Share Price in SUFC & wetspam affair

[beightonblade]

SUFC share trading very quite 19000 traded today at 10p,price on the way down again to 9.5p bid.

Wetspam no news to me says good news!

 

[Foxy]

I'd have thought with the share issue/McCabes plans to delist having been announced it would have a natural decline in trading?

We can only hope with the West Ham news, we've been screwed plenty throughout the whole issue, so can't expect anything different this time around.

 

[beightonblade]

I'd have thought with the share issue/McCabes plans to delist having been announced it would have a natural decline in trading?

We can only hope with the West Ham news, we've been screwed plenty throughout the whole issue, so can't expect anything different this time around.

I'm quite optimistic about the wetspam affair Foxy. The share price tells me there is no hostile investor lurking.

 

[Foxy]

I'm quite optimistic about the wetspam affair Foxy.

I said that about the previous arbitration, was convinced it'd be laughable to do anything but the right thing... sadly I was mistaken.

I have the good old pre-season misguided optimism so would class myself as optimistic but unexpectant.

 

[beightonblade]

Fingers crossed .

 

[Gazza1984]

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/s/sheff_utd/7499856.stm

Sheffield United will find out in September if they will be compensated after their complaints over West Ham's registration of Carlos Tevez.

The Hammers survived in the Premier League in 2007 at the Blades' expense after being fined £5.5m instead of being docked points.

Chairman Kevin McCabe said he remains hopeful about the upcoming verdict.

"It's down to the panel to make their award which should be September," he told BBC Radio Sheffield.

"The formal arbitration hearing was concluded last month but there'll be one more day at the end of July for further oral submissions."

The Blades said they were unfairly demoted from the top flight after West Ham were found guilty of breaching Premier League regulations in the signing of Argentine Tevez and his compatriot Javier Mascherano.

Rather than being docked points by the three-man arbitration panel, the Hammers were fined £5.5m and went on to survive the drop on the final day, while United were relegated.

In July 2007 the High Court refused United leave to appeal the panel's decision over the affair.

But McCabe has continued the club's fight for a financial settlement and it is being heard by a Football Association tribunal.

 

[TonyAgana]

What we've learnt already today:

Fielding ineligible players in other sports results in being kicked out of the competition completely!

Being a Yorkshireman, I'm beginning to develop a complex.

 

[jodman]

What we've learnt already today:

Fielding ineligible players in other sports results in being kicked out of the competition completely!

Being a Yorkshireman, I'm beginning to develop a complex.

That's a very good point, I also notice that Luton have been hit with a huge points deduction for their financial problems reagardless of the fact that most of the blame falls on the shoulders of the previous regime.

I've tried to push the whole fiasco out of my mind but the lack of any juicy transfer gossip has seen my thoughts wander back to tevezgate.