Upton_Blade
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2016
- Messages
- 3,672
- Reaction score
- 6,040
I find it funny that people see the game, recognise the players we well below their usual standard and blame it on tactics.
There was clearly a process to stretch the opposition and get in behind. Whether is was executed effectively or not is another matter.
I can see why O’Hare was chosen as a link player to interchange with Hamer and Bamford and Brooks but WBA held firm and kept their shape.
I can see why Two up top might have been discarded in favour of O’Hare ferreting around and causing them problems. Ot didn’t pan out that way.
One moment of quality was the cross Hamer put in for Peck and if he’d scored we’d have 3 points against a very determined, dogged, and dangerous opponent- they should be no where near where they are with the quality of squad they have.
We were excellent vs Cov and Boro but got outdone by two better “teams” who crafted or generated their chances and took them.
There was a process and tactics in both of those games, too.
Just![]()
We'll see won't we if that utter trash is a one off or we just revert to how we were last year.
Also on the highlighted point. Were they well below their "usual standard" for the majority of last season then as Saturday was a carbon copy of a large amount of the games last season only this time we didn't manage to scrape a 1-0 win.
