Sign Dean Hammond permanently - yes or no?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Sign Hammond permanently?

  • Yes

    Votes: 24 9.6%
  • No

    Votes: 227 90.4%

  • Total voters
    251

Ricky

Banned
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
18,219
Reaction score
35,782
Let's see if he can do better than Edgar.

(I won't bother with the same thread for Sammon, because that's not even a proper question is it)
 



Absolutely no.
Forget any good stuff he has done/can do. He is a liability.
Sorry Hammo, but you aint got the legs for it any more.
 
Let's see if he can do better than Edgar.

(I won't bother with the same thread for Sammon, because that's not even a proper question is it)
I don't think there would be much difference between a Sammon and Hammond poll.
 
Absolutely, catagorically fucking not.

The biggest blunder we've made all season was signing this utterly useless pile of excrement. A more damaging move than having Sammon and Woolford combined.

Any rare attempt at positive movement on the pitch is snuffed out when this lumbering, haphazard cunt gets the ball. He should never, ever be allowed at this club again.
 
Don't care either way.

Surprised if Adkins is allowed to sign anyone at the moment.
 
Absolutely, catagorically fucking not.

The biggest blunder we've made all season was signing this utterly useless pile of excrement. A more damaging move than having Sammon and Woolford combined.

Any rare attempt at positive movement on the pitch is snuffed out when this lumbering, haphazard cunt gets the ball. He should never, ever be allowed at this club again.

Can we put you down as a maybe?
 
We always get some comedians on these polls. But to be fair, they're so, so funny.
 



I think the yes votes are explained by a combination of comedians and people forgetting what the acceptable standard is for a Sheffield United player.
 
Scariest thing about this thread is that if Adkins remains in charge and the board don't block it, Hammond will almost certainly be his first signing if the star article is anything to go buy.
 
I am struggling to to recall a midfielder in the red & white who was worse than hammond?......a couple on par,woolford for one,but any worse?,im thinkin.......
 
The yes vote is clear evidence At least one Wednesday fan has infiltrated this board.
That's the only explanation, even if Hanmond had an account on here he wouldn't vote yes!
 
Scariest thing about this thread is that if Adkins remains in charge and the board don't block it, Hammond will almost certainly be his first signing if the star article is anything to go buy.
He will be building a side around him ,a spine of Long-Edgar-Hammond-Sharp is a bit like mine ,OK at the top and fucked downwards
 
Scariest thing about this thread is that if Adkins remains in charge and the board don't block it, Hammond will almost certainly be his first signing if the star article is anything to go buy.

Hammomd has already agreed terms.
 



All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom