Still seething about Friday's performance and current events

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Kempy

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2010
Messages
406
Reaction score
450
Location
Leeds
Just (I say this lightly reading back over it) my opinion on Friday's game and a few other problems as I can still not get the sour taste out of my mouth nor the annoyance at the shite on display for a near 20 quid ticket.

Blades:

Where to fecking start, that first half was the worst performance I have ever seen in my entire life. It reminded me of my sunday league's Friday night training sessions Attack Vs Defence, it was nothing short of embarrassing.

- 1st Major pissed off point: DON'T EVER start with Porter and Kitson upfront, I walked into the ground on Friday with a good mate of mine to look at the first tv screen available for the team line-ups. The first few words that came out of my mouth: " Well we're fecked". Porter simply put is not good enough, there is simply no return for the lad. I understand his role of play, I am not expecting him to blast past players with pace and slam a shot into the bottom corner. However I do expect a few things from a big lad upfront. 1. Movement (non-existent) 2. Effort ( this is the only thing Porter has of which he seems to switch on and off like a girl making their mind up) 3. To actually attack a ball played up to him (doesn't happen and when it does its not as effective as when Kitson or Cressy do) 4. Score some goals (I don't need to explain this, and please don't comment oh well he got the winner against Stevenage because he did bugger all else in that game)

Defence: Jesus we look better with Collins at the back but that really does show how far we have dropped that Collins is indeed a Lynchpin of our team.

-2nd Major pissed off point: How badly Higgo played at LB on Friday which I don't think many have mentioned on here? I did not see him play one ball to feet, everything he hit was up in the air and did not find a man once. He was awful and was outpaced and skinned many a time. Easily the worst play on the pitch if not for one challenge he made near the end of the game saving us further embarrassment of conceding another. I cannot wait for LJF to come back in as we have no Lb's in this squad apart from him who are ok (LJF is prone to at least 1 ricket a game) but at least he gets forward, is strong, has a decent delivery and has PACE. Major difference between us last year and this year is how our fullbacks do not get forward. We miss this so much and slows our build up and attacking momentum unbelievably!

George Long- Some of you will disagree with this: The lad has done brilliantly however the right decision as soon as Howard is fit, is to put him back in the net. Since Christmas IMO there has been a drop in form from George. Many goals over the last month or so cannot solely be attributed to faults by George (apart from the obvious mistake pissing around with it) but there have been a lot that have gone in that I would have expected him or another keeper of League 1 standard to save. Perfect example was Cov's 2nd goal on Friday, although hit with pace was very poorly palmed out to the bell end Leon Clarke. (Kitson was the main fault for that goal)

Midfield- MAIN PISSED OFF POINT: NON-EXISTENT:There were times where Cov played 5 in the middle, however this is no excuse for the complete lack of any heart or effort from our two CM's. K mac will never be a player who will exert any effort than the minimal possible; in short he is a complete puff when any chance of getting mud on his shirt arises. He was a ghost for the 1st half however I put this down to lack of options which was clearly proven true as when Forte came on. Within minutes of Forte coming on making runs and dragging defenders to open up space for the wide men K mac played 2 cracking balls, one to Forte who was unlucky with the chance and a great 25 yard cross field ball to Flynn. It is obvious he has the best passing ability in this league but can do bugger all else. Put decent players around him and we will reap the benefits all day long.

Doyle: Please get dropped, Worst player on the pitch, I saw him the grand total of 3 times on Friday: all 3 of which he lost the ball stupidly in a dangerous area. He did not win anything and looked totally void of any knowledge. We needed a Cm in that transfer window to put pressure on them. We need an athletic ball winning box to box midfielder, with pace and strength. We may as well have no midfield against teams like Coventry with a bit of pace and strength.

Stop slagging Flynn off: annoyed with the morons who slag him off on this site. Flynn is one of our hardest working players who tries to get a cross in every time. Put him up against a decent pacey RB (i.e. Christie for cov) and he will struggle. However he beat him a few times down the wing and had much more luck when swapped with Murphy who was just god damn awful on Friday. Flynn works his bollocks off and has no overlapping help from Mcmahon or Higgo/Williams. If it weren’t for Flynn we would have conceded many more goals this season and not scored as many either. We know he is not good enough for the championship , neither is half our squad but he is for sure easily good enough for the majority of teams in this league. Murphy was awful and rightfully subbed, has the pace to get past people but no heart to continue and gives up if any player lays a finger on him, I'am hoping for a lot more from him.

- Robson: Quality delivery for the corner, looks a class act void of match fitness and needs to gel with the team, I really think he will turn out to be a good player especially at this level and am praying every night he replaces an awful Doyle in the middle of the park. Robson had some skills, a nice quick turn, great delivery (although his other corners was shocking) and looks like he has some bollocks ordering players around into the right positions he has only met 2 days ago. - 1 of the only positives.

-Attack:

Porter= crap

Kitson= worked hard put himself about, great header. Does what porter should be doing but better than porter could ever do. Needs a pacey striker alongside (Miller, Forte)

Forte: I was very impressed and need to retract my comments made on the original threads saying we had signed him. Movement was excellent, tried to get a shot off when possible, a nice few skills. Looks a million miles better then when we originally had him (again shows how far we have dropped) He will relish K mac putting balls through to them but in order to reap the best we need to replace Doyle with someone who can win the ball and is quicker and smarter, our best option being Robson.

- Summary from essay and general points of annoyance:

We are stuffed, there is no two ways about it. Play-offs? (notice I am not even considering auto) my arse, we were made to look a pub team by a distinctly average Coventry City. There are far better, hungry teams playing in this division then us. Stupid mistakes and distinctly low effort rates litter our team to produce bugger all but a late surge 30 mins before the end when we realise the team we are playing is actually just as shit as us. This is not good enough. The only things differing; that they had PACE and my god do we need that in more departments then we currently have, every performance screams out how much we lack pace echoed by our ability to build up an attacking threat at the pace of a slug. Also how much more they wanted it, we looked void of any interest untill it was too late. Robson looked the most passionate after his first touch on the pitch.... that really says something.

^ this was an essay and only covers maybe if I am lucky 1/3 of the crap on display on Friday. However who should we blame?

-McCabe = I think yes, of course we should, his poor management of the club has sat us in this shit, compounded by the disappearance of the most recent Blackman funds. Can he solely be blamed? No, you would be stupid to think so, how can he be blamed for shite performances of players? Managers who do not live up to expectations? How better off do you honestly think we would be without him?

- Wilson = Yes , the man is a poor motivator and a poor tactician. However he did wonders last year and was very unlucky, brought the best out of what was looking to be a shite 3m pound player, does seem to get in some decent players and helps to keep hold of some of our best i.e. K mac.

- Players= Yes, they are poor in a poor league. They should have more heart and try breaking a swet more often. They are also paid more than most other clubs in the league without at this time giving much of a return. However we all know they are better than they are playing right now and continually slagging them off isn't going to help.

I guess what I am trying to do is give those of you who didn’t go on Friday an image of how poor we were, while contradicting myself on who to blame as my annoyance levels just keep rising and rising with how poor we have been (lets be honest for most of the season) week on week. I think in sum up we really are wading deeper and deeper into deep shit and we really need an answer sharpish.

Change Doyle for Robson and give him captaincy, give Murphy a kick up the arse along with K mac to stop being such puffs and start with this squad as soon as possible and just maybe something might happen. ( Highly Unlikely):

Howard

LJF, Harry, Collins, McMahon

Flynn, Macca, Robson, Murphy

Forte, Kitson

>I know there is more to it but you could write a fecking book on the problems and still get nowhere near covering how poor we are at the moment.



 



I feel for you mate if it still ranckles.
I've trained the mind and body to get over such performances before I'm back at my car. Years of disappointments have numbed me into such a state of mind.
Lots more in life to get upset about than 11 blokes who you've probably never met dictating your state of mind.

Mind you - I'm having some more of the fucker on Tuesday :rolleyes:
 
We are stuffed, there is no two ways about it. Play-offs? (notice I am not even considering auto) my arse, we were made to look a pub team by a distinctly average Coventry City.

Great post Kempy but you could have summed it up with the above. We're a pub side in a pub league and we're skint. We don't have any decent youngsters coming through, we don't have the cash or the clout to attract anything half decent so the bottom line is, as you so succintly put it, we're stuffed.

Going to the Lane now is more about duty than anything else. If you feel it's your duty to be there then go, otherwise just let them rot and wallow in the good old days because they will never be back. The game's changed, the club's changed beyond all recognition and the days of "We're all Blades in here aren't we" have sadly gone because there is no "Blades" anymore, just a cheap imitation of a once proud and passionate club. Thanks Kev, great job Superblade ;)
 
Great post Kempy but you could have summed it up with the above. We're a pub side in a pub league and we're skint. We don't have any decent youngsters coming through, we don't have the cash or the clout to attract anything half decent so the bottom line is, as you so succintly put it, we're stuffed.

Going to the Lane now is more about duty than anything else. If you feel it's your duty to be there then go, otherwise just let them rot and wallow in the good old days because they will never be back. The game's changed, the club's changed beyond all recognition and the days of "We're all Blades in here aren't we" have sadly gone because there is no "Blades" anymore, just a cheap imitation of a once proud and passionate club. Thanks Kev, great job Superblade ;)

Can't argue with anything you've said there mate
 
I was able to get over it better noticing everyone around us fucked up as well. (bar bournemouth)
 
i have no idea why people even look at teams above us. thats of no concern to us. right now were worse than everybody in the league apart from the bottom 6 or 7 teams. if we suddenly look like winning games again, maybe look at the top 6 again. until that happens its not even worth thinking about.
 
Kempy, very good post mate and i'm in agreement with you for a large part of it. Most who post on here are as frustrated with the club, the management and of course, the players themselves.
After the events of last season, I thought that we would kick on and be serious contenders to win the league this year, despite the disappointment of losing Evans, the Wembley debacle and the loss of a few key players.
However, i'm starting to have deep concerns that we wont even make the top six now, especially after that first half on friday night. It was an appalling performance and thinking back, it's been a regular occurance this season, but most of the time we've managed to salvage a point or scrape the win.
It's also disturbing to see how many teams want it more when they play us (last friday night and Brentford away springs to mind) and personally, I think some of our players should take a long hard look at themselves over their perfomances in recent weeks as it appears that once we got to the top of the league at christmas, they thought it was job done.
I cant be there on tuesday evening but I sincerely hope that some lessons were learned from the Coventry game. If we turn in a similar performance and end up with another home defeat, I genuinely think that it will turn nasty.
:(
 
That won't happen every week though mate!

Oh true I know that was a let off but I just see it as small bit of luck. We cannot expect that every week but it was surprising though.
 
porter really is bloody dire. why the hell didnt we get rid him? why did we even give him a new contract. im fed up mccabe bashing now, but yet another example of the chuckle brothers in charge not having a clue what theyre doing. we should have got rid in the summer and signed a proper replacement. oh wait, we did. but we just sold him.
 
-2nd Major pissed off point: How badly Higgo played at LB on Friday which I don't think many have mentioned on here? I did not see him play one ball to feet, everything he hit was up in the air and did not find a man once. He was awful and was outpaced and skinned many a time. Easily the worst play on the pitch if not for one challenge he made near the end of the game saving us further embarrassment of conceding another. I cannot wait for LJF to come back in as we have no Lb's in this squad apart from him who are ok (LJF is prone to at least 1 ricket a game) but at least he gets forward, is strong, has a decent delivery and has PACE. Major difference between us last year and this year is how our fullbacks do not get forward. We miss this so much and slows our build up and attacking momentum unbelievably!


Howard

LJF, Harry, Collins, McMahon

Flynn, Macca, Robson, Murphy

Forte, Kitson

Agree with most of what you say but LJF seems to have improved in some fans' eyes during his absence. He is a car crash of a defender and is a league one version of Nosworthy.Prone to 1 ricket every 10 minutes,poor positionally and his crossin is awful

Hill is by far the best left back at the club and the sooner he is back and Higinbotham moved to the middle to replace/rest Maguire,the better
 
howard

higginbum collins maguire

robson
flynn whitehouse mcdonald murphy

diego
forte

call me crazy! :eek:
 



Agree with a lot of the above, not everything. Some random thoughts:

* Both target men won it quite a lot in the air, but there was no movement around them, and Kitson and Porter can't be expected to run onto flick ons, etc. It is not what they do. They both play with backs to goal, wins flick ons and tries to hold it up. They both did this first half, and in that sense people are a bit harsh on Porter. He made some technical mistakes that stood out, like when they scored their first. I saw all those, but the target man stuff, he did ok, and it may have been worth something if there had been some sort of plan for what was going to happen after a high ball had been won.

* When we had two so slow strikers, it enabled Coventry to defend high up the pitch, knowing that there was no threat to run in behind. They closed down our defenders very high up as well, which meant they resorted to hitting long balls up to Kitson/Porter, who often won it, but with nobody trying to run onto the flicks, Coventry just picked up the ball and started a new attack. It is not fair on the players to expect them to perform when such a poorly balanced attack is put out and the management must accept the majority of blame for how the game turned out for us.

* Murphy will do well for us eventually. He was given the task of being our only outlet, and struggled with the task. He tried a few times to get past his full back, but was unlucky with his touch a few times, and I think it knocked his confidence. Wingers are often confidence players, and unsuccessful dribbles will make it more difficult to get it right the next time as well. Given time and a better balanced side he will come good. If we put a centre half behind him, two target men in front of him and a slow wideman on the other side, he will regret he came here.

* Flynn's fans often have a go at those who dare criticising him. I agree that he can do a job in this division, provided that other players do a lot of the things he just won't offer. From an attacking point of view he hardly did anything first half. Second half he was more involved, showed some decent touches a couple of times and tried to run at the defence after making interceptions. I noted four decent (attempted) runs from him, but none of them resulted in anything (he was stopped; won a free kick; passed it sideways; passed to an offside Robson). Can anyone remember one good cross from him on Friday? When?

* Agree with Kempy on Higginbotham, very poor at left back, looked out of position, and his crossing was particularly poor. McMahon also had a poorish game, took him an hour before he made a decent overlapping run.
 
Christ !!! What a compelling but depressing thread. I went to the Yeovil and Notts County games but missed last Friday, sounds like I missed a treat. Were we really top of the division at Xmas ?

As others have commented, it's more out of faith and duty than expectation these days and it's sad and difficult to accept that our "glory years" are well behind us. No real opinions about McCabe but having seen him interviewed on tv surrounded by family in his Mayfair London flat before the play-off final against Hudders you start to think it's just about ego and being able to announce that you're Chairman of a professional football club in company of other wealthy types. Saw him again when he announced the Jess Ennis stand (sheesh) and if that's an example of his acumen then perhaps we need to drop to the bottom division on 8,000 attendances if it's a way of eventually forcing him out.

Wilson doesn't seem to have a clue
 
Agree with a lot of the above, not everything. Some random thoughts:

* Both target men won it quite a lot in the air, but there was no movement around them, and Kitson and Porter can't be expected to run onto flick ons, etc. It is not what they do. They both play with backs to goal, wins flick ons and tries to hold it up. They both did this first half, and in that sense people are a bit harsh on Porter. He made some technical mistakes that stood out, like when they scored their first. I saw all those, but the target man stuff, he did ok, and it may have been worth something if there had been some sort of plan for what was going to happen after a high ball had been won.

* When we had two so slow strikers, it enabled Coventry to defend high up the pitch, knowing that there was no threat to run in behind. They closed down our defenders very high up as well, which meant they resorted to hitting long balls up to Kitson/Porter, who often won it, but with nobody trying to run onto the flicks, Coventry just picked up the ball and started a new attack. It is not fair on the players to expect them to perform when such a poorly balanced attack is put out and the management must accept the majority of blame for how the game turned out for us.

* Murphy will do well for us eventually. He was given the task of being our only outlet, and struggled with the task. He tried a few times to get past his full back, but was unlucky with his touch a few times, and I think it knocked his confidence. Wingers are often confidence players, and unsuccessful dribbles will make it more difficult to get it right the next time as well. Given time and a better balanced side he will come good. If we put a centre half behind him, two target men in front of him and a slow wideman on the other side, he will regret he came here.

* Flynn's fans often have a go at those who dare criticising him. I agree that he can do a job in this division, provided that other players do a lot of the things he just won't offer. From an attacking point of view he hardly did anything first half. Second half he was more involved, showed some decent touches a couple of times and tried to run at the defence after making interceptions. I noted four decent (attempted) runs from him, but none of them resulted in anything (he was stopped; won a free kick; passed it sideways; passed to an offside Robson). Can anyone remember one good cross from him on Friday? When?

* Agree with Kempy on Higginbotham, very poor at left back, looked out of position, and his crossing was particularly poor. McMahon also had a poorish game, took him an hour before he made a decent overlapping run.


I agree with a lot of that BB but still have to disagree with a few points. You are right, porter and Kitson if they are going to play need a pacey player to play off them. However I feel Kitson and Cressy do Porter's role better than he does and seem to have better fitness which is ridiculous considering their age in comparison to Porter's.

I also agree that Murphy is a good player and have no doubts he will become a good player for us, however I disagree with your points on Flynn. In comparison on Friday Flynn did alot more than Murphy. You criticise Flynn's attacking side yet he tried to take on his man more times than Murphy did? Flynn also was successful more times and did not give up when he lost the ball as Murphy pushed the ball passed his fb on a few occasions and just gave up as soon as he was challenged? Flynn was also up against a better full back (Christie) than Murphy was. I know they both swapped wings but if you look back on the highlights you will see Flynn played the majority against Christie. I agree his final product wasn't their but he won a free kick, kept possession and his defensive tracking back was far better than that of Murphy. The only thing of note I can recall Murphy doing is blasting the ball halfway up to Kop when he had a great position to clip it to the back post for Kitson to nod in.....

Fact is we didn't have any luck down the wings on Friday untill Robson with a bit of experience came onto the pitch and Forte made runs to open some more space up. Both Flynn and Murphy are easily good enough for this league and I just think Flynn seems to get bashing for unfair reason considering he has one of the highest if not the highest assist rate in our squad?

 
Great post Kempy but you could have summed it up with the above. We're a pub side in a pub league and we're skint. We don't have any decent youngsters coming through, we don't have the cash or the clout to attract anything half decent so the bottom line is, as you so succintly put it, we're stuffed.

Going to the Lane now is more about duty than anything else. If you feel it's your duty to be there then go, otherwise just let them rot and wallow in the good old days because they will never be back. The game's changed, the club's changed beyond all recognition and the days of "We're all Blades in here aren't we" have sadly gone because there is no "Blades" anymore, just a cheap imitation of a once proud and passionate club. Thanks Kev, great job Superblade ;)

Great stuff - pleasure to read it.
 
Agree with a lot of the above, not everything. Some random thoughts:

* Both target men won it quite a lot in the air, but there was no movement around them, and Kitson and Porter can't be expected to run onto flick ons, etc. It is not what they do. They both play with backs to goal, wins flick ons and tries to hold it up. They both did this first half, and in that sense people are a bit harsh on Porter. He made some technical mistakes that stood out, like when they scored their first. I saw all those, but the target man stuff, he did ok, and it may have been worth something if there had been some sort of plan for what was going to happen after a high ball had been won.

* When we had two so slow strikers, it enabled Coventry to defend high up the pitch, knowing that there was no threat to run in behind. They closed down our defenders very high up as well, which meant they resorted to hitting long balls up to Kitson/Porter, who often won it, but with nobody trying to run onto the flicks, Coventry just picked up the ball and started a new attack. It is not fair on the players to expect them to perform when such a poorly balanced attack is put out and the management must accept the majority of blame for how the game turned out for us.

* Murphy will do well for us eventually. He was given the task of being our only outlet, and struggled with the task. He tried a few times to get past his full back, but was unlucky with his touch a few times, and I think it knocked his confidence. Wingers are often confidence players, and unsuccessful dribbles will make it more difficult to get it right the next time as well. Given time and a better balanced side he will come good. If we put a centre half behind him, two target men in front of him and a slow wideman on the other side, he will regret he came here.

* Flynn's fans often have a go at those who dare criticising him. I agree that he can do a job in this division, provided that other players do a lot of the things he just won't offer. From an attacking point of view he hardly did anything first half. Second half he was more involved, showed some decent touches a couple of times and tried to run at the defence after making interceptions. I noted four decent (attempted) runs from him, but none of them resulted in anything (he was stopped; won a free kick; passed it sideways; passed to an offside Robson). Can anyone remember one good cross from him on Friday? When?

* Agree with Kempy on Higginbotham, very poor at left back, looked out of position, and his crossing was particularly poor. McMahon also had a poorish game, took him an hour before he made a decent overlapping run.
Agree with a lot of the above, not everything. Some random thoughts:

* Both target men won it quite a lot in the air, but there was no movement around them, and Kitson and Porter can't be expected to run onto flick ons, etc. It is not what they do. They both play with backs to goal, wins flick ons and tries to hold it up. They both did this first half, and in that sense people are a bit harsh on Porter. He made some technical mistakes that stood out, like when they scored their first. I saw all those, but the target man stuff, he did ok, and it may have been worth something if there had been some sort of plan for what was going to happen after a high ball had been won.

* When we had two so slow strikers, it enabled Coventry to defend high up the pitch, knowing that there was no threat to run in behind. They closed down our defenders very high up as well, which meant they resorted to hitting long balls up to Kitson/Porter, who often won it, but with nobody trying to run onto the flicks, Coventry just picked up the ball and started a new attack. It is not fair on the players to expect them to perform when such a poorly balanced attack is put out and the management must accept the majority of blame for how the game turned out for us.

* Murphy will do well for us eventually. He was given the task of being our only outlet, and struggled with the task. He tried a few times to get past his full back, but was unlucky with his touch a few times, and I think it knocked his confidence. Wingers are often confidence players, and unsuccessful dribbles will make it more difficult to get it right the next time as well. Given time and a better balanced side he will come good. If we put a centre half behind him, two target men in front of him and a slow wideman on the other side, he will regret he came here.

* Flynn's fans often have a go at those who dare criticising him. I agree that he can do a job in this division, provided that other players do a lot of the things he just won't offer. From an attacking point of view he hardly did anything first half. Second half he was more involved, showed some decent touches a couple of times and tried to run at the defence after making interceptions. I noted four decent (attempted) runs from him, but none of them resulted in anything (he was stopped; won a free kick; passed it sideways; passed to an offside Robson). Can anyone remember one good cross from him on Friday? When?

* Agree with Kempy on Higginbotham, very poor at left back, looked out of position, and his crossing was particularly poor. McMahon also had a poorish game, took him an hour before he made a decent overlapping run.

Quite surprised about your Murphy comments. Yes, the team clearly could have better balance but he just looks a really weak player to me. This is L1 and irrespective of the team around him he should be creating far more moments of danger in the opposition half. Early days for him, and service to him poor but I just saw a poor headless chicken in him - not a good player trying to get out, certainly not a player who will be part of a L1 promotion side. Coventry must have had 4 or 5 players who were all more mobile, stronger and simplye better than Murphy - our supposed quick and tricky wideman.
 
Quite surprised about your Murphy comments. Yes, the team clearly could have better balance but he just looks a really weak player to me. This is L1 and irrespective of the team around him he should be creating far more moments of danger in the opposition half. Early days for him, and service to him poor but I just saw a poor headless chicken in him - not a good player trying to get out, certainly not a player who will be part of a L1 promotion side. Coventry must have had 4 or 5 players who were all more mobile, stronger and simplye better than Murphy - our supposed quick and tricky wideman.

Murphy reminds of McAllister in some regards. He looks like a player who has been playing at a shocking level of football with poor coaching and is finding the step up difficult.

The difference with Murphy is has some obvious attributes which McAllister didn't.

One thing that stood out for me is that he always seems to be waiting for a defender to make a challenge, rather than just get his head down and use his pace, he seems like he's waiting to be tackled.
 
If I took the manager's job tomorrow I would drop McDonald and Doyle to the bench. Nobody should be certain of a place regardless of form. I would go with this:-

Long
McMahon Maguire Collins Higginbotham
Flynn Robson Whitehouse Murphy
Forte Kitson

Subs:- Coyne, Westlake, Doyle, McDonald, De Girolamo, Ironside, Porter

Time to get tough with certain individuals and give them a bit of a kick up the arse, starting with the two in the middle who can play a lot better than they are doing!
 
I think that would a better balance in midfield

Possibly. I just think at the moment we can't afford passengers (most teams can't at the best of times) and some of our senior players are letting the game pass them by. To me, Robson and Whitehouse can do no worse. If a bit of serious competition brings the best out of KMac and Doyle then that's what needs to be done.
 
I see Keith Curle has been given the tin tack for latest string of perfomances.
If we fail to do the business vs Creepy on Tuesday night there will have to be some serious questions being asked because if you look at what Mark Robins has done at Coventry and what Eddie Howe has achieved at Bournemouth the comparison is stark to say the least
 
Quite surprised about your Murphy comments. Yes, the team clearly could have better balance but he just looks a really weak player to me.

Or could it be that United's 'style' (both current and pre-DW) makes a lot of players seem poor?

I'm not going through the old 'but why didn't he do it for us?' debate, but week after week, ex-United players continue to shine. Jamie Ward, Cotterill, Britton, Dyer, Sharp etc. They are often accused of being 'lazy' etc. Could it be the absolute dearth of tactics at the Lane drag players down?
 
I see Keith Curle has been given the tin tack for latest string of perfomances.
If we fail to do the business vs Creepy on Tuesday night there will have to be some serious questions being asked because if you look at what Mark Robins has done at Coventry and what Eddie Howe has achieved at Bournemouth the comparison is stark to say the least

This is why people want DW out not cus he's from the dark side.

I've only seen them 7 times under DW but everytime has been crap.

My son follows them home and away and he says I'm a jinx but I can only call what I see - he says I've seen the 7 worse performances.

Flynn has been the best player I've seen so god help us.
 
I'm not stating that I want DW out but if he cannot make the obvious, tough decisions and drop those that are not performing then there will be no improvement. Who's the boss?

At half time Friday night he should have made three changes as a statement to the effect that the first 45 mins performance was totally unacceptable. To leave it another 15 mins was scandalous and is telling the players that he is a soft touch.

Can you imagine the shit storm at Swindon if those standards were on display - in a home game?
 
I'm not stating that I want DW out but if he cannot make the obvious, tough decisions and drop those that are not performing then there will be no improvement. Who's the boss?

At half time Friday night he should have made three changes as a statement to the effect that the first 45 mins performance was totally unacceptable. To leave it another 15 mins was scandalous and is telling the players that he is a soft touch.

Can you imagine the shit storm at Swindon if those standards were on display - in a home game?

Well you can see his reaction to selling Ritche... compared to that of Blackman, similar kind of players IMO.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom