Shitehouse Sheffield Stir

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
379
Reaction score
503
I notice yet again the Stir having a love in with the unclean pig barstewards,,and any chance they get to knock our beloved blades they grasp with vigour, Anyone think the club should just fuck um off,totally blank um,as when we hopefully return to the elites again I've no doubt they'll wanting to gobble off Dozy & Co,your thoughts please blades
 



I notice yet again the Stir having a love in with the unclean pig barstewards,,and any chance they get to knock our beloved blades they grasp with vigour, Anyone think the club should just fuck um off,totally blank um,as when we hopefully return to the elites again I've no doubt they'll wanting to gobble off Dozy & Co,your thoughts please blades
Thoughts? Grow the fuck up!
 
I notice yet again the Stir having a love in with the unclean pig barstewards,,and any chance they get to knock our beloved blades they grasp with vigour, Anyone think the club should just fuck um off,totally blank um,as when we hopefully return to the elites again I've no doubt they'll wanting to gobble off Dozy & Co,your thoughts please blades
Who gives a shit no one reads it, they can want all over them for all I care as they’re as they're as much of a dinosaur than that lot across the city
 
There’s definitely a generation who do (my mum at 84 for example) and who I assume keep it going, for now.
 
The Star gets it's information from social media, no real journalism.
To be fair to the star other "news" outlets do the same.
 
Another nail in the coffin of The Stir...seems they can't be arsed to write their own articles now. Just ask AI to write some bollocks for them!

Sad thing is that these are the better-performing articles on social media so you can see where this might end up. What's the point in employing real journalists when AI can get you all the clicks you need to bring in a bit of money.

1736856557420.webp 1736856631362.webp
 
Another nail in the coffin of The Stir...seems they can't be arsed to write their own articles now. Just ask AI to write some bollocks for them!

Sad thing is that these are the better-performing articles on social media so you can see where this might end up. What's the point in employing real journalists when AI can get you all the clicks you need to bring in a bit of money.

View attachment 201667 View attachment 201668
Can AI carry out the negotiations for these £27m of transfers please ?
 
As I put it to me mate yesterday when he sent that article about worst signings, in essence, the frauds that pass for journalists at the Star finally accepting that they are frauds.
 



Journalist using, and admitting to using, AI to generate stories is some kind of turkeys-voting-for-Christmas Darwin-award mega mash-up.
We can all do that:

Who are the 10 worst posters on the S24SU forum?

The Sheffield United fan forum, S24SU, hosts a variety of opinions, and identifying the "worst" posters can be subjective, particularly as it involves personal judgments on contributions, behavior, or other community interactions. However, from the discussions available online, here are some insights based on user feedback:

General Hostility: Some users on the S24SU forum have been criticized for their hostile or negative demeanor. For instance, there's mention of users being perceived as "twats" in general discussions, indicating a broad dissatisfaction with certain individuals' behavior or comments.

Specific Mentions of Bad Behavior:
Grbic Thread: Users have openly expressed frustration with certain posters for their extreme negativity towards players, like Grbic, where comments about "hating" players were deemed irrational and childish by some community members.

Norwood Discussion: There was a notable post where a user's comment about Norwood thinking he was better than he was, was labeled as "possibly the worst post ever on this forum," highlighting how some contributions are seen as particularly poor or unnecessary.

General Threads on Poor Quality Posts:
Worst Player Discussions: Threads where users discuss the worst players often turn into a platform for some to make excessively negative remarks. For example, discussions around Cameron Archer and his performance have led to some of the most critical and possibly over-the-top comments.

Worst Kit, Worst Player XI, Worst Strikers: These threads often attract comments that are seen as overly critical or lacking in constructive input, with users sometimes going to extremes in their language or judgments.

Lack of Constructive Criticism:
In threads like the one discussing Sheffield United's performance against Swansea, some users were noted for their repetitive negativity without offering solutions or constructive feedback.

However, the forum does not explicitly list or rank "worst posters" in any official capacity. The perception of who the "worst" posters are would largely depend on individual experiences and interactions within specific threads.

The community's engagement often reflects frustration with negativity or lack of constructive discourse, rather than personal attacks on individuals. Therefore, while there's no definitive list of the "10 worst posters," the above points give an idea of the kind of behavior or posting styles that receive criticism within the community.
 
We can all do that:

Who are the 10 worst posters on the S24SU forum?

The Sheffield United fan forum, S24SU, hosts a variety of opinions, and identifying the "worst" posters can be subjective, particularly as it involves personal judgments on contributions, behavior, or other community interactions. However, from the discussions available online, here are some insights based on user feedback:

General Hostility: Some users on the S24SU forum have been criticized for their hostile or negative demeanor. For instance, there's mention of users being perceived as "twats" in general discussions, indicating a broad dissatisfaction with certain individuals' behavior or comments.

Specific Mentions of Bad Behavior:
Grbic Thread: Users have openly expressed frustration with certain posters for their extreme negativity towards players, like Grbic, where comments about "hating" players were deemed irrational and childish by some community members.

Norwood Discussion: There was a notable post where a user's comment about Norwood thinking he was better than he was, was labeled as "possibly the worst post ever on this forum," highlighting how some contributions are seen as particularly poor or unnecessary.

General Threads on Poor Quality Posts:
Worst Player Discussions: Threads where users discuss the worst players often turn into a platform for some to make excessively negative remarks. For example, discussions around Cameron Archer and his performance have led to some of the most critical and possibly over-the-top comments.

Worst Kit, Worst Player XI, Worst Strikers: These threads often attract comments that are seen as overly critical or lacking in constructive input, with users sometimes going to extremes in their language or judgments.

Lack of Constructive Criticism:
In threads like the one discussing Sheffield United's performance against Swansea, some users were noted for their repetitive negativity without offering solutions or constructive feedback.

However, the forum does not explicitly list or rank "worst posters" in any official capacity. The perception of who the "worst" posters are would largely depend on individual experiences and interactions within specific threads.

The community's engagement often reflects frustration with negativity or lack of constructive discourse, rather than personal attacks on individuals. Therefore, while there's no definitive list of the "10 worst posters," the above points give an idea of the kind of behavior or posting styles that receive criticism within the community.


Reading between the lines it all points to Fallowfield and his nine other accounts……
 
In a broader sense we ought hold an annual awards ceremony, a bit like the Oscars or BAFTAS.

Garyoke could be the master of ceremonies

"And the award for Biggest Putin Fanboy goes to..." etc etc.
What's a Putin fanboy? Or are you bringing politics into it.

Park a fkin car called N ato on my neighbours lawn who I'm still in dispute with? And I'll take action, or be ridiculed.
 
We can all do that:

Who are the 10 worst posters on the S24SU forum?

The Sheffield United fan forum, S24SU, hosts a variety of opinions, and identifying the "worst" posters can be subjective, particularly as it involves personal judgments on contributions, behavior, or other community interactions. However, from the discussions available online, here are some insights based on user feedback:

General Hostility: Some users on the S24SU forum have been criticized for their hostile or negative demeanor. For instance, there's mention of users being perceived as "twats" in general discussions, indicating a broad dissatisfaction with certain individuals' behavior or comments.

Specific Mentions of Bad Behavior:
Grbic Thread: Users have openly expressed frustration with certain posters for their extreme negativity towards players, like Grbic, where comments about "hating" players were deemed irrational and childish by some community members.

Norwood Discussion: There was a notable post where a user's comment about Norwood thinking he was better than he was, was labeled as "possibly the worst post ever on this forum," highlighting how some contributions are seen as particularly poor or unnecessary.

General Threads on Poor Quality Posts:
Worst Player Discussions: Threads where users discuss the worst players often turn into a platform for some to make excessively negative remarks. For example, discussions around Cameron Archer and his performance have led to some of the most critical and possibly over-the-top comments.

Worst Kit, Worst Player XI, Worst Strikers: These threads often attract comments that are seen as overly critical or lacking in constructive input, with users sometimes going to extremes in their language or judgments.

Lack of Constructive Criticism:
In threads like the one discussing Sheffield United's performance against Swansea, some users were noted for their repetitive negativity without offering solutions or constructive feedback.

However, the forum does not explicitly list or rank "worst posters" in any official capacity. The perception of who the "worst" posters are would largely depend on individual experiences and interactions within specific threads.

The community's engagement often reflects frustration with negativity or lack of constructive discourse, rather than personal attacks on individuals. Therefore, while there's no definitive list of the "10 worst posters," the above points give an idea of the kind of behavior or posting styles that receive criticism within the community.
Name names you metal-arsed coward.
 
For the Reach plc titles, of which The Stir is part of, they can no longer be thought of as journalists, they are measured on clicks and views and it doesn’t matter what the content is nor whether it is “good” or even true.

It must be pretty dispiriting to be a journo at these titles.
 
For the Reach plc titles, of which The Stir is part of, they can no longer be thought of as journalists, they are measured on clicks and views and it doesn’t matter what the content is nor whether it is “good” or even true.

It must be pretty dispiriting to be a journo at these titles.

The Star is NationalWorld, not Reach. I don't see what the crime is in creating content that people actually want to read.
 

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom