But it's alright for you to call me an entitled, spoilt brat? Makes sense.
I said in hindsight of course Brewster wasn't the right signing. Wasn't obvious at the time is my point. You've also just said in another post maybe it wasn't true about Osihmen so there's that.
I said there is always the potential that the Osihmen and David stuff was spin, but that David would have been more likely - and again, even without hindsight: if the choice was David or Brewster you take David. Better record at a higher level at the time.
I dont really care that they're embarrassing I care if they can't afford the club. If you dont understand how that makes sense its on you.
You literally said last week that the owners being embarrassing via their behaviour affects the club and their ability to sign players. Do you think that doesnt extend to CW as well? Or is it because you like him he's immune to that?
Im sure the "Bristol" fans weren't wanting their manager sacked for losing to us. Like I say just entitled and spoilt if you don't understand why he did a good job that season.
We did a good job up until Christmas, but still fucked up several times. Post Christmas, when it came to the important games and the run in, CW cost us tactically. He then cost us tactically in the final. Throughout the season, his behaviour (and the players behaviour which he sanctioned) got us numerous fines. His end goal was to get promoted, he failed because of his decisions and his tactics.
Erm i'd say that's very normal. I don't really understand why you're so worked up about his minutes in pre-season
Because you use PS to bed players in, give them a chance to make a name and put themselves in the managers thoughts for the squad. He hasn't given One that chance, or any of the AI lads, or Curits, or anyone that he didn't HAVE to use.
Did you explain this? Genuinely not sure what you are on about now
He would go after Brooks and Seriki over and over again post match. No matter what, he would be incredibly critical. He'd then drop one of them, bring them off the bench and complain. You tell me how that's development?
But ye mostly I think your arguments are nonsense. Just my opinion
Your opinion is wrong - there's actual, factual evidence that Wilder has declined and that recently he has been a tangible issue towards the team and its form/results, but we're supposed to ignore all that because he achieved for us?