The assault on O'Hare

[GreasyChipBeattie]

From the angle behind O'Hare after he scores, the keeper clearly 'does him'
There is a definite intention to boot him.
Cynical and dangerous and should be looked at as a retrospective red card.

You can see it clearly here at 3 mins 42 secs

 

[Bladesman]

From the angle behind O'Hare after he scores, the keeper clearly 'does him'
There is a definite intention to boot him.
Cynical and dangerous and should be looked at as a retrospective red card.

You can see it clearly here at 3 mins 42 secs

He wasn’t shown a card for it either so if I was Wilder I’d be on to this.

He was only booked for pushing Peck over.

 

[Blade56]

Leave that leg out dangerously imo. Club should follow up on it

 

[Carlton Blade]

When we scored the 2nd, Furlong tried to decapitate O'Hare as well. Kipre got a booking for similar too.

 

[Bladesman]

When we scored the 2nd, Furlong tried to decapitate O'Hare as well. Kipre got a booking for similar too.

I guess we had the wrong colour shirts on.

 

[Carlton Blade]

I guess we had the wrong colour shirts on.

Kieran McKenna = Poundland Eddie Howe. Ipswich were cowardly, cynical, whiny little Weaselcunts of a team

 

[Yewsman]

I have seen a single shot photo from the side. Can’t up load it on here unfortunately. It looks really bad and cast iron red. Hope the club Perseus it after all the fuss and red cards at Charlton. Not sure the rules allow retrospective punishment?

 

[Carlton Blade]

I have seen a single shot photo from the side. Can’t up load it on here unfortunately. It looks really bad and cast iron red. Hope the club Perseus it after all the fuss and red cards at Charlton. Not sure the rules allow retrospective punishment?

I think it's one that wouldn't be overturned if given as a red, but won't be punished post match. I think it was most likely accidental, but it was also dangerous

 

[Yewsman]

Here’s photo. It’s from Danny halls face book page.

I have seen a single shot photo from the side. Can’t up load it on here unfortunately. It looks really bad and cast iron red. Hope the club Perseus it after all the fuss and red cards at Charlton. Not sure the rules allow retrospective punishment?

I have seen a single shot photo from the side. Can’t up load it on here unfortunately. It looks really bad and cast iron red. Hope the club Perseus it after all the fuss and red cards at Charlton. Not sure the rules allow retrospective punishment?

See below. Managed to get photo. It’s from Danny Halls Facebook and is on another post on here.

 

[wadblade]

only a red if in stripes and managed by CW

 

[wadblade]

Here’s photo. It’s from Danny halls face book page.
View attachment 229705


See below. Managed to get photo. It’s from Danny Halls Facebook and is on another post on here.

only a red if in stripes and managed by CW

 

[Yewsman]

I think it's one that wouldn't be overturned if given as a red, but won't be punished post match. I think it was most likely accidental, but it was also dangerous

Dangerous? Understatement I think. It’s only inches from his eye. When you look at the full video from tv he deliberately raised his foot. Was he in control?

 

[Billyblade]

COH dinked it over him. He'll argue he raised his foot to try and stop the ball.

 

[Pintor75]

Not watched highlights yet, but watching it from where I was SS, he seemed to keep his leg up to clatter O'Hare

 

[Chimpan-A]

I have seen a single shot photo from the side. Can’t up load it on here unfortunately. It looks really bad and cast iron red. Hope the club Perseus it after all the fuss and red cards at Charlton. Not sure the rules allow retrospective punishment?

Yes, it was a real Clash of the Titans.

 

[Karaoke Blade]

Not watched highlights yet, but watching it from where I was SS, he seemed to keep his leg up to clatter O'Hare

He moved his foot towards his face. Ref probably did us a favour keeping the useless cunt on the pitch. Remember the name...Christian Walton. Should get a nice reception should he ever visit the Lane again.

 

[Chimpan-A]

Dangerous? Understatement I think. It’s only inches from his eye. When you look at the full video from tv he deliberately raised his foot. Was he in control?

This is the inconsistency isn’t it? Soumare doesn’t particularly lunge in but his follow through, after winning the ball, is seems as serious foul play. That keeper deliberately sticks his foot out (don’t tell me that’s a “natural position”) and gets nothing, everyone accepts it is his momentum.

 

[Yellarbellyblade]

Definitely a red if done by an outfield player but the sort of thing keepers get away with. They’ve jumped with their feet raised for years which a centre back would get penalised for

 

[Carlton Blade]

Dangerous? Understatement I think. It’s only inches from his eye. When you look at the full video from tv he deliberately raised his foot. Was he in control?

How was 'dangerous' an understatement? What else should I have said?

 

[MKY]

Keeper knew exactly what he was doing.

 

[Blade56]

Here’s photo. It’s from Danny halls face book page.
View attachment 229705


See below. Managed to get photo. It’s from Danny Halls Facebook and is on another post on here.

Ouch.

Time for keeper to raise a hand in apology but not enough time to put his foot down

 

[ChipButtyBlade]

Goalkeepers handbook....written by Harald Schumacher.........if you cant get the ball get the man.

 

[Blade&Snuff]

If this is not dangerous then what is.

 

[Bladesman]

If this is not dangerous then what is.

O'Hare's fault for putting his face there.

 

[ThirdGenBlade]

From the angle behind O'Hare after he scores, the keeper clearly 'does him'
There is a definite intention to boot him.
Cynical and dangerous and should be looked at as a retrospective red card.

You can see it clearly here at 3 mins 42 secs

All of the chat about intent, low head, and keepers is a load of bollocks.

A keeper is a player. He went into a tackle, out of control, with his studs first about 2 feet above the ground, missed the ball and hit the player.

Straight red card anywhere on the pitch.

Referee is a twat, who should be disciplined, and keeper should get a retrospective ban or the game is as corrupt as that ref.

Got us all going though, which probably won us the match!

UTB & FTP!

 

[programmechap]

All of the chat about intent, low head, and keepers is a load of bollocks.

A keeper is a player. He went into a tackle, out of control, with his studs first about 2 feet above the ground, missed the ball and hit the player.

Straight red card anywhere on the pitch.

Referee is a twat, who should be disciplined, and keeper should get a retrospective ban or the game is as corrupt as that ref.

Got us all going though, which probably won us the match!

UTB & FTP!

I agree. Intention is irrelevant. Its a dangerously out of control challenge.

 

[Bladesman]

All of the chat about intent, low head, and keepers is a load of bollocks.

A keeper is a player. He went into a tackle, out of control, with his studs first about 2 feet above the ground, missed the ball and hit the player.

Straight red card anywhere on the pitch.

Referee is a twat, who should be disciplined, and keeper should get a retrospective ban or the game is as corrupt as that ref.

Got us all going though, which probably won us the match!

UTB & FTP!

Their keeper can get a retrospective ban for it.

 

[Blademan89]

Their keeper can get a retrospective ban for it.

But he wont do though.

 

[ml1997]

To me it just seems like a simple mistake from the keeper and not intentional at all. We won the game, O’Hare’s fine. Let’s move on.

 

[mattbianco1]

If it had rolled wide, do we think we'd have got a penalty? Not a chance.

He was booked for pushing Peck, not the kick.