Silent Blade
Well-Known Member
Shit pen by Peck, and the close range header by Bamford
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?
Fair enough, but some of those shots that hit the bar (especially from the guy who scored for them) could have gone in on another day.Shit pen by Peck, and the close range header by Bamford
3 times actually!Do you turn the TV off when the game is in our half of the pitch or are we supposed to just ignore all their chances and them hitting the woodwork twice?
If we’re looking at what could have happened we could have lost 10-3
I must have missed one of them, just heard the commentary say the same player hit the woodwork twice but they didn’t mention another time3 times actually!
43 times actually!
Do you turn the TV off when the game is in our half of the pitch or are we supposed to just ignore all their chances and them hitting the woodwork twice?
If we’re looking at what could have happened we could have lost 10-3
Fair enough, but some of those shots that hit the bar (especially from the guy who scored for them) could have gone in on another day.
3 times actually!
I must have missed one of them, just heard the commentary say the same player hit the woodwork twice but they didn’t mention another time
I made my post at half time!
Any advance on 4?
One could argue the correct number is 0, due to the goals not being made of wood and therefore should probably not be referred to as the “woodwork” at all.Any advance on 4?
I thought Birmingham could have been 517 for 4 declared by halftime, but I only watched half an hour, so they could have tied up the series by half four for all I knew.Do you turn the TV off when the game is in our half of the pitch or are we supposed to just ignore all their chances and them hitting the woodwork twice?
If we’re looking at what could have happened we could have lost 10-3
Hitting the metalwork doesn't have same ring to itOne could argue the correct number is 0, due to the goals not being made of wood and therefore should probably not be referred to as the “woodwork” at all.
Beans on toastHitting the metalwork doesn't have same ring to it
Has someone dropped a clanger ?One could argue the correct number is 0, due to the goals not being made of wood and therefore should probably not be referred to as the “woodwork” at all.
All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?