Incoming? Rabbi Matondo

[Upton_Blade]

Bamfords a quality performer .

I didn't say he wasn't

 

[Bladeloyal]

I didn't say he wasn't

No criticism intended

 

[Bergen Blade]

Donovan seems to offer trickery, more than genuine pace. With the likes of Bamford, Hamer and O'Hare likely to play a big part in our attack, it would be nice to have a player with real pace as an option as well. Matondo is absolutely rapid and he showed a couple of good touches, but there are other question marks about his game. He was shoved off the ball a couple of times, but I wouldn't judge him on a couple of mishit shots. Wilder said he's shown good things in training, so let's not write him off at this stage.

 

[NerdyBlade]

At the end of the day - say it's 0-0 in the 80th min, we've tried everything against a stubborn back 4. Someone running full pelt st them with the pace he has for 10mins is a hell of a weapon

 

[The Crab]

We're not linked with Manor Solomon again are we?

In our budget it will be Manor Top…

 

[Booker4]

It's a fair point but a look through our list of signings that probably fall into that bracket shows a hell of a lot more negatives than positives.



I'm not sure Bamford could be classed as "injury prone and past their peak" tbh.

Granted a lot of fans didn't want him but I think that was more to do with his Leeds links rather than him being injury prone.

I recall a lot of fans saying before he signed that he was too old/injury prone rather than Leeds links. I definitely remember that. h

There are players out there that have had a poor spell/lost their way but there's still a player in there. I'm not saying that Mantondo is definitely a good signing but rather there's always sone free transfer teams out there worth taking a risk on. We've had some stinkers that have cost us millions in transfer fees too of course. A free transfer on a one year contract with option of another year for example could be a smart but of business.

 

[ChipButtyBlade]

Being weighed up.