney.
Very poor from Bash, including the initial header from the corner.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom