So who do you believe

[Addison]

Both local rags no doubt fed information by club insiders. Bournemouth Echo say £11.5 million package for Brooks. Stir says £15 million package. Thats a hell of a difference and one Sam Gallagher between the two valuations.

http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/sp...15million-for-sheffield-uniteds-david-brooks/


https://www.thestar.co.uk/sport/foo...oks-to-afc-bournemouth-are-revealed-1-9225250

 

[Ricky]

Somewhere in between, inevitably.

 

[Balham]

I'd go with the higher valuation. There was a lot of noise about an eight figure enquiry being rebuffed in January so the £10m rising to £11.5m sounds like an opening gambit that we've pushed back on. £12m rising to £15m sounds like a decent second bid.

It'll be undisclosed, naturally.

 

[blademark]

One paper wants it to be higher, the other wants it to be lower. Ignore both until the facts are known

 

[Maidenhead]

Makes no difference.

Player wants to go, he goes.

Both clubs have to convince their fans it was a good deal but realistically the fee is decided by who will pay what.

I can't understand why people obsess over it. It's not like it's their own money.

 

[SouthEssexBlade]

The Star pandering to Blades fans?