robbiez666
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 19,237
- Reaction score
- 26,540
- Banned
- #31
I'd be all for throwing the first rounds of both cups if it guaranteed promotion. It doesn't
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
they prioritised the league and the jpt is shitSo Bristol City haven't won the league and the JPT then?
Surely the cup run would have ruined their chances of pissing the league?
Oh, wait a minute ..........
They still won a cup compo and won the league. Good cup runs and gaining auto promo are not mutually exclusive.they prioritised the league and the jpt is shit
They still won a cup compo and won the league. Good cup runs and gaining auto promo are not mutually exclusive.
Fact is we bottle too many games and don't have the mental toughness or the leadership to overcome the obstacles placed in our way
We rested players in league games because we wanted tgem fit for cup matchesThey still won a cup compo and won the league. Good cup runs and gaining auto promo are not mutually exclusive.
Fact is we bottle too many games and don't have the mental toughness or the leadership to overcome the obstacles placed in our way
And tgat is exactly my pointdont think playing walsall in a competition only Johnsons paints board enjoys is quite as wearing as playing tottenham home and away
Why would we play 60 games if we prioritise promotion by resting players in the cupswe will end up having played more than 60 competitive games
busting a gut before the play offs start would be crazy , lets focus on the post season championship and go for a 3 match winning run
No cos they've had a decent balance in the side from the beginning of the season and all parties knew what they were about. They've had a settled side with 12 players playing more than 40 games this season and Cotterill has no need to chop and change. Settled side, balanced side, mixture of craft and graft, strength and guile, power and pace.We rested players in league games because we wanted tgem fit for cup matches
bet bristol city didnt do that
All fair points but not sure what any of tgat has to do with what ive been sayingNo cos they've had a decent balance in the side from the beginning of the season and all parties knew what they were about. They've had a settled side with 12 players playing more than 40 games this season and Cotterill has no need to chop and change. Settled side, balanced side, mixture of craft and graft, strength and guile, power and pace.
It's a recipe that we appear to be still struggling to comprehend - hence the mammoth squad and the lack of quality in depth. Chop and change, square pegs in round holes - out of necessity or bad planning?
Any review of the current season should conclude that it shouldn't have taken hindsight to see where the problems lay and why the fuck wasn't the CB problem and the CF issue treated as a top priority?
If main targets were not achievable is it right that we appeared to just sit and wait or should we have gone for alternatives?
You've been away so long you just lost yer touch, is allAll fair points but not sure what any of tgat has to do with what ive been saying
cup semis are good revenue providers , plus our cup runs are good for our profileWhy would we play 60 games if we prioritise promotion by resting players in the cups
lets face it if , nay when we go up , when we play championship clubs again our cup runs will make them more wary of our capabilities
and we get chosen for more tv games again more revenue
its how it works now
Somehow Cotterill has transformed a bunch of Championship misfits and has beens plus a few L1 journeymen into champions.No cos they've had a decent balance in the side from the beginning of the season and all parties knew what they were about. They've had a settled side with 12 players playing more than 40 games this season and Cotterill has no need to chop and change. Settled side, balanced side, mixture of craft and graft, strength and guile, power and pace.
It's a recipe that we appear to be still struggling to comprehend - hence the mammoth squad and the lack of quality in depth. Chop and change, square pegs in round holes - out of necessity or bad planning?
Any review of the current season should conclude that it shouldn't have taken hindsight to see where the problems lay and why the fuck wasn't the CB problem and the CF issue treated as a top priority?
If main targets were not achievable is it right that we appeared to just sit and wait or should we have gone for alternatives?
No cos they've had a decent balance in the side from the beginning of the season and all parties knew what they were about. They've had a settled side with 12 players playing more than 40 games this season and Cotterill has no need to chop and change. Settled side, balanced side, mixture of craft and graft, strength and guile, power and pace.
It's a recipe that we appear to be still struggling to comprehend - hence the mammoth squad and the lack of quality in depth. Chop and change, square pegs in round holes - out of necessity or bad planning?
it did when we lost to lower league swanseaSo all those seasons when the likes of Blackwell and Wilson bailed out of the cups at the first attempt to the likes of Hartlepool were all forgiven because it guaranteed us promotion then?
Then back to the real world. No it fucking didnt
it did when we lost to lower league swansea
Yeah thats what i meantWe got relegated that year. You mean Colchester the year before.
it did when we lost to lower league swansea
Yeah thats what i meant![]()
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?