Post Ched era

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?




LoughboroBlade said:
Rewind to last summer and apparently he was going to be ahead of Sharp in the goal scoring charts...
Click to expand...
Fast forward to now and it's an unfair comparison when ched has struggled with injuries and is playing for a side struggling to survive. The player we saw at their place looked excellent when we beat them. He needs service

On the flip side, Billy is having a really good season, getting the support and service from those around him and has hardly missed a game.

Would be an interesting comparison if ched was at someone like Bolton

Ched has something billy doesn't have, pace. Billy has something ched doesn't, 20 goals
 
SwissBlade said:
Fast forward to now and it's an unfair comparison when ched has struggled with injuries and is playing for a side struggling to survive. The player we saw at their place looked excellent when we beat them. He needs service

On the flip side, Billy is having a really good season, getting the support and service from those around him and has hardly missed a game.

Would be an interesting comparison if ched was at someone like Bolton
Click to expand...
Bolton could have made an offer for him if they thought he was any good. Like we did with O'Shea. Or Forest with Kirmani.

He looked decent in the game against Chessy but so did Clarke.

Is he injured again because he's not even been on the bench recently?
 
SwissBlade said:
Fast forward to now and it's an unfair comparison when ched has struggled with injuries and is playing for a side struggling to survive.
Click to expand...

It's a completely fair comparison. His struggles with niggling injuries pretty much reinforces the argument from many last summer that it was pie in the sky to expect he'd be able to immediately pick up where he left off.

He scored 4 goals in the first 3 league games of the season, and has managed to bag 1 in the 17 starts since.

Wilder should be fully applauded for not bowing to the Chedmania hysteria.
 



We all took a keen interest in the Ched case and quite a few got involved in the debate about S41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 [evidence of alleged victims' sexual history].

It might be of interest to know that Professor David Ormerod QC, a leading academic and editor in chief of Blackstone's Criminal Practice, is giving a lecture at the Old Bailey on 21 March at 5-30 entitled "Section 41 - does Ched Evans change anything?"

Unfortunately my day job is likely to preclude a visit to London that day, but some of you Capital dwellers might be interested?

I hope to obtain a video or transcript later.
 
Pinchy said:
We all took a keen interest in the Ched case and quite a few got involved in the debate about S41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 [evidence of alleged victims' sexual history].

It might be of interest to know that Professor David Ormerod QC, a leading academic and editor in chief of Blackstone's Criminal Practice, is giving a lecture at the Old Bailey on 21 March at 5-30 entitled "Section 41 - does Ched Evans change anything?"

Unfortunately my day job is likely to preclude a visit to London that day, but some of you Capital dwellers might be interested?

I hope to obtain a video or transcript later.
Click to expand...

Does the Ched Evans case change anything?
The answer is NO, nothing has changed.

Previous sexual history is still not allowed as evidence to prejudice a case.
However the Ched case was different, the events with 2 other one night stands just before were strikingly similiar to what happended with Ched. The legal system agreed that this new evidence was very relevant and allowed it to be heard by a new jury.

The lecture will be to explain the difference between general sexual history and the fine details of a sexual encounter that is so important to a case. It will also explain that the law hasn't changed and women with sexual histories are still given a fair hearing.

But surely the important point is that justice is done regardless of politics behind it.
Some people seem to lose sight that an innocent man has been falsely imprisoned and lost his career.
 
Pinchy said:
We all took a keen interest in the Ched case and quite a few got involved in the debate about S41 of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 [evidence of alleged victims' sexual history].

It might be of interest to know that Professor David Ormerod QC, a leading academic and editor in chief of Blackstone's Criminal Practice, is giving a lecture at the Old Bailey on 21 March at 5-30 entitled "Section 41 - does Ched Evans change anything?"

Unfortunately my day job is likely to preclude a visit to London that day, but some of you Capital dwellers might be interested?

I hope to obtain a video or transcript later.
Click to expand...

I think the Fat Family mother is attending.

She could do you a decent write up.
 
It's like that shit game everyone used to talk about where you lost if you thought about the game.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Shirt signing
Replies
8
Views
853
Bladesman101
B
Silkblade
Trouble in the crowd - Stoke (A) 29th Dec 2025
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
Tezza1889
Tezza1889
Sharrowblade
The Sheffield Programme & Memorabilia Fair 14th Dec 2025
Replies
17
Views
1K
Foxy
Foxy
Dog and Duck FC
Bettis
Replies
1
Views
499
ISZA ⚔️
ISZA ⚔️
Sid1978
And another thing...!1
Replies
24
Views
4K
DI36O
DI36O

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

All advertisments are hidden for logged in members, why not log in/register?

Back
Top Bottom