Yogi
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2019
- Messages
- 8,705
- Reaction score
- 12,399
Without diving into a detailed breakdown of Cat one academies vs Cat two in terms of production because it would take ages I’d suggest we perform like a good category two academy on that front.Surely the ultimate gauge of quality is the output and the careers academy players ultimately end up having. You’ve got a floodlight pitch; so what? It’s easier to poach talent; well what careers are these players having?
I see it a bit like the state/public school system. Public schools generally have better facilities, better teachers and more opportunities for their pupils who in turn are more likely to succeed as a result of this. BUT, there’s plenty of state schools out there are producing far more intelligent and rounded students than many public schools are.
Given United’s reputation and list of players who’ve gone on to have successful careers (plus the fact that many of them seem to be taught to have a mature mindset), I see us as that state school that’s punching well above its weight. There’s undoubtedly some Cat A academies that haven’t and aren’t producing the quality we are, despite it theoretically being easier to do so.
That said, I’d love us to get Cat A. If the academy can work so well without it, having that status should really ramp things up.
The big prestigious Cat one (Man U, Man City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Liverpool, Spurs, Everton) academies definitely out do us in terms of production and the average level those players play their careers at. The league system is littered with players who have come through at those clubs at all levels.
I’d then argue that the newer well run category one academies are also out producing us at this moment even if they’ve not traditionally had a better set up than us they do now. I’d have Norwich, Brighton and Leicester in this category off the top of my head.
There’s also the cat two academies who were very similar to us who’ve recently gone cat one (Leeds and Birmingham) who will now kick on having attained the higher categorisation.
That said our creative academy recruitment and good record of player development means we are competitive with a lot of category one academies and certainly out perform some such as Newcastle.
United’s youngsters mainly go into none league or leave the game behind. There’s a sprinkling of them throughout the league system but not that many really. What we seem to do well is produce a high percentage of top top level footballers but not the mid level ones to go alongside.
The frustration is we can only speculate as to how much more effective the academy would be be without the inherent disadvantages that come with being Cat two. If the aim is as the prince has stated in the past for the academy to support the first team then it will have to be more consistent in its output and that will require Cat one status to better allow us to retain and develop players. We can’t be having 4/5 year gaps between producing first team caliber players.