Squad Depth - Who Would Win?

[Superbladesman7]

Yes it's the international break and I'm also procrastinating from exam revision. Our squad depth nowadays is looking very good, just thought I'd make up two mixed 11's, who would win or who would you prefer?

Team A:
Henderson
Baldock Bash Wright Egan Johnson
Lundstram Coutts
Woodburn
Sharp Washington


Team B:
Moore
Freeman Cranie Stearman O'Connell Stevens
Norwood
Fleck Duffy
Clarke McGoldrick


Again just tried to mix it up as far as possible but shows how far we have come that in worst case scenarios I wouldn't be concerned if we had either of those line ups. 2 Very decent 11's.

Gonna go for team B to win this one, they are all heroes but Fleck is my favorite player in a very long time, probably soon to be challenged by Norwood!

 

[I should coco]

Yes it's the international break and I'm also procrastinating from exam revision. Our squad depth nowadays is looking very good, just thought I'd make up two mixed 11's, who would win or who would you prefer?

I think we'd prefer it if you got on with your studying.

Your parents are always right you know and you're not too old for thick ear.....

 

[Blade for Sale]

Yes it's the international break and I'm also procrastinating from exam revision. Our squad depth nowadays is looking very good, just thought I'd make up two mixed 11's, who would win or who would you prefer?

Team A:
Henderson
Baldock Bash Wright Egan Johnson
Lundstram Coutts
Woodburn
Sharp Washington


Team B:
Moore
Freeman Cranie Stearman O'Connell Stevens
Norwood
Fleck Duffy
Clarke McGoldrick


Again just tried to mix it up as far as possible but shows how far we have come that in worst case scenarios I wouldn't be concerned if we had either of those line ups. 2 Very decent 11's.

Gonna go for team B to win this one, they are all heroes but Fleck is my favorite player in a very long time, probably soon to be challenged by Norwood!

B hands down for me. Norwood, Fleck, Duffy and McGoldrick are 4 of the cleverest players I've seen in a long time. You've also got the better full backs. Team B 3-1 Team A.

 

[Plymouthblade]

 

[Superbladesman7]

I think we'd prefer it if you got on with your studying.

Your parents are always right you know and you're not too old for thick ear.....

Ha, unfortunately accounting exams aren't too much of a thrill!

 

[I should coco]

Ha, unfortunately accounting exams aren't too much of a thrill!

No they are bloody hard work, so get your nose down for those PE1s.

 

[Superbladesman7]

No they are bloody hard work, so get your nose down for those PE1s.

Thanks Dad!

 

[PeterNdlovu081]

The teams aren't very balanced.

Team B looks much stronger.

 

[HodgysBrokenThumb]

Ha, unfortunately accounting exams aren't too much of a thrill!

But just think - you'll be able to explain SUFC's accounts to us every year, and most of us won't have a clue whether you're right or wrong...

 

[FTPE]

You've mixed it up well, but the answer is always going to be the team thay Duffy, Fleck and Norwood is in.
If all 3 are in the same one... it's a no brainer.

 

[COME BACK CHED]

Team A 2 v 0 Sharp 2

 

[Fulwood Blade]

B hands down for me. Norwood, Fleck, Duffy and McGoldrick are 4 of the cleverest players I've seen in a long time. You've also got the better full backs. Team B 3-1 Team A.

yep - clever, intelligent, use the ball well - pinchy will be WELL pleased - not a hoof in sight !!

UTB

 

[Sean Thornton]

Fucking students.......

 

[snootyfenooty]

Team A 2 v 0 Sharp 2

Could you type that again in morse code for easier understanding.

 

[Fulwood Blade]

Yes it's the international break and I'm also procrastinating from exam revision. Our squad depth nowadays is looking very good, just thought I'd make up two mixed 11's, who would win or who would you prefer?

Team A:
Henderson
Baldock Bash Wright Egan Johnson
Lundstram Coutts
Woodburn
Sharp Washington


Team B:
Moore
Freeman Cranie Stearman O'Connell Stevens
Norwood
Fleck Duffy
Clarke McGoldrick


Again just tried to mix it up as far as possible but shows how far we have come that in worst case scenarios I wouldn't be concerned if we had either of those line ups. 2 Very decent 11's.

Gonna go for team B to win this one, they are all heroes but Fleck is my favorite player in a very long time, probably soon to be challenged by Norwood!

Look here you bloody snowflake - get your head down

as for the teams - as some others (not all) Fleck/Norwood/Duffy, it's a no brainer

UTB

 

[Sean Thornton]

No they are bloody hard work, so get your nose down for those PE1s.

Another one lazing his way to eventually taking food out of my kids mouths.

THERES ENOUGH OF US ALREADY!!!!

 

[Harrisblade]

But just think - you'll be able to explain SUFC's accounts to us every year, and most of us won't have a clue whether you're right or wrong...

Sean already does that for us - and most of us still argue like fuck about whether McCabes pocketed all the money or not

 

[COME BACK CHED]

Could you type that again in morse code for easier understanding.

No

 

[I should coco]

THERES ENOUGH OF US ALREADY!!!!

In a rush this morning Sean Thornton?

Looks like you dashed out without a raincoat and an apostrophe.

You know well the first rule of punctuation: "Four exclamation marks, do not an apostrophe make"

Tut tut.

 

[1danewhitehouse]

We gaha 4 exceptional midfielders who are pivotal to how we play (3 to play at any one time). You have put 3 of them in one team and 1 in the other this making team b stronger. If you want it more even you'd have to swap Fleck and Lundstram or Duffy with Woodburn.

 

[Sean Thornton]

In a rush this morning Sean Thornton?

Looks like you dashed out without a raincoat and an apostrophe.

You know well the first rule of punctuation: "Four exclamation marks, do not an apostrophe make"

Tut tut.

I was shouting, always a reason for grammar flying out of the window and spittle flying onto the screen.

Like you with those intimate pictures of donkeys.

 

[leichhardtblade]

In a rush this morning Sean Thornton?

Looks like you dashed out without a raincoat and an apostrophe.

You know well the first rule of punctuation: "Four exclamation marks, do not an apostrophe make"

Tut tut.

If we're picking, it's "There are enough....." #metoo

 

[1danewhitehouse]

We gaha 4 exceptional midfielders who are pivotal to how we play (3 to play at any one time). You have put 3 of them in one team and 1 in the other this making team b stronger. If you want it more even you'd have to swap Fleck and Lundstram or Duffy with Woodburn.

"have" not "gaha". Stupid fucking phone.

 

[Sean Thornton]

If we're picking, it's "There are enough....." #metoo

Lar di dar Grammar Graham.......

 

[leichhardtblade]

Lar di dar Grammar Graham.......

I wasn't nitpicking your post by the way. I just pick on the pickers.

 

[I should coco]

If we're picking, it's "There are enough....." #metoo

Good point and if I may say so, very well made.

I was shouting, always a reason for grammar flying out of the window and spittle flying onto the screen.

The last refuge of the scoundrel.

Lar di dar Grammar Graham.......

Sean, dear Sean. You used to be such a nice boy before you started associating with these football ruffians.

Maybe you just aren't cut out for the rough and tumble of the modern internet world?

Ever tried stamp collecting?

 

[I should coco]

I wasn't nitpicking your post by the way. I just pick on the pickers

...and I put it to you sir, liar liar, your bum's on fire.

#arselicker-Blades

 

[leichhardtblade]

...and I put it to you sir, liar liar, your bum's on fire.

#arselicker-Blades

Did you just presume my gender?

 

[I should coco]

Did you just presume my gender?

I did.

I presume I have now mortally offended you as you are:

a-female
b-transgender
c-sexual orientation undecided
or
d- all of the above.

Please accept my deepest and most sincere apologies.

 

[Nick Jansky]

THERES ENOUGH OF US ALREADY!!!!

Agreed. Ditch accountancy for tax as soon as you can post qualification. You'll have a more interesting, better paid career, and certainly meet a far higher class of people